OpenText SiteScope vs Sentry comparison

OpenText and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 9.2, while Sentry is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

OpenText SiteScope

Read 29 OpenText SiteScope reviews

2,201 Views
1,981 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 14 Sentry reviews

8,413 Views
7,908 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Sentry are both robust monitoring solutions focused on different needs. OpenText SiteScope has the upper hand in comprehensive monitoring capabilities, while Sentry stands out for its agile error tracking and ease of use.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope provides wide monitoring capabilities, covering infrastructure, applications, and services. Sentry offers exceptional error tracking, seamless integration capabilities, and intuitive use.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope requires enhancements in interface simplicity, reporting capabilities, and customization options. Sentry needs improved performance monitoring features, enhanced alerting mechanisms, and more robust error tracking.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope’s deployment can be complex due to its extensive configurations, with users noting responsive customer service but a steep learning curve. Sentry’s deployment is straightforward with supportive customer service, ensuring a smoother onboarding experience.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope represents a higher initial investment, justified by its extensive capabilities, offering substantial long-term ROI. Sentry is a more cost-effective solution, particularly beneficial for smaller teams, providing quick returns with its efficient error monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.8%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 3.0%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Sentry	3.0%
OpenText SiteScope	0.8%
Other	96.2%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts

There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.

Read full review

NelsonMendaros1

Founding Member at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Real-time error tracking assists the QA team in swiftly identifying and reporting bugs

One of the greatest advantages of Sentry is its support for Azure Web Services, which New Relic does not support. Sentry integrates with common developer communication platforms like Discord and WhatsApp, which allows developers to easily track notifications and findings in the applications. Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient."

"There's no agent you need installed on the servers. In our environment, we have some servers out of our control so we cannot manage them. We use SiteScope to monitor the availability, the resources on the servers, etc. This allows us to do this job without installing agents so there's no need to take care of anything on the server."

"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."

"SiteScope is deployed on our network perimeter, and gives our operations teams an end user perspective of service availability."

"VM monitoring is pretty good showing good visualizations of how VMs are operating within the context of all the VMs running on the same hypervisor."

"It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration."

"The product's ability to monitor systems and applications and send alerts and create support tickets are the most valuable features of the product."

"The biggest benefit I see from OpenText SiteScope is that it is a very professional tool, and it helps me greatly."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The product performs well."

"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create and assign rules and give access to particular users."

"Sentry is a pretty stable product... Sentry's documentation is pretty straightforward and neat."

"Overall, I give Sentry a rating of 10."

"It's a great visibility tool for the developer team."

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"It could be more reliable using a database repository instead of a log repository."

"I think that the scalability needs to be worked on a bit. We can scale fine horizontally, but we’d like to scale less horizontal and be more compact."

"We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location."

"May require a dashboard for the data collected"

"It could be more reliable using a database repository instead of a log repository."

"In terms of issues with Micro Focus SiteScope, some that we've run into were unintended, for example, extra executions of monitors and some false alerts when there were problems connecting to endpoints or there were issues with the application that sometimes resulted in false positives. We had a few issues with the way time zones were configured when the system time differed from the time indicated during the monitoring, but those were just little things that weren't too bad. As far as the limitations of Micro Focus SiteScope, the types of scripting files that can be executed are rather limited unless you go to some third-party plugins. These are the areas for improvement in the solution."

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."

"More out of the box Cloud integration and capabilities."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

"I have not worked with Sentry long enough to provide advice for improvements. I need more experience and time."

"To deal with its shortcomings, Sentry needs to continuously improve in areas like the user interface and documentation, apart from its other features."

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved."

"The log centralization and analysis could be improved in Sentry."

"Its debugging feature needs to be faster."

"The price could be lowered."

"Additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area of improvement."

"One area where I think Sentry can improve is in the granularity of its alerting system, as it sometimes feels too sensitive or not customizable enough."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

"When Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope has introduced approximately eight years ago and there was not very much competition making the price high. However, when comparing the price of Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope now to other tools, they should reduce the price. It is similar to a legacy tool at this point."

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

University

Computer Software Company

15%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

Regarding areas for improvement, there may be minor issues, but I have not faced any significant issues with OpenText SiteScope because I have a team that uses this product daily. As a monitoring d...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

OpenText SiteScope has a lot of use cases including monitoring websites, monitoring URLs, monitoring infrastructure resources like CPU, hard disk, and memory usage, and customized monitoring script...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Sentry is very affordable. We spend less than $200 to $300 a month. Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

Right now, Sentry meets our needs and we have not encountered any bottlenecks. However, additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Sentry?

We use Sentry for application performance management and tracking bugs and issues in the application.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

CA App Synthetic Monitor vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 5% of the time

InfoVista 5View NetFlow vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 14% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 11% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Sentry

Compared 7% of the time

SigNoz vs Sentry

Compared 6% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

March 2026

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

March 2026

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

No data available

Overview

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sentry is a robust error management system known for real-time error tracking and integration with tools like Slack, GitLab, and Jira, benefiting those seeking comprehensive application performance insights.

Sentry offers a seamless platform to monitor errors in both front-end and back-end applications, providing real-time alerts and comprehensive event log context. With its integration capabilities, teams effectively track application metrics and access performance data without direct production access, ensuring enhanced reliability. Sentry's features such as event grouping and code trace logs linked to Git repositories highlight its utility in maintaining application efficiency. Enhanced security and regular updates make it a preferred choice over competitors. Despite some requests for improvements in automation and UI enhancements, Sentry remains invaluable for error management and application performance monitoring.

What are the key features of Sentry?

Integration capabilities: Connects with Slack, GitLab, Jira, AWS Lambda.
Real-time error tracking: Alerts users instantly about errors.
Event grouping: Groups related errors for easier management.
Code trace logs: Provides detailed trace logs linked to Git repositories.
Comprehensive context: Offers a complete view of events and context.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Sentry?

Enhanced reliability: Provides critical insights for robust application performance.
Accessibility: Easy deployment and quick adaptation make it user-friendly.
Security: Maintains high security standards with timely updates.
Utility in error management: Detects silent failures, aiding ETL processes.
Cost efficiency: Favored over alternatives like New Relic due to comprehensive features.

In industries like technology, Sentry is crucial for monitoring errors in web applications, offering real-time alerts and performance tracking. It is frequently used in ETL processes to detect failures without direct developer access, benefiting teams who manage large-scale applications and databases efficiently.

Sentry

Sample Customers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

March 2026

Free Report: OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.