OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 20.1% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Read 17 OpenText UFT Digital Lab reviews

598 Views
339 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 110 Tricentis Tosca reviews

14,913 Views
8,247 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and OpenText UFT Digital Lab are competitors in the test automation space. Tricentis Tosca seems to have the upper hand in model-based test automation and support for various technologies, while OpenText UFT Digital Lab shines in cross-browser and cross-device testing.

Features: Tricentis Tosca includes model-based test automation, AI-driven test maintenance, and automatic test case generation, which enhance adaptability and integration across platforms. OpenText UFT Digital Lab boasts robust cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities, real-time application testing in digital lab environments, and strong integration with cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could improve its cross-device testing support, enhance cloud integration features, and simplify its user interface to attract less technical users. OpenText UFT Digital Lab could work on expanding its support for complex integrations, improve initial setup time, and simplify the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers seamless deployment with wide integration options and is known for its responsive customer support. OpenText UFT Digital Lab simplifies setup through cloud-based deployment, praised for its adaptability to unique business needs and comprehensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is seen as cost-effective, with its pricing providing a favorable balance against ROI, focusing on reducing test cycle times and maintenance costs. OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is initially higher but offers significant ROI due to its scalability and testing capabilities, appealing to users seeking long-term investment benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Digital Lab is 0.9%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 20.1%, up from 16.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features

The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The product is easy to use."

"It's integrated with different technologies, desktop applications, package solutions like SAP, and mobile applications."

"This solution is easy to use for everybody, including those who are not IT-educated."

"Good use in Agile workshops, where the person needs to conceptualize the tests before the developer provides the complete application interface."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The product enables codeless automation."

"The most important feature is its ability to support the technical automation of specific clients that we cannot use with other tools."

"The most valuable feature is being able to create a test case by recording some scenarios and then leasing that task case to other scenarios."

"Multiple scanning engines to automate many different applications."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"The Vision AI implementation works very slowly, affecting the speed of our work."

"Tricentis Tosca could improve on the ease of use. There is a steep learning curve. The reporting section could be better and some of the new features could be simplified. Additionally, the user management of the client and the server are confusing. There should not be two."

"The document object model or some aspects of it has a bit of a learning curve."

"The solution should work with the Linux platform. Right now, it only runs on Windows."

"The UI does not have the option of automating the scroll bars."

"Making it more stable would be good because we get around 90% stability."

"Tricentis Tosca is expensive. It should improve the testing of legacy systems and interfaces."

"The solution is expensive compared to other tools in the market."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"Tricentis Tosca may be relatively on the higher side in terms of pricing, but their sales rep can give pretty decent deals when asked."

"A competitor of Tricentis Tosca: Katalon Studio, is very similar and offers lower pricing, though Tricentis Tosca offers more features and benefits."

"It is expensive."

"Although the product is slightly more expensive than tools, its automation capabilities and reduced scripting needs justify the cost."

"I am satisfied with the cost."

"The price of Tricentis Tosca is approximately Є10,000 for one license. However, it used to be much cheaper, but they changed their license structure. It used to be a structure where if you bought a license you would receive one year of free support and maintenance. Now they only have a yearly license, and that is expensive."

"I rate the price of Tricentis Tosca a two out of five."

"There are different types of licenses: enterprise or professional. The cost varies."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

21%

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 22% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 21% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 17% of the time

Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 17% of the time

AWS Device Farm vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Competitors

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

April 2025

Download OpenText UFT Digital Lab product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.