No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Dell Container Storage Modules vs Portworx Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Dell Container Storage Modules
Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Portworx Enterprise
Ranking in Data Storage for Kubernetes
1st
Average Rating
9.2
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Software Defined Storage (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Data Storage for Kubernetes category, the mindshare of Dell Container Storage Modules is 7.7%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portworx Enterprise is 21.3%, down from 44.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Storage for Kubernetes Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Portworx Enterprise21.3%
Dell Container Storage Modules7.7%
Other71.0%
Data Storage for Kubernetes
 

Featured Reviews

Use Dell Container Storage Modules?
Leave a review
Vishwanath Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Engineer 3 at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Data management has become simpler and now supports flexible copies and retention decisions
The best feature is that we have integrated it with Kubernetes. When we have some servers that are going for patching or there is a hardware issue, I can replicate the data into other nodes very easily. I can use some pxctl commands and get the data replicated into other nodes which are healthy. That is the best feature. Managing the data after the initial setup is very easy in Portworx Enterprise. It is also easy to integrate with Kubernetes. We did utilize that functionality. In a disaster recovery scenario, Portworx Enterprise data recovery has been very effective. The only reason why we are moving from Portworx Enterprise to OpenEBS now is because of cost optimizations. I would classify this into two parts: my requirements and my operational efficiencies. My requirements are definitely met by Portworx Enterprise. Once my requirements were met, when I am doing any operational activity, any patching, purging, or any underlying node activities, it is easy for the operational team to manage Portworx Enterprise. They can simply give certain commands, get the underlying data transferred to other nodes, get the data cordoned, and they can take care of the underlying nodes. Portworx Enterprise has been very effective.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Storage for Kubernetes solutions are best for your needs.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
26%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
8%
Computer Software Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise5
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portworx Enterprise?
Pricing is good as the functionalities of Portworx Enterprise are explainable. Pricing is bearable, but licensing is a little more complex.
What needs improvement with Portworx Enterprise?
The complexity of licensing is something we faced, as the licensing model can be difficult to understand initially. Portworx Enterprise could introduce more transparency and simplification to resol...
What advice do you have for others considering Portworx Enterprise?
I would rate Portworx Enterprise a ten out of ten because it has many attractive functionalities. I would recommend Portworx Enterprise to organizations running production Kubernetes workloads that...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
NIO, GE Digital, DreamWorks Animation, Lufthansa, beco, NEW CONTEXT
Find out what your peers are saying about Everpure (formerly Pure Storage), InfoScale, ScaleOps and others in Data Storage for Kubernetes. Updated: August 2026.
912,565 professionals have used our research since 2012.