OpenText SiteScope vs Sentry comparison

OpenText and Sentry are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.8, while Sentry is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in APM, compared to Sentry’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Sentry users who would recommend it.

OpenText SiteScope

Read 28 OpenText SiteScope reviews

1,554 Views
1,336 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Sentry

Read 13 Sentry reviews

9,681 Views
9,391 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText SiteScope

Sentry

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText SiteScope and Sentry are both robust monitoring solutions focused on different needs. OpenText SiteScope has the upper hand in comprehensive monitoring capabilities, while Sentry stands out for its agile error tracking and ease of use.

What features are offered by OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope provides wide monitoring capabilities, covering infrastructure, applications, and services. Sentry offers exceptional error tracking, seamless integration capabilities, and intuitive use.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope requires enhancements in interface simplicity, reporting capabilities, and customization options. Sentry needs improved performance monitoring features, enhanced alerting mechanisms, and more robust error tracking.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope’s deployment can be complex due to its extensive configurations, with users noting responsive customer service but a steep learning curve. Sentry’s deployment is straightforward with supportive customer service, ensuring a smoother onboarding experience.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText SiteScope in comparison to Sentry?

OpenText SiteScope represents a higher initial investment, justified by its extensive capabilities, offering substantial long-term ROI. Sentry is a more cost-effective solution, particularly beneficial for smaller teams, providing quick returns with its efficient error monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText SiteScope

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Sentry

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Debugging (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText SiteScope is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sentry is 6.8%, up from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Gyanesh Rahatekar

Back office at Reliance Industries Ltd

Achieve seamless incident response with valuable monitoring capabilities and reliable alerts

There are multiple features related to OpenText SiteScope monitoring that I have found to be very useful, such as SSL monitoring. If SSL is present as a file in a server, then OpenText SiteScope is a very effective tool to monitor when that certificate expires. It provides comprehensive information related to SSL certificates and log monitoring. If any kind of required keyword monitoring is present in the log file, OpenText SiteScope has excellent functionality for monitoring. It is very easy to configure and obtain the correct information related to end-user requirements. The agentless monitoring feature of OpenText SiteScope is particularly impressive and easy to configure and gather information from. According to the operations team perspective, there is no impact related to resource management from the agentless monitoring. It demonstrates very low resource consumption related to its functionality.

Read full review

Abdullah Baig

Software Dev at AF AB

An easy-to-use solution that has a good dashboard, performs well, and provides flexible pricing

Sentry was easy to learn compared to New Relic and Azure Monitor. I saw some valuable input. It took us the least amount of time to see how Sentry is valuable. It took just a few minutes. Session Replay provides a replay of the recorded errors. It is a good feature. Azure Monitor does not have this feature. The error reporting is straightforward. We can see everything that we need to see. The dashboard seems pretty fine. The product performs well. We can see the user's IP addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Being able to create your monitors for monitoring your internal URLs and databases and other things like that is valuable."

"Instead of executing jobs multiple times, I can configure it once, schedule, and apply it on multiple servers in sequence. It allows me to create scripts and automate several processes, making tasks simpler and more efficient."

"Simplest tool for monitoring servers, web content, databases and other hardware. Its dashboard is really good."

"It's a very flexible product so you can run a script out of it, even straight out of the box."

"I find OpenText SiteScope itself to be uncomplicated and deserving of a ten out of ten due to its simplicity."

"It's easy to template standard monitoring configurations, and automate monitoring configuration."

"It's integrated with different monitoring tools, such as AppDynamics."

"Simple deployment: The deployment uses protocols such as NetBios, SSH, WMI, SNMP, which means that any device with any of these protocols will be monitored."

More OpenText SiteScope pros

"Sentry breaks everything down in real time."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The implementation is easy. After one or two days, I can learn and use it. It's not too hard."

"The stability is very good for Sentry and in general works well."

"Sentry is more accurate than some other tools such as Datadog because it has more integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira, or other ticketing tools."

"Overall, I give Sentry a rating of 10."

"The most valuable feature we have found with Sentry is the security that it provides."

"The product performs well."

More Sentry pros

Cons

"While working with OpenText, I noticed sometimes teams refuse intervention due to compliance issues."

