OpenText Real User Monitoring vs Workspace ONE Intelligence comparison

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence

Download the complete report

Helped 850,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

45th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Workspace ONE Intelligence

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile APM (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Workspace ONE Intelligence is 0.1%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive

Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.

Read full review

Muhammad JunaidJawed

Sr. VDI Engineer at Afiniti.com

Helps to find devices that are lost but improvement is needed in mapping

The tool's deployment is easy. There are lots of documents and support available online. I help deploy Workspace ONE Intelligence. It's not hard to deploy since we've done it many times. We use the on-premises solution now. Basic deployment takes one day, but adding features like tunneling takes an extra day. The main challenge is network connectivity. The documentation is good and available online.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure."

"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."

"The technical support is good at resolving issues."

"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."

"Very easy to implement."

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"It is a good product."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

"Integration is also very easy."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its tunneling capability. It is good for inventory, encryption, device location, and kiosk mode. If a device is lost, you can find it. We integrated it with a third-party tool for one-time passwords and two-factor authentication. The user-friendly interface makes device management easy."

Cons

"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

"When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported."

"Some issues with login errors."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."

"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

"Windows devices management needs improvement."

"One area for improvement is location mapping - it uses Bing Maps instead of Google Maps, which isn't always up to date. Device enrollment can also be challenging, especially for older devices that need a factory reset."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"Not expensive."

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The solution is cost-effective. Workspace ONE Intelligence is neither cheap nor expensive. Compared to other tools like MaaS360, it Is more cost-effective. It costs about seven dollars per user, while others might cost $50—a big difference."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Government

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Compared to the market, the pricing is cheap.

What needs improvement with Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Challenges are so many challenges out there. Windows devices installment in Workspace ONE Intelligence and Windows devices management needs improvement. I don't see any new AI features, and I would...

What advice do you have for others considering Workspace ONE Intelligence?

Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Comparisons

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs Workspace ONE Intelligence

Compared 100% of the time

More Workspace ONE Intelligence Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Download Workspace ONE Intelligence product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

Apteligent, Crittercism

Overview

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

OpenText

Get insights, guidelines, and preferred outcomes that will help you deliver the best possible mobile experience for your customers and help make your mobile business successful like never before.

When milliseconds can cost you millions, Apteligent reveals operational and usage trends, uncovers issues, and analyzes behaviors. This allows you to continuously improve apps, keep users happy, and put your mobile business at the top of its game.

Omnissa

Sample Customers

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

AT&T, Bloomberg, CNN, Experian, Fox, JC Penny, Urban Outfitters, Nokia, Lutron, NASCAR, T-Mobile, Urban Engines, Microsoft, Lego

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Workspace ONE Intelligence