Parasoft Development Testing Platform vs SpecFlow comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Parasoft Logo
79 views|60 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tricentis Logo
464 views|196 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Parasoft Development Testing Platform and SpecFlow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Test Management Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature is code coverage.""It really helps developers execute scenarios through DTP and share reports/results across the teams."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Pros →

"SpecFlow's best feature is the ability to add additional layers to the programming.""The initial setup is easy.""The most valuable feature of the solution is unit testing...It is also an easy-to-use and user-friendly product that can easily adapt to any framework.""One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities."

More SpecFlow Pros →

Cons
"Parallel execution: It would help it multiple executions could be done at the same time.""The solution's speed has room for improvement."

More Parasoft Development Testing Platform Cons →

"I'd prefer in TFS if we could be writing test cases, not in the old classical version. We should be writing in Gherkin and then automatically have it convert that Gherkin test case into SpecFlow feature files.""SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool.""Regarding improvement, it would be good if SpecFlow could provide chain testing, which it currently doesn't allow.""SpecFlow would be improved with the addition of functionality reporting, which would be really helpful for automation testing."

More SpecFlow Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "SpecFlow is open-source and free of charge."
  • "SpecFlow is an open-source product."
  • More SpecFlow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is code coverage.
    Top Answer:The solution's speed has room for improvement.
    Top Answer:We use the Parasoft Development Testing Platform to verify code coverage for static analysis in our unit tests.
    Top Answer:One of the most valuable features of SpecFlow for us is its risk identification capabilities.
    Top Answer:SpecFlow is an open-source product. You just use SpecFlow's plugin capabilities or add it to your existing framework.
    Top Answer:In terms of improvement, SpecFlow's installation and configuration can be a bit challenging due to its flexibility as an open-source tool. While it offers a balanced flexibility, setting it up might… more »
    Ranking
    18th
    Views
    79
    Comparisons
    60
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    217
    Rating
    8.0
    9th
    Views
    464
    Comparisons
    196
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    609
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Parasoft Concerto, Parasoft DTP
    SpecFlow+
    Learn More
    Overview

    Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t.  Includes:

    - Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards

    - Preconfigured compliance reporting

    - Customized Advanced Analytics

    - Interactive Navigation of Results

    - Traceability

    SpecFlow is a testing framework that supports Behaviour Driven Development (BDD). It lets us define application behavior in plain meaningful English text using a simple grammar defined by a language called Gherkin.

    Sample Customers
    General Motors, Lockheed Martin, Qualcomm, AAI Textron, Boeing, Fidelity, Johnson & Johnson, CIBC, Penske, Thales, Dell, 
    Microsoft, Caterpillar, Siemens, Charles Schwab, IBM, Deloitte, Accenture, Philips, Dell, Deutsche Bank
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Energy/Utilities Company9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Test Management Tools
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText, IDERA, Microsoft and others in Test Management Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    770,458 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Parasoft Development Testing Platform is ranked 18th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews while SpecFlow is ranked 9th in Test Management Tools with 4 reviews. Parasoft Development Testing Platform is rated 8.6, while SpecFlow is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Parasoft Development Testing Platform writes "Provides 100 percent code coverage, is stable, and scalable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SpecFlow writes "Ensures efficient testing and validation of both business and technical requirements". Parasoft Development Testing Platform is most compared with Codebeamer, whereas SpecFlow is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, Tricentis qTest and TestRail.

    See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.