We performed a comparison between Precisely Assure QuickEDD and Zerto based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Synchronous applications are valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Precisely Assure QuickEDD is the backup system."
"During a failover to a DR site, Zerto can automatically change the IP address of servers."
"Zerto's continuous data protection is unmatched. It's phenomenal. It's also very easy to use. The menus are self-explanatory. Once you understand the terminology of the product, what the VPGs (Virtual Protected Groups) are, you're able to pretty much do what you want in the product. It's very easy to use."
"Its ease of use and scalability are valuable."
"Zerto gives us peace of mind knowing that if we were attacked by ransomware, we would be able to recover data from the time before the ransomware to get us back to being fully functional."
"Live replication and up to the second type of failover are valuable. The fact that we can do test failovers and failbacks is important for our ISO certification."
"The most valuable feature is real-time replication, where we have the ability to recover things in near real-time."
"The orchestration and automation of the DR and how it replicates the VMs and then picks them up in the DR site have been most valuable."
"The near-synchronous replication is key. That has allowed us to provide the low RPOs that we promise. For key systems, that has been the deciding factor."
"There should be more interactive dashboards."
"Our administrator found the solution easy to use, but once that administrator left, it felt very overwhelming to the individual who took it over."
"From the technical side, there can be a little bit more PowerShell integration. I know it leverages APIs, but people still use PowerShell. Some people would rather use PowerShell if that is an option."
"An integrated encryption would allow for faster initial install and connection to the remote cloud site."
"Whenever we do a failover, there's a confirmation box that shows up later. It's a little hard to see sometimes... A popup to continue would be a little bit better because then you're not sitting and waiting for something and it's already there."
"The performance was generally good, but occasional lag disrupted the flow, leaving room for improvement."
"There needs to be more flexibility in the licensing."
"I had a couple of questions after deployment, but nothing major, about a couple of ways I could tweak it."
"The product could benefit from improvements in automation, specifically in the area of failovers."
"Zerto could add text alerts if there are critical problems and alerts if changes affect our replication."
Precisely Assure QuickEDD is ranked 21st in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 2 reviews while Zerto is ranked 2nd in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 235 reviews. Precisely Assure QuickEDD is rated 8.6, while Zerto is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Precisely Assure QuickEDD writes "Trustworthy and provides good availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zerto writes "Gives us business continuity capabilities during hurricane season and in case of ransomware". Precisely Assure QuickEDD is most compared with Precisely Assure MIMIX, whereas Zerto is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, VMware SRM, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud and Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines. See our Precisely Assure QuickEDD vs. Zerto report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.