"Direct integration with an SMS gateway for sending critical alerts to the support SME. This will help customer investing in third party middleware solutions for SMS."

"SiteScope isn't productive if you want to monitor RAM or if you want to monitor some URL."

"It may lack some features other products in the category have like more detailed transaction tracking."

"It should improve its integrations with various tools, especially service management tools."

"They have not kept up with browser security requirements or advances in GUIs, they switched to a corruptible database architecture instead of text config files."

"The interface of OpenText SiteScope needs improvement. It has a Java-based interface, which is slow and could be simplified for better usability."

"We have four or five data centers around North America where we have it deployed into a single or a two-server primary backup type of deployment. All those are made available under a single GUI provided by Micro Focus that allows you to put them all together. A room for improvement would be an appliance or a server that would manage all of our other servers so that I don't have to remember to log on to all different servers and data centers. I could manage them from a single location."

More OpenText SiteScope cons

"I would like to have alert policies and alert conditions enhanced in the next release."

"Lacks user metric tracking and the ability to create more dashboards."

"We cannot restrict particular columns on particular data. It would be helpful if that feature was improved."

"I have not worked with Sentry long enough to provide advice for improvements. I need more experience and time."

"It should be easier to integrate Sentry with other tools, and the end-to-end tracing capabilities could be improved."

"It would be nice if the product provided a map showing the users’ geographic location."

"The settings for an administrator are complex."

"I would like to see a role registration feature added."

More Sentry cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing should be lower since there are many open-source products that can do the same job with better user interfaces. The tool's pricing is yearly and you need to pay for support."

"I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten on a scale where one is cheap and ten is expensive."

"You have to pay for their "solution templates". Other tools do not charge you for knowledge-based monitoring bundles."

"Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model."

"The pricing or licensing cost for Micro Focus SiteScope is often bundled with other things, so the cost for each individual would be difficult to calculate. Pricing could be $2,000,000 a year. My company pays for technical support because it's part of the contract with Micro Focus SiteScope. You buy the licenses, but you're also paying for the support. With Nagios, it's much more bare-bones as far as paying for licenses and the software itself, and my company didn't have to use as much Nagios support yet in one or two years because there weren't too many problems using Nagios, and it's much more cost-effective, so that's one of the reasons why my company is migrating to Nagios from Micro Focus SiteScope."

"Licensing is a little steep."

"SiteScope licensing can be node based-or monitor-based. I would recommend for node-based licensing."

"It is expensive. I don't like its licensing. I don't like anything where you have to license it by individual licenses. I'm not a fan of that, but that's just me."

More OpenText SiteScope pricing and cost advice

"We can adjust the price a little bit based on our needs."

"Currently, we are in the production phase of our project and we are on free plans to use Sentry. Once we go live we will have to be on a subscription-based plan."

"We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service."

"I am currently using a self-hosted open version."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

University

Computer Software Company

17%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The most valuable feature of SiteScope is its infrastructure monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The licensing scheme for Micro Focus tools is reasonable, and more affordable. It's seen as medium or de-receivable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Voltage SiteScope?

The new version D2 has improved with a smart plan UI interface. However, while still using the classic WebTop UI, it looks outdated and not HTML5 compatible. They are currently in progress to migra...

See all answers

What do you like most about Sentry?

The product performs well.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Sentry?

Sentry is very affordable. We spend less than $200 to $300 a month. Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Sentry?

Right now, Sentry meets our needs and we have not encountered any bottlenecks. However, additional personalization and easier setup for capturing all the different application logs could be an area...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 11% of the time

OmniPeek vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

Grafana vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 8% of the time

AWS Auto Scaling vs OpenText SiteScope

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText SiteScope Competitors

Grafana vs Sentry

Compared 19% of the time

Azure Monitor vs Sentry

Compared 12% of the time

OpenTelemetry vs Sentry

Compared 11% of the time

Elastic Observability vs Sentry

Compared 9% of the time

AWS X-Ray vs Sentry

Compared 8% of the time

More Sentry Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope

August 2025

Download OpenText SiteScope product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

August 2025

Download Sentry product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus SiteScope, HPE SiteScope, SiteScope

No data available

Overview

OpenText SiteScope is an agentless monitoring program that tracks the availability and performance of distributed IT infrastructures such as servers, network devices and services, applications and application components, virtualization software, operating systems, and other IT enterprise components.

