We performed a comparison between ProcessMaker and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM) while WorkflowGen is ranked 53rd in Business Process Management (BPM). ProcessMaker is rated 7.6, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita, Appian and Nintex Process Platform, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our ProcessMaker vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
