Oracle Database as a Service vs SQL Azure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
2,870 views|2,360 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
11,317 views|5,249 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Database as a Service and SQL Azure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Database as a Service vs. SQL Azure Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Not only does it provide a mature, reliable solution for DR. It also helps if application owners need to look into data which is a couple of hours old, using Flashback Database on the standby database.""I will rate this solution a nine out of ten. We have been using this solution for the past ten years. We will continue the partnership. I do not expect to see any further integration of the tool with our software. I will recommend this tool to those with a large database.""It's a scalable product.""As a database administrator, it has a lot of features to help you manage the database and the backup.""Oracle Database as a Service is stable.""When we want more information on something that we are using, it is easy to find related topics on the internet.""Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.""My impression of the scalability of Oracle Database as a Service is very high."

More Oracle Database as a Service Pros →

"SQL Azure can integrate well with other Microsoft Windows services.""The backup features are the most valuable.""The most valuable aspect of SQL Azure is the SQL language itself. It's open and everybody can use it at my company. Also, we thought in the beginning that the response time would be inadequate, but it's actually decent. It's much better than expected. Then again, I'm not a programmer, but that's what I hear from our development team.""We primarily and generally use it only for DB purposes. When it comes to the Azure part, we can easily provision, scale up, and scale down the generator machine. This kind of flexibility is the USP of SQL Azure. Its interface and ease of use are also valuable. It is very easy to use and integrate with multiple databases. If I need to pull in or import some data from my on-premises database, the ease with which you can connect and pull the data, not only from SQL Server but also from other flavors of MySQL or even Oracle, is very good.""I am very happy with this solution; right now, I don't think there is anything I would change.""The most useful feature of Azure SQL is the queries for manipulating the data, such as the tables and the storage processors.""They have good documentation. It's concentrated information.""My impression is that this solution is quite stable."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"The area in this solution that could be improved is that currently, it's difficult to do the setup. You need to do all kinds of command lines to get it set up. If that setup becomes easier and easily manageable, that would be great.""Some bugs could be fixed. There have been some internal software bugs, just like any other newly released software. These bugs gets fixed by patch updates from Oracle on regular basis.""The product must improve its performance.""Oracle DBaaS could be compatible with more platforms.""Earlier, the interface was continuously changing. Features you used would be moved somewhere else, so it was a little challenging to navigate, but now I think it's stable.""The solution’s pricing could be improved.""My favorite option – Multitenant – should be available for some pluggable databases in all editions, without any fee.""The solution’s price could be reduced."

More Oracle Database as a Service Cons →

"The solution can be improved by reducing the constraints available.""The solution lacks feedback tools.""The solution can be improved by reducing the cost so more users can be added.""This solution would be improved with the inclusion of better self-service tools.""The preset configuration switches we can select on SQL Azure should be made more liberal to work on.""There could be more collaboration with other tools like Data Factory and Databricks.""Operational cost needs improvement.""They should include more accessible functions for image tooling."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The licensing is a nightmare. Tons of options which need to be licensed individually, and no real offering for VMware or other Hypervisors."
  • "There should be a standard way to license the database in a virtual environment (e.g. VMware) and there should be a low-end version (like Standard Edition One) again."
  • "The price depends on the solution you choose: standard, enterprise, or high performance. For example, enterprise can start between 0.4 an hour up to 1,800. Additional fees also depends on what package you choose. Your feels will be different if you choose the standard, enterprise, high performance, or extreme package. You will pay in relation to what option you ask for. The price is very good if you compare it to other databases."
  • "The pricing may seem expensive, but the value corresponds to the quality of the product."
  • "The pricing is a little bit expensive."
  • "The price of Oracle Database as a Service could be better."
  • "I do not know firsthand about the price of Oracle Database as a Service, but it is known that Oracle solutions tend to be priced higher than competitors."
  • "For on-premises, a perpetual license is a standard $17,500 plus 22% for one year of support."
  • More Oracle Database as a Service Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It has significantly enhanced our application development process by introducing substantial time savings and streamlining routine tasks.
    Top Answer:It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing an eight out of ten.
    Top Answer:Improvement in Oracle DBaaS could focus on enhancing performance monitoring and reporting tools. A more streamlined utility tool would be beneficial, reducing the need for manual intervention in… more »
    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    5th
    Views
    2,870
    Comparisons
    2,360
    Reviews
    45
    Average Words per Review
    330
    Rating
    8.6
    2nd
    Views
    11,317
    Comparisons
    5,249
    Reviews
    35
    Average Words per Review
    383
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Oracle DBaaS, Oracle Database Cloud
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle Database Cloud Service combines the power of Oracle Database, with the unique capabilities of the Oracle Cloud. The service provides a secure, automated data management platform that leverages on demand Oracle Cloud Infrastructure services via a simple web based user interface and RESTful API. Oracle Database Cloud Service provides elastic database services for development, test, and production environments of custom and packaged online transaction processing (OLTP), data warehousing, and mixed workload applications. It enables businesses to reap all Oracle Platform as a Service (PaaS) benefits including subscriptionbased, self-service access to reliable, scalable, and elastic cloud environments and accelerates time to value by simplifying the provisioning and administration of Oracle databases.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    Solution-Soft, DX Marketing, Suredell and Partners, Frontiers, SettleOurEstate.com, Demand Analysis Ltd, endlich IT & Projekt Service OHG
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Government12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise64%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    Oracle Database as a Service vs. SQL Azure
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database as a Service vs. SQL Azure and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,995 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Database as a Service is ranked 5th in Database as a Service with 63 reviews while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. Oracle Database as a Service is rated 8.6, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Database as a Service writes "Quite stable and renewable with an easy setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". Oracle Database as a Service is most compared with Amazon RDS, Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer, Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB Atlas and Google Cloud Spanner, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB Atlas, Google Cloud Spanner and IBM Db2 on Cloud. See our Oracle Database as a Service vs. SQL Azure report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.