We performed a comparison between Oracle BPM and webMethods Integration Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."
"The most valuable feature is the complete workflow through the BPM, from making it available as a generated code based on the backend, deploying it in the test environment, and then going to production."
"I find the data lineage features most valuable."
"This solution has given us a quick time to market, the ability to integrate with the rest of the corporate applications, and the ability to hire talent in low-cost locations."
"What I found most valuable in Oracle BPM is that it has a lot of out-of-the-box integrations. The solution also provides a lot of adapters which is very helpful."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"It is easy and cheap."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"The synchronous and asynchronous messaging system the solution provides is very good."
"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."
"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."
"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."
"When it comes to the user interface, I'm already really used to it. I cannot say anything against it. For me, it's easy to use."
"Application integration, business process integration, and B2B partner integration are valuable. But among these, I feel B2B partner integration is the most valuable. This module integrates two business partners and exchanges data through electronic data interchange messages in the form of specific standards, without any manual process needed."
"The product supports various types of digital documents, including XMLs and EDI."
"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."
"Every time we roll out a new version of processes, we have to migrate to a new process. The process of this migration was not very smooth. We later decided that it would be easier for us to stop all processes, deploy a new version and then restart."
"The default Workspace does not meet all our needs and sometimes you need to create your own custom Workspace."
"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."
"We have had some issues with version migration, from one version of processes to another. We would have to call Oracle Services but on a day to day, we didn't have any issues."
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."
"Overall, the engine and the UI both have to be made lighter."
"Their Case Management set of features is severely lacking and should be a target for immediate improvement dealing with unpredictable processes inside of organizations."
"You have to maintain it manually."
"As webMethods Integration Server is expensive, that's its area for improvement."
"The product must add more compatible connectors."
"The installation process should be simplified for first time users and be made more user-friendly."
"In terms of scale, I would give it a four out of 10."
"This product has too many gaps. You find them after update installations. This should be covered by automatic testing."
"Documentation needs tuning. There is a lot of dependency with SoftwareAG. Even with the documentation at hand, you can struggle to implement scenarios without SAG’s help. By contrast, IBM’s documentation is self-explanatory, in my opinion."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"We got the product via a reseller, and the support from the reseller has been less than desirable."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews while webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews. Oracle BPM is rated 7.4, while webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Apache Airflow, whereas webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration. See our Oracle BPM vs. webMethods Integration Server report.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
