OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs ReShaper comparison

OpenText and JetBrains are both solutions in the Static Code Analysis category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.5, while JetBrains is ranked #13. OpenText holds a 5.0% mindshare in SCAS, compared to JetBrains’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of JetBrains users who would recommend it.

OpenText Static Application...

Read 19 OpenText Static Application Security Testing reviews

4,284 Views
1,714 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ReShaper

Read 2 ReShaper reviews

568 Views
568 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Static Application...

ReShaper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Static Application Security Testing and ReShaper compete in software development tools. ReShaper has the upper hand due to superior code analysis, despite OpenText's advantages in security solutions, pricing, and support.

Features: OpenText Static Application Security Testing includes robust security scanning, integration capabilities suitable for large enterprises, and a focus on security attributes. ReShaper offers intelligent code analysis, refactoring capabilities, and seamless IDE integration, enhancing developer productivity.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a flexible deployment model and strong customer service for smooth enterprise integration. ReShaper, while simple to deploy, has customer service that may not match OpenText's comprehensive support. OpenText's deployment efficiency gives an edge, though ReShaper's simplicity benefits smaller teams.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Static Application Security Testing has higher initial setup costs with long-term ROI due to extensive security features. ReShaper offers affordable setup with quick ROI, making it attractive for smaller teams prioritizing immediate productivity gains. OpenText may be costlier initially, while ReShaper's affordability suits developers seeking cost-effectiveness.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Static Application...

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ReShaper

Ranking in Static Code Analysis

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Static Code Analysis category, the mindshare of OpenText Static Application Security Testing is 5.0%, down from 11.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReShaper is 2.3%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Code Analysis Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Static Application Security Testing	5.0%
ReShaper	2.3%
Other	92.7%

Static Code Analysis

Featured Reviews

Dristi Kurre

Lead Information Security Analyst at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Focuses on detailed scans to find critical vulnerabilities while ensuring minimal false positives

I think Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be improved by updating the number of rule packs according to the latest vulnerabilities we find each year. We have updated to a version that is one less than the current latest version. It would be really helpful to include trending vulnerabilities and how to manage them. While it includes all the OWASP top factors, AI has come into the picture, so those updates should also be considered. I haven't thought much about additional features for improvement since I am using it daily. Most of our work revolves around scanning and providing the results, which sometimes feels like a crunch. However, I believe rule pack updates should be implemented. It feels easy to upgrade to the latest version as well.

Read full review

reviewer937347

Sr. Test Engineering Manager - Embedded Linux SW / RF at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Beneficial real-time scanning, reliable, and overall good processing

ReShaper is a static code analysis tool The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system. ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability is good; I'm not running into anything that gives me a problem as far as my pipelines are concerned, and for what I use it for, it is sufficient and I get the results that I'm looking for."

"Fortify Static Code Analyzer tells us if there are any security leaks or not. If there are, then it's notifying us and does not allow us to pass the DevOps pipeline. If it is finds everything's perfect, as per our given guidelines, then it is allowing us to go ahead and start it, and we are able to deploy it."

"Fortify integrates with various development environments and tools, such as IDEs (Integrated Development Environments) and CI/CD pipelines."

"It's helped us free up staff time."

"I recommend this product due to its good pricing, extensive language support, valuable features, and additional features like Fortify Academy."

"I like the Fortify taxonomy as it provides us with a list of all of the vulnerabilities found, and Fortify releases updated rule packs quarterly, with accompanying documentation, that lets us know what new features are being released."

"We've found the documentation to be very good."

"I like Fortify Software Security Center or Fortify SSC. This tool is installed on each developer's machine, but Fortify Software Security Center combines everything. We can meet there as security professionals and developers. The developers scan their code and publish the results there. We can then look at them from a security perspective and see whether they fixed the issues. We can agree on whether something is a false positive and make decisions."

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing pros

"Once you get used to working with the ReShaper, you can't get enough of it."

"The most valuable feature of ReShaper is that it provides continuously scanning of the data in real-time. ReShaper has a really good mechanism and process, they have a decent system."

"It comes with many features and supports almost all of the coding languages available."

Cons

"I'm not sure if Fortify Static Code Analyzer has AI capabilities. Currently, this solution doesn't quite have what we need."

"The price can be improved."

"The pricing is a bit high. It would be nice if it was more competitive."

"The generation of false positives should be reduced."

"The product shows false positives for Python applications."

"I know the areas that they are trying to improve on. They've been getting feedback for several years. There are two main points. The first thing is keeping current with static code languages. I know it is difficult because code languages pop up all the time or there are new variants, but it is something that Fortify needs to put a better focus on. They need to keep current with their language support. The second thing is a philosophical issue, and I don't know if they'll ever change it. They've done a decent job of putting tools in place to mitigate things, but static code analysis is inherently noisy. If you just take a tool out of the box and run a scan, you're going to get a lot of results back, and not all of those results are interesting or important, which is different for every organization. Currently, we get four to five errors on the side of tagging, and it notifies you of every tiny inconsistency. If the tool sees something that it doesn't know, it flags, which becomes work that has to be done afterward. Clients don't typically like it. There has got to be a way of prioritizing. There are a ton of filter options within Fortify, but the problem is that you've got to go through the crazy noisy scan once before you know which filters you need to put in place to get to the interesting stuff. I keep hearing from their product team that they're working on a way to do container or docker scanning. That's a huge market mover. A lot of people are interested in that right now, and it is relevant. That is definitely something that I'd love to see in the next version or two."

