OpenText Trading Grid vs Tungsten RPA comparison

OpenText and Tungsten Automation are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Additionally, 50% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

OpenText Trading Grid

Read 1 OpenText Trading Grid review

67 Views
2 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 26 Tungsten RPA reviews

1,583 Views
574 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Trading Grid

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OpenText Trading Grid and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Salesforce and others in Cloud Data Integration.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Data Integration Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,278 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Trading Grid

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (12th), Cloud Data Integration (36th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (19th)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (12th)

Featured Reviews

VARUNKUMAR

Mgr Value Chain Integration/EDI at a non-tech company with 10,001+ employees

Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines

The good thing about OpenText is that we have the mapping specification guideline available, which is not there in a solution like SEEBURGER. Whenever you want to take a decision to move away from OpenText, you have already documented your mapping and what your mapping looks like. So you go to the next provider, provide them with that mapping specification, and it'll be very easy for them to develop a new map instead of just taking the data - input data, output data - and then looking for how the data is getting transformed. So you have the mapping spec level which is a very good feature of OpenText, which we do not have in SEEBURGER. It's very hard to move from SEEBURGER. The solution is easy to implement. It's stable and reliable. They are the industry leaders in the integration space.

Read full review

Jamil Milhem

Project Manager-Senior RPA Specialist at DEWA

Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection

I have worked with Microsoft Power Platform and UiPath. Kofax RPA offers a comprehensive solution with built-in capabilities for executing tasks like running Excel files and web automation without additional servers. They provide their browsers and extensions. For functions such as OCR, image processing, and data extraction, Kofax has built-in features powered by their engine, eliminating the need for subscriptions to external technologies like Microsoft Cognitive Services or Google Search. One of Kofax RPA's strongest features is its on-premise solution, which is particularly beneficial for organizations operating in regions with data regulations, such as the UAE.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to implement."

"You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it."

"The pricing of the solution is quite good."

"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."

"Initially, the most effective features for process automation were website automation related to web auditing, SharePoint implementations, and automated management of information."

"The flexibility to use already-developed components is really good. You can use it for Excel-related operations and other things."

"The tool's most valuable feature is web browser automation, which makes it easy to interact with any website. We can assemble a robot in a few hours with web automation, depending on its complexity."

"It is stable and scalable."

"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"Technical support needs to be better."

"Exception handling needs to be improved."

"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."

"The solution could use some AI integrated features."

"It needs a free training portal for anybody on the internet to use so that they can get an idea of what the possibilities are."

"Its documentation is not widely available on the web. They should work on the availability of its documentation. In Automation Anywhere, there is a feature called Discovery Bot that automatically records the process steps and suggests a possible bot. I am not sure if such a feature is available in Kofax. If it is not available, it will be very good to have this feature. "

"The solution needs to be scalable."

"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."

"The product has some constraints and performance issues."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The normal price for an on-premises license is €50,000. That's the price for one robot license. You can have more than one robot license but only one can be run at any one time. I believe the cost of adding a second robot is around €14,000."

"The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours used and the scale of automation required.......With Kofax, you purchase a license upfront, and that's all you need. You can create as many automation workflows as you require without additional costs for individual use cases."

"I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."

"There is a standard license needed to use Kofax RPA and the price is reasonable."

"The cost depends on the number of licenses and the number of RPAs."

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,278 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Retailer

11%

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

The pricing models across the market initially differed significantly, as most RPA implementations were licensed on a per bot basis, unlike Tungsten RPA, which uses a server-based model. Though the...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

Automation of complex processes involving stable legacy systems could be a major plus. The biggest issue lies in the stability of the target environment. Automating systems based on Citrix, where u...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 30% of the time

SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 26% of the time

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 15% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 12% of the time

SAP Cloud Platform vs OpenText Trading Grid

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Trading Grid Competitors

UiPath Platform vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 34% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 12% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 10% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 8% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business-to-Business Middleware

May 2025

Download OpenText Trading Grid product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

May 2025

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

Trading Grid, GXS Trading Grid

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Overview

OpenText Trading Grid (formerly GXS) is a unique global integration platform that enables and streamlines cross enterprise business processes. With extreme flexibility and a service-oriented, business-to-business e-commerce platform, the Grid helps companies automate global trading communities by shielding complexity from rapidly changing standards, eliminating manual and duplicative efforts and enabling a new level of process integration and business intelligence.

OpenText

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Tungsten Automation

Sample Customers

Autoliv, Hella, Hutchinson, Michelin

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Data Integration

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Informatica, Salesforce and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,278 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.