Portworx Enterprise vs SwiftStack [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) and NVIDIA are both solutions in the Cloud Software Defined Storage category. Additionally, 100% of Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NVIDIA users who would recommend it.

Portworx Enterprise

Read 9 Portworx Enterprise reviews

2,754 Views
441 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SwiftStack [EOL]

Read 8 SwiftStack [EOL] reviews

100% willing to recommend

Portworx Enterprise

SwiftStack [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Portworx Enterprise and SwiftStack [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, NetApp, Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) and others in Cloud Software Defined Storage.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Software Defined Storage Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Software Defined Storage

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 917,433 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Portworx Enterprise

Average Rating

9.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Software Defined Storage (3rd), Data Storage for Kubernetes (1st)

SwiftStack [EOL]

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Vishwanath Singh

Senior Engineer 3 at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Data management has become simpler and now supports flexible copies and retention decisions

The best feature is that we have integrated it with Kubernetes. When we have some servers that are going for patching or there is a hardware issue, I can replicate the data into other nodes very easily. I can use some pxctl commands and get the data replicated into other nodes which are healthy. That is the best feature. Managing the data after the initial setup is very easy in Portworx Enterprise. It is also easy to integrate with Kubernetes. We did utilize that functionality. In a disaster recovery scenario, Portworx Enterprise data recovery has been very effective. The only reason why we are moving from Portworx Enterprise to OpenEBS now is because of cost optimizations. I would classify this into two parts: my requirements and my operational efficiencies. My requirements are definitely met by Portworx Enterprise. Once my requirements were met, when I am doing any operational activity, any patching, purging, or any underlying node activities, it is easy for the operational team to manage Portworx Enterprise. They can simply give certain commands, get the underlying data transferred to other nodes, get the data cordoned, and they can take care of the underlying nodes. Portworx Enterprise has been very effective.

Read full review

it_user1759539

System administrator at a library with 11-50 employees

A nicely-done product that provides a lot of graphs and reports to see what's happening in the background and makes configuration easier

It's very well done for what it's supposed to do, and I don't have anything to add, but I would like them to keep it available to the public. SwiftStack is going out of the market. NVIDIA purchased SwiftStack a couple of years ago, and they won't be making it available to the public anymore. Our license is up to March 31st.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We are offering two kinds of environments: one for customers working with modern data and modern application development, and they are finding that it is easier for them to migrate workloads from on-premises to cloud or the other way around."

"The best thing about Portworx is the Stork, they have called the VPS (Volume Replacement Strategy) and they also have topology awareness, and these are the three features I like."

"In a disaster recovery scenario, Portworx Enterprise data recovery has been very effective."

"If I containerize a database server, I know that not only is Portworx providing a persistent and resilient storage backend, but it also meets the database's IOPS requirements, in a containerized environment."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"Portworx virtualizes the aspects of the underlying block storage. That is good because they can also use block storage for their future deployment instead of just NFS."

"I like that you have a small dedicated file system that is fast and resilient for containerized workloads."

"Portworx is a simple solution. It's similar to Pure Storage products. They're all easy to use and install. You need to have a little expertise with containers to use Portworx, but it will be no problem for you if you understand containers."

More Portworx Enterprise pros

"The most valuable feature is its versatility. We use 1space and we can use it for almost anything: for our cloud service, for backups of VMs."

"SwiftStack has decreased our cost for storing and utilizing data, definitely by half."

"In terms of the hardware flexibility, with SwiftStack not being a hardware company, I literally buy any hardware that's the least expensive, from any vendor... from a flexibility standpoint, I think it's fantastic. I can go to anybody, anywhere - any vendor - and get my hardware."

"The performance is good. It is a secondary storage platform designed for archive and backup, so performance for the right use cases is very good. We have been pretty happy in that regard."

"The scalability is phenomenal. It seems infinite, as long as you put enough storage in place, add enough nodes."

"It is a very well-done solution; I have no issues with it, it is well-explained, and configuration is easy with it."

"The SwiftStack Controller, which is the web UI, provides out of band management. This has been one of the best features of it. It allows us to be able to do upgrades and look at performance metrics. It is a top feature and reason to choose the product."

"SwiftStack is also quite flexible when it comes to hardware. It depends, of course, on the use case and the kind of hardware you want to buy. But you have quite a bit of choice in hardware. The SwiftStack software itself does not impose anything on you."

