Mend.io and OpenText Static Application Security Testing are competing in the Static Application Security Testing category. Based on user reviews, Mend.io has a slight edge due to its automation and efficiency.
Features: Mend.io offers advanced CVE detection, open-source dependency scanning, and detailed license reports. This provides comprehensive risk management insights and integrates effectively with CI/CD pipelines, supporting multiple programming languages. OpenText SAST supports numerous languages and integrates well with IDEs and CI/CD systems, providing a robust static code analysis ecosystem.
Room for Improvement: Mend.io can improve scalability, UI, and language support, with users suggesting enhancement in container scanning. OpenText SAST can reduce complexity and cost, improve ease of use, and address false positives, also improving plugin integration and vulnerability prioritization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mend.io's public cloud deployment offers flexibility and is praised for strong customer service and technical support. OpenText, available in on-premises and hybrid configurations, receives varied feedback on its customer service, with some users noting room for improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Mend.io is cost-effective with competitive pricing, boosting ROI through efficient vulnerability and license management. OpenText is considered more expensive, with its robust features praised, but concerns over ROI exist due to higher costs.
Mend.io has provided a good return on investment by significantly reducing vulnerabilities.
They prioritize providing the best experience to large organizations like ours, belonging to the Fortune 100.
The customer service and support for Fortify Static Code Analyzer are better than those for LoadRunner.
The technical support has been good because we always received answers to our questions.
Fortify Static Code Analyzer integrates well and is scalable.
AI integration in code security tools like Mend.io is still in its early stages and relatively immature.
The stability of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is generally good.
I would rate the product stability as an eight.
The actual challenge is how easy it is to integrate it in the early phase of the software development life cycle.
The organization decided to consolidate tools and chose Snyk since it provides multiple functionalities in one solution.
We would appreciate if the AI could give us more information about improvements and reduce the number of false positives, but this solution doesn't have this function yet.
It would be really helpful to include trending vulnerabilities and how to manage them.
It should be easier to install, perhaps through a container-based approach where everything is combined into one image or pack of containers.
The cost of Mend.io is competitive, being quite low compared to others.
The pricing of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is good, with a flexible model that allows customers to choose a setup that suits their needs.
My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing has been good.
We find it 100% accurate in detecting vulnerabilities.
It handles Application Security, performing SCA SAST and container scanning.
Fortify Static Code Analyzer has the capability of giving fewer false positives compared to other tools.
The most impactful feature of Fortify Static Code Analyzer in identifying vulnerabilities is the ratio of total number of vulnerabilities to false positives.
The most valuable feature of Fortify Static Code Analyzer is its extensive language support, covering many languages from legacy ones to the newest.
Mend.io is a software composition analysis tool that secures what developers create. The solution provides an automated reduction of the software attack surface, reduces developer burdens, and accelerates app delivery. Mend.io provides open-source analysis with its in-house and other multiple sources of software vulnerabilities. In addition, the solution offers license and policy violation alerts, has great pipeline integration, and, since it is a SaaS (software as a service), it doesn’t require you to physically maintain servers or data centers for any implementation. Not only does Mend.io reduce enterprise application security risk, it also helps developers meet deadlines faster.
Mend.io Features
Mend.io has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Mend.io Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Mend.io. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the Mend.io solution.
Jeffrey H., System Manager of Cloud Engineering at Common Spirit, says, “Finding vulnerabilities is pretty easy. Mend.io (formerly WhiteSource) does a great job of that and we had quite a few when we first put this in place. Mend.io does a very good job of finding the open-source, checking the versions, and making sure they're secure. They notify us of critical high, medium, and low impacts, and if anything is wrong. We find the product very easy to use and we use it as a core part of our strategy for scanning product code moving toward release.”
PeerSpot reviewer Ben D., Head of Software Engineering at a legal firm, mentions, “The way WhiteSource scans the code is great. It’s easy to identify and remediate open source vulnerabilities using this solution. WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since we adopted the product. In terms of integration, it's pretty easy.”
An IT Service Manager at a wholesaler/distributor comments, “Mend.io provides threat detection and an excellent UI in a highly stable solution, with outstanding technical support.”
Another reviewer, Kevin D., Intramural OfficialIntramural at Northeastern University, states, "The vulnerability analysis is the best aspect of the solution."
OpenText Static Application Security Testing empowers teams with efficient vulnerability detection and streamlined secure coding practices, offering comprehensive language support and seamless integration with development tools.
OpenText Static Application Security Testing enhances software security during development by accurately identifying vulnerabilities with minimal false positives. It integrates seamlessly with IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, making it highly efficient for early detection of security issues. Users benefit from its easy setup, clear documentation, and centralized portal for managing security findings. Despite facing challenges like high costs and complex configurations for certain languages, its role in facilitating compliance and streamlining secure coding processes is indispensable. Improvements are needed in areas such as outdated design, language support, and integration capabilities to meet evolving user expectations.
What features does OpenText Static Application Security Testing offer?Organizations across diverse sectors implement OpenText Static Application Security Testing primarily to secure applications during development phases. Its integration with tools like GitLab, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps ensures a robust security pipeline. By combining with Sonatype Nexus, secure code, and library management is achieved effectively.
We monitor all Static Code Analysis reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.