Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Polycom RealPresence Desktop vs Zoom comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Polycom RealPresence Desktop
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
16th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
8.5
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zoom
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
225
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of Polycom RealPresence Desktop is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zoom is 11.2%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

NH
Regular use enables effective communication with room for improvement in interoperability
The most valuable part of the desktop is the ability to make voice and video calls. Without getting too technical or divulging too much due to the environment we are in, it allows us to further our reach, from a traditional video conferencing room. Scalability was easy. It was based on calls, not licenses.
Luiz Kazan - PeerSpot reviewer
Utilizing versatile features for efficient personal and work meetings
Zoom offers a number of interesting and valuable features. One of the most interesting is the ability to share only audio and provide ambient music without sharing a screen. The breakout room feature is much more developed than other solutions, allowing users to stay in the same meeting and move to different rooms and back to the main room. The sharing features are great for projecting people who should be in focus. Another valuable feature is the virtual entrance, which uses a username and password recognized by the Zoom system, showing the person's full name and ID. Additionally, the use of video and a good fixed background improves visibility compared to other applications. These features differentiate Zoom from others.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It allows us to further our reach, from a traditional video conferencing room."
"Overall, Zoom is a good product because we are using it globally, and it is a good way of connecting with everyone globally."
"The initial setup is straightforward as this is a cloud application. It only takes a few seconds."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The product is scalable."
"It always works, and they try to appeal to what the user wants. They added features like background music for those people who use Zoom for online church services. They try to make the solution more useful for the user. For example, I tried to sell WebEx to a church, but I also gave them Zoom for a trial. They were impressed with that because that was the feature they were looking for."
"Zoom is stable and easy to use."
"I have been satisfied with the features and capability of Zoom."
"It is a stable solution."
 

Cons

"There is probably room for improvement in interoperability."
"I would like to see them develop end-to-end encryption, like WhatsApp. That would improve the security of the software."
"Zoom often does fixes or checks the vulnerability of their solution. However, they could increase security."
"Variable sound quality."
"The security needs to be improved."
"They should remove any restriction of time."
"The chat functionality in Zoom could improve."
"It's not really the fault of the product, however, the internet connectivity can sometimes be an issue."
"Could be more flexible for individuals that do not have the economic capacity."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Zoom is a very cheaply priced video conferencing solution, and using this product has saved our business a lot of expense."
"I use Zoom's free version."
"We are using the free version of Zoom."
"We generally have a strict budget so the pricing for Zoom is reasonable."
"Zoom can be used for free."
"I believe that all of their licenses are purchased, so that they may use the solution for their teaching purposes."
"There are no licensing fees required."
"I am using the free version of Zoom."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Educational Organization
86%
University
2%
Financial Services Firm
2%
Computer Software Company
2%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Polycom RealPresence Desktop?
There is probably room for improvement in interoperability.
What is your primary use case for Polycom RealPresence Desktop?
We use the desktop. It was used in the same case. We use it with our partners.
LucidChart vs LucidSpark for brainstorming sessions over Zoom
Hi @Krista Thompson ​ - Yes, LucidSpark is a much more nimble and, in some ways, user-friendly tool than LucidChart. LucidSpark is designed to do a better job managing multiple users participating ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zoom?
Zoom offers a free version for up to forty minutes.
 

Also Known As

RealPresence Desktop
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

John Laing, China Daily, Lincoln Fire and Rescue, NATO Communications and Information Agency, NHS Home Dialysis, Silver Chain, South Carolina Department of Mental Health, nimed
Fortinet, Veeva, Proofpoint, Box, Ticketmaster, Trend Micro, Caesars Entertainment, Santa Clara University, Pandora, Stanford Continuing Studies
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, Microsoft and others in Virtual Meetings. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.