OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while Tricentis is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in FT, compared to Tricentis’s 19.7% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Read 17 OpenText UFT Digital Lab reviews

604 Views
261 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

Tricentis Tosca

Read 110 Tricentis Tosca reviews

13,710 Views
4,387 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Tricentis Tosca

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Tricentis Tosca and OpenText UFT Digital Lab are competitors in the test automation space. Tricentis Tosca seems to have the upper hand in model-based test automation and support for various technologies, while OpenText UFT Digital Lab shines in cross-browser and cross-device testing.

Features: Tricentis Tosca includes model-based test automation, AI-driven test maintenance, and automatic test case generation, which enhance adaptability and integration across platforms. OpenText UFT Digital Lab boasts robust cross-browser and cross-device testing capabilities, real-time application testing in digital lab environments, and strong integration with cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: Tricentis Tosca could improve its cross-device testing support, enhance cloud integration features, and simplify its user interface to attract less technical users. OpenText UFT Digital Lab could work on expanding its support for complex integrations, improve initial setup time, and simplify the learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tricentis Tosca offers seamless deployment with wide integration options and is known for its responsive customer support. OpenText UFT Digital Lab simplifies setup through cloud-based deployment, praised for its adaptability to unique business needs and comprehensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Tricentis Tosca is seen as cost-effective, with its pricing providing a favorable balance against ROI, focusing on reducing test cycle times and maintenance costs. OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is initially higher but offers significant ROI due to its scalability and testing capabilities, appealing to users seeking long-term investment benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Tricentis Tosca

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

1st

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

110

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (2nd), Test Automation Tools (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Digital Lab is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 19.7%, up from 17.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

PrabhuKrishnamoorthy

Senior Director at Ascendion

Has transformed testing by reducing scripting effort and enhancing productivity with advanced features

The self-healing feature of Tricentis Tosca needs significant improvement. Currently, it is static and not dynamic. For example, if a button in an application changes, Tricentis Tosca should be smart enough to detect the change and still execute the script seamlessly. Improvements are needed to ensure it responds dynamically to changes in the application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The product is easy to use."

"The product's initial setup phase was easy."

"Tricentis Tosca is a really cool tool that you don't have to be technical to use it. Additionally, the solution is easy to use. The modules, libraries, and reusable are in an efficient way to update all the tests. I find it spot on with that. We also started using the design which we switched from Excel. The design was superior to Excel."

"The model-based scriptless automation is the most valuable feature because it needs less maintenance as compared to script-based automation."

"It is easy to automate tasks, highly flexible, straightforward to learn, and easy to maintain."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"The mainframe testing and UI automation are the most valuable aspects of the solution."

"The scriptless automation tool is one of the important features."

"The tool can be handled without any knowledge in parameterisation, especially the TestCaseDesign which makes the tool mighty and stable."

More Tricentis Tosca pros

Cons

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"The product is not very stable when used with cloud storage. It is very hard to load the screen, making it difficult to use the tool in cloud storage."

"Running the regression – if multiple lists are executed at once or if a list contains 200+ tests, it’s a pain to stop the execution."

"We faced some hardships in implementing the solution because of integration."

"A disadvantage of Tricentis Tosca is that you have to customize it according to your need, during the early stages of the software, particularly during upstream testing, before system and unit testing."

"The support we received from Tricentis Tosca was good, but it can improve."

"ScratchBook execution needs to be improved as Tosca crashes multiple times."

"Very difficult to get information about licensing costs."

"I would like to be able to manage different projects in one repository or have better data exchange between repositories."

More Tricentis Tosca cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"We have around 200 [concurrent] licenses and the cost around $1.4 million a year."

"The tool is quite expensive."

"We hired a consultant to figure out all the tools in our company and how they fit in our company before we purchased the solution."

"Pricing for Tricentis Tosca could be improved because it's very expensive."

"A competitor of Tricentis Tosca: Katalon Studio, is very similar and offers lower pricing, though Tricentis Tosca offers more features and benefits."

"I'm not sure if I'm at liberty to talk about the pricing, but it has some significant costs. For example, you have to pay a license and maintenance fee. Then the rest of the terms are negotiable. We have to consider what we need and what benefit we get from it."

"Tricentis Tosca should improve its pricing. It is expensive."

More Tricentis Tosca pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

20%

Non Profit

10%

Healthcare Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

See all answers

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?

Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...

See all answers

What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?

For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 20% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 16% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 16% of the time

Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 15% of the time

AWS Device Farm vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Competitors

Worksoft Certify vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 11% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 10% of the time

Testim vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 8% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs Tricentis Tosca

Compared 7% of the time

More Tricentis Tosca Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

May 2025

Download OpenText UFT Digital Lab product report

Buyer's Guide

Tricentis Tosca

May 2025

Download Tricentis Tosca product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.

OpenText

Tricentis Tosca is primarily leveraged for test automation across web, SAP, API, and mainframe applications, offering robust support for both regression and functional testing.

Tricentis Tosca's test automation capabilities extend to front-end and back-end testing, including processes like RPA and UI-based regression tests on Microsoft Windows. It supports Agile environments with multiple applications, enabling Salesforce automation, API endpoints, and end-to-end automation workflows. Tosca caters to diverse testing needs, integrating well with tools like Jenkins and Bamboo, although upgrades and customizations present challenges. Licensing costs and performance issues during loading and scanning are concerns, along with substantial learning curves for new users. Enhanced AI features and better reporting are on users' wishlist.

What are the key features of Tricentis Tosca?

Tosca BI: Ensures data integrity and accuracy in business intelligence testing
Tosca Commander: Centralized control for easy test management and maintenance
Model-Based Test Automation: Facilitates test creation without scripting
Integration Capabilities: Works seamlessly with Jenkins and Bamboo for CI/CD
Diverse Application Support: Compatible with mobile, web, APIs, and SAP
Scriptless Nature: Simplifies usage and reduces maintenance efforts

What benefits should users consider?

Enhanced Automation: Streamlines testing processes, saving time and resources
Scalability: Adapts to growing demands within an organization
Test Management: Centralized control enhances efficiency and oversight
Ease of Use: Scriptless approach lowers the barrier to entry for users

Tricentis Tosca is implemented across various industries, serving sectors like finance, healthcare, and retail with test automation solutions to ensure application quality and reliability. Agile teams in these industries benefit from its multi-application support and ability to manage complex end-to-end testing workflows. The tool's integration capabilities are particularly useful in environments that rely on CI/CD pipelines, ensuring continuous testing and quick feedback loops.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca

May 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. Tricentis Tosca report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors, best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors, and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.