Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs Visual Studio Test Professional comparison

OpenText and Microsoft are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Microsoft’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Read 17 OpenText UFT Digital Lab reviews
  • 598 Views
  • 339 Comparison Views
82% willing to recommend
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Read 52 Visual Studio Test Professional reviews
  • 431 Views
  • 354 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Visual Studio Test Professional and OpenText UFT Digital Lab are competitive products in the software testing landscape. While Visual Studio Test Professional may offer advantages in pricing and support, OpenText UFT Digital Lab is often regarded as superior due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Visual Studio Test Professional features robust integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, seamless code tracking, and a focus on Agile workflows. OpenText UFT Digital Lab offers cross-platform testing capabilities, advanced AI-driven test automation, and enhanced mobile testing functionality.

Room for Improvement: Visual Studio Test Professional could enhance its cross-platform testing capabilities and improve its support for non-Microsoft environments. Additionally, it may benefit from stronger AI-driven automation features. OpenText UFT Digital Lab can work on reducing initial setup complexity, improving user interface simplicity, and enhancing its support network to match Microsoft's level.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Visual Studio Test Professional provides straightforward deployment with tight integration into development environments, supported by Microsoft's extensive support network. OpenText UFT Digital Lab offers flexible deployment options, including cloud and on-premises, which require more initial effort, and typically necessitates dedicated support due to its complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Visual Studio Test Professional is generally more cost-effective with lower initial setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In contrast, OpenText UFT Digital Lab, despite higher costs, offers a potentially higher ROI through its expansive testing capabilities and automation efficiency.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Visual Studio Test Professional Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
18th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (5th)
Visual Studio Test Professi...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Digital Lab is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Visual Studio Test Professional is 0.7%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Robinson Caiado - PeerSpot reviewer
Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation
It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.
Read full review
ALFONSO LORENZO-RODRÍGUEZ - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides extensive extensions and plugins for seamless AI product development
Our primary use case for Visual Studio Test Professional is as a development tool. We develop software primarily in Python, specifically for applications related to artificial intelligence. We use frameworks like PyTorch for training models and developing applications using these models. This tool…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product is easy to use."
"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."
"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."
"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."
"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."
"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a very scalable solution."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a user-friendly solution."
"Searching is extensive and helpful."
"The solution is very stable; there's nothing in relation to stability to complain about."
"The performance of Visual Studio Test Professional is valuable."
"It's great for the development of .NET."
"The integrated unit testing and extensive search features have made things easier."
"The documentation is easy, and it helps us solve our problems."
More Visual Studio Test Professional pros
 

Cons

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."
"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."
"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."
"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."
"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."
"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."
"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."
"The data flow can be improved."
"It is not good in terms of performance. When you open Visual Studio, you have to wait for a while to process your code. It uses a lot of resources and has a lot of features. If we could disable some of the features, it would be lighter and faster to use. Nowadays, for some of the projects, we use VS Code for JavaScript or Python. VS Code is very light and easy to use, whereas, in Visual Studio, we have to wait because it takes time to compile or run a project. It has a lot of competitors in terms of performance, such as Intelligent ID. Intelligent ID is very easy to use. It has many features, and it is lighter to use than Visual Studio. In terms of error handling, sometimes, it shows an error before you finish your code, which can be improved. It would be good if it has a version for Linux. I use VS Code on Linux, but I am not sure if Visual Studio has a version for Linux."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"The Git extensions are very basic and can be more extensive compared to other software focused on Git, like GitTower or SmartGit."
"It is hard to learn, and you need to invest time to understand it."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"The solution's documentation could be improved for beginners."
"The price could be improved."
More Visual Studio Test Professional cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."
"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."
"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."
"I positioned it at a mid-range level. It isn't an inexpensive solution, but considering its capabilities, it represents excellent value for the functionalities it offers."
"It is a price-effective solution"
"The tool is affordable."
"We have licensing for Visual Studio Community edition."
"Our company pays a yearly licensing fee for Visual Studio Test Professional."
"There are two versions of Visual Studio Test Professional: Community and Professional. We are currently using the Community version, but if we start working on a commercial product, we will consider upgrading to the Professional version. We need to identify how we will proceed with our projects, and based on that, we will decide on our licensing."
"For the cloud services option, you buy a subscription per account or per user. This costs around $52 a month per person."
"The pricing is expensive."
More Visual Studio Test Professional pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
21%
Non Profit
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Real Estate/Law Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?
We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.
See all answers
What do you like most about Visual Studio Test Professional?
The most valuable features of the solution are its ease of use and availability.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Visual Studio Test Professional?
The tool is free, resulting in no costs associated with its use. The absence of price makes it cost-effective.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Visual Studio Test Professional?
The product needs contextual help integrated within its interface. Currently, I need to search online to find out how to use certain functions. This feature would save time by providing direct assi...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab Logo
Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Compared 22% of the time
Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab Logo
Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Compared 21% of the time
BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab Logo
BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Compared 17% of the time
Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab Logo
Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Compared 17% of the time
AWS Device Farm vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab Logo
AWS Device Farm vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab
Compared 12% of the time
More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Competitors
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Apache JMeter vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 23% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 16% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 14% of the time
Qt Squish vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Qt Squish vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 13% of the time
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional Logo
Tricentis qTest vs Visual Studio Test Professional
Compared 13% of the time
More Visual Studio Test Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT Digital Lab
April 2025
OpenText UFT Digital Lab reportDownload OpenText UFT Digital Lab product report
Buyer's Guide
Visual Studio Test Professional
April 2025
Visual Studio Test Professional reportDownload Visual Studio Test Professional product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center
No data available
 

Overview

Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.
OpenText
Visual Studio Professional Edition provides an IDE for all supported development languages. As of Visual Studio 2010, the Standard edition was dropped. MSDN support is available as MSDN Essentials or the full MSDN library depending on licensing. It supports XML and XSLT editing, and can create deployment packages that only use ClickOnce and MSI. It includes tools like Server Explorer and integration with Microsoft SQL Server also. Windows Mobile development support was included in Visual Studio 2005 Standard, however, with Visual Studio 2008, it is only available in Professional and higher editions. Windows Phone 7 development support was added to all editions in Visual Studio 2010. Development for Windows Mobile is no longer supported in Visual Studio 2010; it is superseded by Windows Phone 7.
Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB
Transport for Greater Manchester, Ordina, Bluegarden A/S, CLEAResult, Jet.com, OSIsoft, Australian Taxation Office, BookedOut, Tracasa
Buyer's Guide
OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
April 2025
Free Report: OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Visual Studio Test Professional
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Visual Studio Test Professional and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Visual Studio Test Professional report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.