OpenText SiteScope is an autonomous hybrid IT monitoring system that can monitor more than 100 different types of IT components in real time, thanks to a lightweight and highly customizable remote access architecture.

With OpenText SiteScope, IT teams can get the data they need to keep on top of problems and eliminate bottlenecks before they become major concerns.

OpenText SiteScope can reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) by utilizing agentless technology, which eliminates the need to install and monitor agents on each box. Manual activities can be automated, and teams can save time and effort by using pre-packaged solution templates.

OpenText SiteScope Features

OpenText SiteScope has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Broad functionality built on expertise: OpenText SiteScope's architecture is scalable and supports a broad range of functions, including data collecting, alerting, event management, and reporting. Data is collected via remote access, which eliminates the need for agents to be deployed and maintained on monitored nodes. OpenText SiteScope connects to systems as a remote user via the central server, which supports JMX, SNMP, HTTP, SSH, NetBIOS, and WMI.

Monitors legacy and modern environments: OpenText SiteScope comes with more than 100 built-in monitors that track things like utilization, response time, use, and resource availability.
- Cloud: You can monitor virtual servers and applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS). AWS-hosted applications can provide data to Amazon CloudWatch, which can be used for auto-scaling, reporting, and alerting.
- Virtualization: OpenText SiteScope supports VMware, Microsoft, Citrix, and Oracle/Sun virtualization technologies. Monitor Docker clusters, nodes, containers, and workloads.

Flexibility with configuration: By adding or deleting specific monitors, you can adapt to dynamic changes in data center configuration.

Templates for solutions: The template database is based on best practices for monitoring complex application settings with the least amount of time and effort. The templates include built-in domain experience of specialized monitors, default metrics and thresholds, proactive testing, and best practices for a given application or monitoring component.

Notifications, alerts, and reports: Email, SNMP traps, HTTP post, and database alerts are all supported. Administrators receive alerts based on defined thresholds and schedules.

Flexibility in user management: Using LDAP or an internal management solution, define group-level permissions, construct user roles, and assign security groups depending on role. Extensive WS (Web Service)-based API that automates numerous management situations without the need for the SiteScope UI.

Integrations with SiteScope: OpenText SiteScope not only offers a number of benefits on its own, but it can also be linked with a number of OpenText and third-party solutions, giving teams the ability to properly integrate their IT operations center.

OpenText

Sentry is a tool for monitoring web and application performance, tracking errors, processing request times, and managing user data access.

Developers integrate Sentry with web and application environments to capture front-end and back-end errors, utilize error logs, trace requests, and observe metrics without real-time production access. Sentry's use extends to monitoring internal applications, leveraging CyberArk PAM integration, deploying notifications, and detecting silent failures. Users benefit from detailed error and performance reports, contextual cause-stack information, and real-time breakdowns. There is room for improvement, as users desire refined integration and administrative settings, enhanced alert policies, and more customization in event metrics.

What are Sentry's most important features?

Integration with Slack, GitLab, Jira for smoother workflow
Detailed error and performance reports for clearer insights
AWS Lambda compatibility for cloud functions
Contextual cause-stack information helps pinpoint issues
Real-time breakdowns for immediate data
Session Replay for reviewing user sessions

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating Sentry?

Efficient error tracking and monitoring improves application stability
Integration with major tools enhances team collaboration
User-friendly interfaces deliver a smooth learning curve
Security features provide peace of mind
ETL pipeline orchestration streamlines data handling

Sentry is implemented across industries ranging from tech startups to large enterprises. These organizations use Sentry to enhance application reliability, track performance, and secure user data within protected environments. Integration with CyberArk PAM ensures secure deployment. Organizations find Sentry useful for monitoring internal applications, efficiently processing request times, and tracing changes in production without direct access.

Sentry

Sample Customers

Vodafone Ireland, Kuveyt Turk Participation Bank

Dropbox, Airbnb, Stripe, Uber

Buyer's Guide

OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText SiteScope vs. Sentry report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.