More SwiftStack [EOL] pros

Cons

"The integration has room for improvement."

"Regarding pricing, I found that a couple of customers did not purchase the project because, at least in Spain, there are customers finding the pricing a little too high for the service they receive."

"It would be highly advantageous to include an integrated backup solution within the same license, rather than purchasing backup separately."

"I would like to see a more native mapping to mainframe-type systems."

"As far as I know, Portworx Enterprise was a bit expensive when compared to OpenEBS."

"I think the vendor could provide more training for new users who may not be familiar with containers."

"They have not integrated Portworx with Ondat since they are too focused now on Pure Storage APIs and not on users like us."

"The documentation could be better."

"Don't use it because it will go off the market in three months. It won't be available."

"The file access needs improvement. The NFS was rolled out as a single service. It needs to be fully integrated into the proxy in a highly available fashion, like the regular proxy access is. I know it's on the roadmap."

"They should provide a more concise hardware calculator when you're putting your capacity together."

"We find the pricing rather steep."

"At the moment we are using Erasure coding in an 8+4 setting. What would be nice is if, for some standard configurations like 15+4 and 8+4, there were more versatility so we could, for example, select 8+6, or the like."

"On the controller features, there needs to be a bit more clean up of the user interface."

"Management UI can be improved and have more functionalities."

"On the controller features, there needs to be a bit more clean up of the user interface. There are a lot of options available on the GUI which might be better organized or compartmentalized. There are times when you are going through the user interface and you have to look around for where the setting may be. A little bit more attention to the organization of the user interface would be helpful."

More SwiftStack [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is competitive, but it is too expensive when paired with Red Hat IBM."

"The price of Portworx Enterprise is high."

"I'm not sure how the licensing was broken out, but I don't think our offering of the Portworx was more than USD $20,000."

"It has two offerings. One is free, which is limited to only five nodes. The other is enterprise, which is a bit pricier."

"The pricing model is great and makes sense. We have talked about how to get into more of a frequent billing cycle than once a year. That would be an interesting concept to add into the product, having the ability to have monthly billing instead of having to do a one-year licensing renewal. However, the way the license works by charging for storage consumed is definitely what makes them the most competitive."

"The pricing and licensing are capacity-based, so it's hard to put my finger on them, because so many different vendors charge in different ways. We are still saving significantly over any of the other options that we evaluated because we can choose the best hardware at the best price, then put SwiftStack software on it. So, it's hard to complain, even though a part of me goes, "It would be nicer if it were less expensive.""

"We have had a 40 to 50 percent reduction in CAPEX on the acquisition of new hardware, which is probably conservative."

"Dollar per gigabyte, it costs us more because we are storing more. However, if you look at it from a cost per gigabyte perspective, we have dropped our costs significantly."

"One of their advantages of being a commercial open source platform is, for the scale that they offer, the pricing is pretty competitive."

"We are able to dynamically grow storage at a lower cost. We can repurpose hardware and buy commodity hardware. There is a huge cost savings, on average $100,000 a year compared to traditional storage for what we have at our size."

"It's pricey for us because we're a nonprofit. I'm not privy to any amount or cost, but I have been told that it is pricey. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees, and it seems to come with the support."

"All in, with hardware and everything else - and I hate to say a dollar amount because it's been awhile since I computed it - I know I'm under the $300 to $500 per terabyte mark. I call that my "all in" price, which has replications built in and protections built in."

More SwiftStack [EOL] pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Software Defined Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Outsourcing Company

15%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portworx Enterprise?

Pricing is good as the functionalities of Portworx Enterprise are explainable. Pricing is bearable, but licensing is a little more complex.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portworx Enterprise?

The only reason why we are moving from Portworx Enterprise to OpenEBS now is because of cost optimizations.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Portworx Enterprise?

I have so much experience in Dynatrace and also I have experience in Grafana and in Kubernetes. Kubernetes is the last one that I have experience with. It has helped greatly. It is very beneficial....

