"The most valuable feature is automation."
"The additional value of having Java inside the Oracle database is all the security that is applied to an Oracle database will be enforced on Java's stored procedures as well."
"It has a programming language so anything that we require for Selenium is all available there."
"It's very clever."
"Able to write queries more efficiently and the management of data has become better and easier."
"What I like most are the dashboards and pervasive analytics."
"It's easy to use, and the Hana Studio is pretty good."
"We have found the solution to be customizable and it is beneficial it comes as a bundled package. Additionally, it is user-friendly."
"Its in-memory capabilities are good, which is why many companies still use it."
"Using this solution has given us better details for reporting and analytics."
"We like that the product is both vertically and horizontally scalable, allowing us to do around 86 percent compression of documentation from 50 to seven terabytes."
"The performance in terms of processing time is unmatched due to the in-memory processing capability."
"We've had good experiences with technical support."
"The solution should continue to keep updating and improving the Java language."
"In terms of improvement, I'd like an automation tool that is lower priced. The core prices are very high."
"The biggest lesson that I have learned from using Oracle products is vendor lock-in."
"Needs improvement in consistency issues with respect to timeframes."
"It'll be better if Oracle Java supports open source technologies, like Node.js."
"The documentation can be improved in the future."
"Uses a large amount of RAM and is costly."
"SAP HANA is not perfect and they could improve by having more options and more integration."
"The solution is very expensive for us."
"High availability and disaster recovery are very poor in HANA."
"There's an issue in the partition. When you record more than two million records, partitioning does not work well. In Oracle it's easy. SAP must resolve this issue in order to be more competitive with Oracle."
"It would be nice to know when SAP plans to stop its maintenance of a previous version of SAP ECC ERP because, at this point, anyone utilizing SAP will have no choice but to go on S/4HANA Database."
"There could be better management for faster updates, last year there were some changes in India to the e-invoicing feature."
Oracle Java DB is ranked 10th in Relational Databases with 5 reviews while SAP HANA is ranked 4th in Relational Databases with 25 reviews. Oracle Java DB is rated 8.4, while SAP HANA is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle Java DB writes "A relational database management system that's very clever and object-oriented". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP HANA writes "Very robust solution with good data access". Oracle Java DB is most compared with MySQL, SQL Server, Apache Derby and Oracle Database, whereas SAP HANA is most compared with SQL Server, Oracle Database, MySQL, Apache Spark and IBM Db2 Database. See our Oracle Java DB vs. SAP HANA report.
See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