"I have not seen a return on investment with Fortify Static Code Analyzer."

"Fortify's software security center needs a design refresh."

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing cons

"When it's integrated with a weak server machine, the performance isn't that great. It starts up slowly and even crashes at times."

"ReShaper could improve by increasing the performance of the scans. Their application is taking too much CPU. The processing is taking too many CPU resources which causes the system to slow down."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has a couple of license models. The one that we use most frequently is called their flexible deployment. We use this one because it is flexible and based on the number of code-contributing developers in the organization. It includes almost everything in the Fortify suite for one developer price. It gives access to not just the secure code analyzer (SCA) but also to FSC, the secure code. It gives us accessibility to scan central, which is the decentralized scanning farm. It also gives us access to the software security center, which is the vulnerability management platform."

"I rate the pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer as a seven out of ten since it is a bit expensive."

"There is a licensing fee, and if you bring them to the company and you want them to do the installation and the implementation in the beginning, there is a separate cost. Similarly, if you want consultation or training, there is a separate cost. I see it as suitable only for enterprises. I do not see it suitable for a small business or individual use."

"The licensing is expensive and is in the 50K range."

"Although I am not responsible for the budget, Fortify SAST is expensive."

"The setup costs and pricing for Fortify may vary depending on the organization's needs and requirements."

"The price of Fortify Static Code Analyzer could be reduced."

"From our standpoint, we are significantly better off with Fortify due to the favorable pricing we secured five years ago."

"As far as I know, the licensing isn't very cheap."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Code Analysis solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good. We have the scan machines, and we are planning to request more from Micro Focus now. We have calls every month or every oth...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortify Static Code Analyzer?

Our main use cases for Fortify Static Code Analyzer typically involve trying to figure out the critical vulnerabilities. It depends on the type of scans that we are doing, whether it is a release s...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Black Duck SCA vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 10% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 10% of the time

Semgrep vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 7% of the time

JFrog Xray vs OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Static Application Security Testing Competitors

Whole Tomato Visual Assist vs ReShaper

Compared 29% of the time

Veracode vs ReShaper

Compared 24% of the time

Klocwork vs ReShaper

Compared 9% of the time

PyCharm vs ReShaper

Compared 9% of the time

Checkmarx One vs ReShaper

Compared 7% of the time

More ReShaper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

June 2026

OpenText Static Application Security Testing report

Download OpenText Static Application Security Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

Static Code Analysis

May 2026

Download ReShaper product report

Also Known As

Fortify Static Code Analysis SAST

No data available

Overview

OpenText Static Application Security Testing empowers teams with efficient vulnerability detection and streamlined secure coding practices, offering comprehensive language support and seamless integration with development tools.

OpenText Static Application Security Testing enhances software security during development by accurately identifying vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. It integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, making it highly efficient for early detection of security issues. Users benefit from its easy setup, clear documentation, and centralized portal for managing security findings. Despite facing challenges like high costs and complex configurations for certain languages, its role in facilitating compliance and streamlining secure coding processes is indispensable. Improvements are needed in areas such as outdated design, language support, and integration capabilities to meet evolving user expectations.

What features does OpenText Static Application Security Testing offer?

Seamless IDE Integration: Integrates effortlessly with development environments for real-time feedback.
Comprehensive Language Support: Covers a wide range of programming languages, enhancing detection accuracy.
Centralized Security Portal: Provides a streamlined interface for managing vulnerabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Enhanced Security: Identifies vulnerabilities early, preventing potential breaches.
Time Efficiency: Automates processes and speeds up remediation efforts.
Compliance Facilitation: Assists in adhering to security standards and regulations.

Organizations across diverse sectors implement OpenText Static Application Security Testing primarily to secure applications during development phases. Its integration with tools like GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps ensures a robust security pipeline. By combining with Sonatype Nexus, secure code, and library management is achieved effectively.

OpenText

ReShaper is designed to streamline code refactoring, optimize workflows, and enhance productivity for developers. It provides a suite of integrated tools that facilitate seamless code editing and comprehension.

ReShaper caters to development teams seeking efficient code management. Its robust features support refactoring, navigation, and code analysis. Built to enhance efficiency, ReShaper supports multiple programming languages, offering vital solutions tailored for modern development environments. Its tools reduce manual effort, fostering streamlined coding practices and improved software quality. Suitable for both small teams and large enterprises, ReShaper adapts to different project needs.

What are the key features of ReShaper?

Code Analysis: Identifies issues and suggests improvements.
Refactoring: Streamlines code restructuring to uphold quality.
Navigation: Quick access to code elements improves efficiency.
Code Editing: Offers comprehensive coding assistance.
Integration: Seamless support with popular IDEs enhances user experience.

What are the benefits or ROI from using ReShaper?

Improved Code Quality: Ensures high standards and mitigates errors.
Increased Productivity: Reduces development time through automated processes.
Efficient Workflow: Enhances team collaboration with integrated tools.
Cost-Effective: Reduces manual effort, bringing value to development initiatives.

In industries like software development and technology, ReShaper is used to elevate coding standards and optimize project timelines. Its implementation in sectors demanding high-quality coding results in reduced errors and improved software delivery times, contributing to a more reliable and efficient development process.

JetBrains

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper

April 2026

Free Report: OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ReShaper report.

See our list of best Static Code Analysis vendors.

We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.