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 13% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

StarWind HyperConverged Appliance vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Spectrum Scale vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Dell Container Storage Modules vs Portworx Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

More Portworx Enterprise Competitors

Dell ObjectScale vs SwiftStack [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs SwiftStack [EOL]

Compared 21% of the time

DataCore SANsymphony vs SwiftStack [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs SwiftStack [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

More SwiftStack [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Portworx Enterprise

October 2026

Download Portworx Enterprise product report

Buyer's Guide

SwiftStack [EOL]

September 2026

Download SwiftStack [EOL] product report

Overview

Portworx Enterprise specializes in security, backup, and disaster recovery for Kubernetes. It offers advanced multi-cluster storage management, enabling seamless migration between on-premises and cloud environments.

Portworx Enterprise provides robust security and management features essential for Kubernetes environments, supporting efficient cross-cluster storage management and facilitating smooth migration between on-premises and cloud platforms. Its resilience and functionality allow users to focus on containerized workloads. Stork and topology awareness enhance usability, complemented by comprehensive documentation for PersistentVolumes and PersistentVolumeClaims implementation. Competing with Rancher's Longhorn, it matches Pure Storage's simplicity.

What features define Portworx Enterprise?

Security: Prioritizes secure data handling and robust disaster recovery.
Autopilot: Automates storage management for efficiency.
Backup and Disaster Recovery: Ensures data resilience and availability.
Multi-cluster Support: Facilitates efficient cross-cluster interactions.
Stork: Enhances operational dynamics and usability.
Volume Replacement Strategy: Increases storage reliability.
Topology Awareness: Optimizes storage placement for performance.

What benefits and ROI should users anticipate?

Efficient Migration: Seamlessly transition data across environments without disruption.
Data Locality: Maximizes the accessibility and speed of data.
Enhanced Usability: Improves interaction simplicity and management ease.
Documentation: Provides clear guidance for PersistentVolume integration.
High Satisfaction: Users gain solutions aligning with modern application needs.

Portworx Enterprise is utilized in containerized environments, predominantly in cloud settings with Kubernetes. Users often shift from open-source to enterprise-grade capabilities, benefiting from its efficiency in implementing shared volumes and strong data locality features. Those using dedicated storage for provisioning pure volumes report high satisfaction levels, particularly when exploring modern application settings.

Everpure (formerly Pure Storage)

SwiftStack [EOL] offers robust cloud integration, rapid deployment, and hardware-agnostic capabilities, making it a preferred choice for organizations needing scalable and flexible storage solutions. It supports a variety of storage needs from object storage to enterprise-grade backup systems.

SwiftStack [EOL] is recognized for its seamless cloud integration and platform independence, enabling rapid deployment and superior scalability. Its metadata search, proxyFS, and 1space feature enhance versatility and backup efficiency. SwiftStack Controller provides an enhanced management experience with easy system upgrades and performance monitoring. While the management UI and ProxyFS maturity have room for improvement, users seek more organized interfaces and better REST API support. Enhancements in erasure coding configurations and data archiving, along with improved client library integrations, are highlighted needs. The demand for NFS integration improvements and options for data movement between storage policies is noted.

What are the key features of SwiftStack?

Rapid Deployment: Fast and efficient system setup.
Scalability: Easily adapts to growing storage needs.
Flexibility: Hardware-agnostic and platform independent.
Resiliency: Robust data protection mechanisms.
Cloud Integration: Seamlessly integrates with cloud services.
Metadata Search: Facilitates efficient data retrieval.
ProxyFS Capability: Offers versatile storage solutions.
1space Feature: Enhances backup efficiency.

What benefits and ROI should be expected in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces deployment and operational costs.
Performance: Fast data ingestion and access speed.
Enhanced Management: Simplifies system management with advanced tools.
Versatility: Supports diverse storage needs from backups to cloud services.

SwiftStack [EOL] is implemented in industries as a backup platform for Commvault and Veeam, cloud storage similar to Amazon S3 or Azure Blob. It's essential for SaaS platforms, data sharing in research, preproduction object storage, data center operations, and archival management for OpenStack Swift servers in educational and research institutions.

NVIDIA

Sample Customers

NIO, GE Digital, DreamWorks Animation, Lufthansa, beco, NEW CONTEXT

Pac-12 Networks, Georgia Institute of Technology, Budd Van Lines

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Software Defined Storage

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, NetApp, Everpure (formerly Pure Storage) and others in Cloud Software Defined Storage. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

917,433 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Software Defined Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Software Defined Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.