OpenText SiteScope vs Sentry comparison

OpenText and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #31 with an average rating of 8.5, while Sentry is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 6.9% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

OpenText SiteScope

Read 27 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,474 Views
632 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 13 Sentry reviews

9,828 Views
8,363 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Sentry are both robust monitoring solutions focused on different needs. OpenText SiteScope has the upper hand in comprehensive monitoring capabilities, while Sentry stands out for its agile error tracking and ease of use.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope provides wide monitoring capabilities, covering infrastructure, applications, and services. Sentry offers exceptional error tracking, seamless integration capabilities, and intuitive use.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope requires enhancements in interface simplicity, reporting capabilities, and customization options. Sentry needs improved performance monitoring features, enhanced alerting mechanisms, and more robust error tracking.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope’s deployment can be complex due to its extensive configurations, with users noting responsive customer service but a steep learning curve. Sentry’s deployment is straightforward with supportive customer service, ensuring a smoother onboarding experience.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope represents a higher initial investment, justified by its extensive capabilities, offering substantial long-term ROI. Sentry is a more cost-effective solution, particularly beneficial for smaller teams, providing quick returns with its efficient error monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,585 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

31st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 6.9%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts

There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.

Read full review

Abdullah Baig

Software Dev at AF AB

An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing

Sentry was easy to learn compared to New Relic and Azure Monitor. I saw some valuable input. It took us the least amount of time to see how Sentry is valuable. It took just a few minutes. Session Replay provides a replay of the recorded errors. It is a good feature. Azure Monitor does not have this feature. The error reporting is straightforward. We can see everything that we need to see. The dashboard seems pretty fine. The product performs well. We can see the user's IP addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration."

"It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."

"I find OpenText SiteScope itself to be uncomplicated and deserving of a ten out of ten due to its simplicity."

"The stability of the Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope is good."

"Our experiences with Micro Focus SiteScope have been mostly positive as we can easily work with multiple monitors and different types of monitors pretty quickly. There are a lot of out-of-the-box solutions for us through Micro Focus SiteScope, so we don't have to do that much custom coding for the vast majority of requests that we get for monitoring. There are some limitations that we've run into and some problems every once in a while, but they've been relatively minor."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText SiteScope is that it is easy to manage and user-friendly."

"It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."

"The system is really powerful; instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

"The solution is user-friendly."

"Its initial setup process is relatively straightforward."

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

"Sentry is more accurate than some other tools such as Datadog because it has more integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira, or other ticketing tools."

"It's a great visibility tool for the developer team."

"Great for capturing application performance metrics and error logs."

"The product performs well."

"I would rate the stability of Sentry as eight out of ten."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"We'd like a uniform interface for monitoring our system, since that's the purpose of SiteScope."

"We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location."

"I would be very interested in having transaction traceability included in the product, to give us a better view of what is really going wrong in a particular method and action."

"There is a need to enhance the reporting feature in OpenText SiteScope. Reporting related to performance information for historical data needs improvement to provide better reporting related to application availability and end node availability."

"Full application functionality available via the API. There are some functions you can perform managing monitors, that are only available through the UI."

"They should provide more templates for new vendor devices."

"They need to offer better technical support, which, right now, is not helpful or responsive."

"The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

"The price could be lowered."

"To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features."

"We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved."

"Lacks user metric tracking and the ability to create more dashboards."

"I would like to see a role registration feature added."

"The settings for an administrator are complex."

"The log centralization and analysis could be improved in Sentry."

"Its debugging feature needs to be faster."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

33%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

19%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability.

See all answers

What do you like most about Sentry?

The product performs well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Sentry is very affordable. We spend less than $200 to $300 a month. Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

Right now, Sentry meets our needs and we have not encountered any bottlenecks. However, additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

OmniPeek vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

Prometheus Group vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 21% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 13% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Sentry

Compared 10% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 10% of the time

Dynatrace vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

March 2025

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

June 2025

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

No data available

Overview

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sentry is a tool for monitoring web and application performance, tracking errors, processing request times, and managing user data access.

Developers integrate Sentry with web and application environments to capture front-end and back-end errors, utilize error logs, trace requests, and observe metrics without real-time production access. Sentry's use extends to monitoring internal applications, leveraging CyberArk PAM integration, deploying notifications, and detecting silent failures. Users benefit from detailed error and performance reports, contextual cause-stack information, and real-time breakdowns. There is room for improvement, as users desire refined integration and administrative settings, enhanced alert policies, and more customization in event metrics.

What are Sentry's most important features?

Integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira for smoother workflow
Detailed error and performance reports for clearer insights
AWS Lambda compatibility for cloud functions
Contextual cause-stack information helps pinpoint issues
Real-time breakdowns for immediate data
Session Replay for reviewing user sessions

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Sentry?

Efficient error tracking and monitoring improves application stability
Integration with major tools enhances team collaboration
User-friendly interfaces deliver a smooth learning curve
Security features provide peace of mind
ETL pipeline orchestration streamlines data handling

Sentry is implemented across industries ranging from tech startups to large enterprises. These organizations use Sentry to enhance application reliability, track performance, and secure user data within protected environments. Integration with CyberArk PAM ensures secure deployment. Organizations find Sentry useful for monitoring internal applications, efficiently processing request times, and tracing changes in production without direct access.

Sentry

Sample Customers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

June 2025

Free Report: OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,585 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.