We changed our name from IT Central Station: Here's why

OpenVPN Access Server vs Pulse Connect Secure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN Access Server vs. Pulse Connect Secure and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It was very easy to set up users.""There is support for multi-factor authentication.""OpenVPN Access Server is cheap, and we get to use it ourselves. It is also a stable solution."

More OpenVPN Access Server Pros →

"The most valuable feature is being able to securely connect and use virtual desktops.""It is customer-friendly. It is quite easy for our users to connect. There is also the flexibility of the features."

More Pulse Connect Secure Pros →

Cons
"The security needs to be improved because it was a complaint that our customers had.""It is not scalable.""The high availability deployment is not very straightforward. They can make it simpler. OpenVPN does not support some of the additional protocols that Pulse Secure and Cisco AnyConnect support. They can include support for these additional protocols."

More OpenVPN Access Server Cons →

"We want to switch to another solution because there are some challenges with the support from Pulse. The quality of documentation is also not good. It is sometimes very hard to find documentation that provides a solution and describes how all this works.""This solution normally works but at times, we have had trouble with connectivity."

More Pulse Connect Secure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is an open-source solution, so we don't pay for anything."
  • More OpenVPN Access Server Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer: 
    Fortinet FortiClient is a feature-rich solution that is easy to use and deploy without sacrificing safety and security. It has a very fast connection rate and has a built-in VPN. With this solution… more »
    Top Answer: 
    OpenVPN Access Server is cheap, and we get to use it ourselves. It is also a stable solution.
    Top Answer: 
    It is an open-source solution, so we don't pay for anything.
    Top Answer: 
    It is customer-friendly. It is quite easy for our users to connect. There is also the flexibility of the features.
    Top Answer: 
    We want to switch to another solution because there are some challenges with the support from Pulse. The quality of documentation is also not good. It is sometimes very hard to find documentation that… more »
    Top Answer: 
    We are using it as a remote access solution for our users and partners.
    Ranking
    Views
    12,389
    Comparisons
    10,421
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    386
    Rating
    7.7
    Views
    7,845
    Comparisons
    5,505
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    448
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OpenVPN
    Learn More
    Overview

    OpenVPN is an open-source software application that implements virtual private network techniques for creating secure point-to-point or site-to-site connections in routed or bridged configurations and remote access facilities.

    The Pulse Connect Secure enables you to give employees, partners, and customers secure and controlled access to your corporate data and applications including file servers, Web servers, native messaging and e-mail clients, hosted servers, and more from outside your trusted network using just a Web browser.
    Offer
    Learn more about OpenVPN Access Server
    Learn more about Pulse Connect Secure
    Sample Customers
    Verizon, Amazon, Disney, HP, Microsoft, IBM, Samsung
    Axcient, Baloise Group, Cygate, Catholic University of America, Datec Inc, Revlon, Santa Monica Networks, 7-Eleven
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider39%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Government7%
    Educational Organization4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Comms Service Provider22%
    Government10%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business73%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise9%
    No Data Available
    Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN Access Server vs. Pulse Connect Secure and other solutions. Updated: January 2022.
    563,780 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    OpenVPN Access Server is ranked 6th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 3 reviews while Pulse Connect Secure is ranked 7th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 2 reviews. OpenVPN Access Server is rated 7.6, while Pulse Connect Secure is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of OpenVPN Access Server writes "Easy to set up and use, offers multi-factor authentication, and technical support is good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pulse Connect Secure writes "Provides good security for our virtual desktops while working remotely from home". OpenVPN Access Server is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, Check Point Remote Access VPN, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, whereas Pulse Connect Secure is most compared with Fortinet FortiClient, Cisco IOS SSL VPN, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway, SonicWall SMA and VMware Workspace ONE. See our OpenVPN Access Server vs. Pulse Connect Secure report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.