OpenText Functional Testing for Developers and Ranorex Studio compete in the realm of software test automation. Currently, Ranorex Studio appears to have an edge due to its ease of use and flexibility, particularly beneficial for smaller teams or those with less technical expertise.
Features: OpenText Functional Testing supports complex algorithms, robust DevOps integration, and wide protocol support. Ranorex Studio offers user-friendliness, support for C# and VB.NET, and features such as Ranorex Spy and mobile testing, making it accessible for non-developers.
Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing could improve its stability and integration functions, expand browser compatibility, and support more technologies like Oracle ERP. Ranorex Studio users seek better support for operating systems beyond Windows, improved coding interfaces, and better browser compatibility.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing offers versatile deployment options, though its customer service has improved recently but remains inconsistent. Ranorex Studio provides flexible deployment on Windows, but its support team receives mixed reviews, with some users experiencing slow response times.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing is often seen as costly with high licensing fees, valuable for large enterprises. Ranorex Studio offers more affordable pricing with flexible licensing, appealing to smaller companies. Both products demonstrate significant ROI through automation, with Ranorex's multi-license pricing attractive for large teams.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing for Developers | 2.9% |
| Ranorex Studio | 3.3% |
| Other | 93.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 29 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
OpenText Functional Testing for Developers offers robust automation capabilities with support for complex algorithms, multi-platform testing, and developer-friendly integration using C# and Java, facilitating seamless testing transitions and efficient automation workflows.
This testing tool is highly valued for its integration with ALM and Jenkins, along with its developer-focused environment adaptable to Eclipse and Visual Studio. With AI-based object recognition, an object repository, and test framework integration, it bolsters DevOps practices while reducing IT workloads. Supporting UFT to LeanFT transition, it caters to SAP, Java, .NET environments, and more. Enhanced with stable automation, extensive protocol support, and both on-premises and cloud deployments, it targets performance, regression, and functional testing, while recording and screengrabs enhance automation capabilities. Future improvements could include expanded browser compatibility, enhanced JavaScript and mobile support, and better object recognition.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing for Developers?Organizations implement OpenText Functional Testing for complex test automation on desktop, web, and banking applications, supporting performance, regression, and functionality testing across environments like SAP, Java, and .NET. UFT aids in GUI, infrastructure, and ERP application automation, with deployment options including on-premises and cloud implementations. Enhanced screengrabs and recording features aid in practical test case development, while addressing emerging technology needs is a focus.
Ranorex is a leading software development company that offers innovative test automation software. Ranorex makes testing easy, saves time in the testing process and empowers clients to ensure the highest quality of their products. Its flexible tools and quick ROI make it the ideal choice for companies of virtually any size – and this is why thousands of clients in over 60 countries trust in its excellence.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
