Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs OpenText Operations Bridge comparison

OpenText and Broadcom are both solutions in the Event Monitoring category. OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3, while Broadcom is ranked #13. OpenText holds a 6.2% mindshare in EM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.
OpenText Operations Bridge
Read 48 OpenText Operations Bridge reviews
  • 706 Views
  • 350 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...
Read 27 OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reviews
  • 205 Views
  • 125 Comparison Views
96% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

OpenText Operations Bridge and OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence are competing products in IT operations management and automation. Data comparisons indicate that OpenText Operations Bridge is preferred for its cost-effectiveness and customer support, while OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is recognized for its robust features, making it valuable for certain businesses despite its higher cost.

Features: OpenText Operations Bridge provides comprehensive monitoring, IT performance analytics, and automated incident responses. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence offers advanced automation capabilities, runs efficiently in complex environments, and supports system-wide synchronization and control utilizing tools like System State Manager and OPSLOG.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Operations Bridge could enhance integration with third-party tools, optimize its UI for easier navigation, and simplify its complex setup and maintenance processes. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence may improve by incorporating user-friendly interfaces, enhancing support for non-mainframe environments, and offering more comprehensive documentation to ease the learning curve.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Operations Bridge is known for a straightforward deployment and strong customer support that facilitates quick integration into existing systems. OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, while feature-rich, involves a more complex deployment that may require technical expertise, yet it provides reliable support throughout the process.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Operations Bridge typically presents a lower initial setup cost and competitive ROI, suitable for budget-conscious enterprises. In contrast, OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence, positioned at a higher price point, offers significant ROI by leveraging extensive automation capabilities, recognizing long-term operational benefits.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText Operations Bridge Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText Operations Bridge
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Operations Bridge
Ranking in Event Monitoring
8th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
IT Operations Analytics (10th), Cloud Monitoring Software (30th)
OPS/MVS Automation Intellig...
Ranking in Event Monitoring
13th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.3
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Mainframe Management (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Event Monitoring category, the mindshare of OpenText Operations Bridge is 6.2%, up from 6.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence is 2.8%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Event Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmed Salman - PeerSpot reviewer
Powerful data integration, comprehensive automation, and hybrid compatibility
The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge. It can integrate with any BI tool to collect AI data and perform a variety of functions. It offers hybrid compatibility and supports desktop application customization and cloud integration. Another essential capability is server automation, which became significantly easier with the software appliance for deployment. This solution also provides role-based access that enhances data privacy and security.
Read full review
it_user351621 - PeerSpot reviewer
The ability to use command rules is great when our operators have repetitive tasks, but we'd like to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is.
One of the things we've been wanting to do is to be able to automate off of different highlighted messages without actually knowing what the message is. For example, we'd like to be able to create some generic automation when we receive a warning or alert message to allow, if nothing else, the automation team to know so we can contact the product owner. If there's something we can do to automate or expedite notification to the proper people, we want to try to do that.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The Performance Manager provides great insight into our systems' performance."
"It is stable."
"I've found the solution to be very scalable."
"Purely, its flexibility is the most valuable aspect. It is hugely configurable."
"The correlation feature is the most used feature. It allows you to correlate events from different sources and have more meaningful events."
"The data lake is a very powerful feature within OpenText Operations Bridge."
"I rate OpenText Operations Bridge as a solid nine on a scale of one to ten."
"The initial setup is pretty straightforward. It's not complex at all."
More OpenText Operations Bridge pros
"With the automation pieces we can bring this region up or take this region down, and it allows us to always meet our time critical requirements."
"The performance of it is beyond exceptional. It is probably one of the best products that I have ever worked with. It is easy to use, comprehensive, and can perform almost any task you need it to."
"It's very flexible. You can customize what you need to, which is good. For example, you can do your own coding inside the tool, make your own scripting tooling."
"It alerts the operators when it is time to repair the communications and the IPLs."
"It's a very stable product. I very much like the SSM stuff in it. The rules engine, it's awesome."
"Once automatic IPL has been defined, anyone can perform an IPL with very little intervention. We know that all of the components will be started correctly."
"The documentation is simple, easy to follow, and use. A limited, first-time systems programmer can do it, in that it is out-of-the-box almost functional."
"Because we can define complex commands, the training of new operators is quicker. We can also put checks in place, that will prevent user errors."
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence pros
 

Cons

"The price is quite expensive, and because of this, we may try another solution."
"Implementation could be improved."
"What needs improvement in Micro Focus Operations Bridge is its resource heaviness because you need many resources to deploy and support it. It's a good solution for larger organizations, but for small businesses, not so much."
"Installing and upgrading the HPOM and Operations Agent software is not always easy and the process can be quite fragile. Once it is running, it is very quick and stable, but an upgrade can quite easily break something or terminate unexpectedly."
"The deployment of agents on new CI should be improved. There should be some kind of automation to directly deploy them from the console. It can maybe have some more AI functions because most of the other tools are going in that direction."
"In a future release, we would like an improved upgrade process. When you upgrade it now, it first uninstalls everything and then reinstalls all the packages, which means any customization that you've done in the directories on the surface disappears."
"It is a very complicated product. It's difficult to manage. Nowadays, products are very easy to manage, deploy, and integrate, but Operations Bridge is very complicated to manage."
"Remove the dependency of Java technology. This is a feature used for admin purposes to update the modeling."
More OpenText Operations Bridge cons
"Because of its age, it's a little bit difficult to modernize some of the integrations and some of the functions."
"Scalability is zero. It cannot be scaled because of its age."
"The interfaces to USS, CA UIM could be better. CA Common Services interfaces - namely Zdata Mover, Zmessage Service, Zdatacolletcor - are poorly documented."
"Some of the command sequences are too long."
"The further expansion of the mainframe teamcenter interface. Also, the web services support is something that I am looking into."
"The reason sometimes it is not stable, we do not have the expertise to write the script.​"
"It definitely needs more web-based interface, to be more mobile-open. More APIs, more open source to it."
"The GUI interface could be improved, but that is coming. They are working on that."
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing model for Micro Focus Operations Bridge is unit-based so it can be one device or ten devices depending on your situation or model. Cost-wise, it's much more if you have more devices and features such as infrastructure monitoring, analytic dashboard, and business dashboard in your model."
"It is competitive."
"Pricing is very flexible and depends on the modules selected as per the requirement."
"The cost is very high."
"The licensing cost for this solution is approximately $1,000 USD."
"As OpsBridge is a suite of products bundled together, you may find yourself paying for software functionality that you don't actually use, e.g. Real User Monitor (RUM)."
"Setup costs can be high depending on the partner, but it is worth it."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Event Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Government
7%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Logistics Company
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Insurance Company
12%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
From a cost perspective, OpenText Operations Bridge is cost-effective as it saves us man hours. What used to be done manually by a person is now done automatically. With its automation capabilities...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
The only aspect I find lacking in OpenText Operations Bridge is more aesthetic. The dashboards from OpenText Operations Bridge, when compared to those from Splunk, are less visually appealing. Splu...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Operations Bridge?
We use OpenText Operations Bridge ( /products/opentext-operations-bridge-reviews ) more from an event correlation perspective. We do not use it for pure monitoring since we have other monitoring to...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

OpsRamp vs OpenText Operations Bridge Logo
OpsRamp vs OpenText Operations Bridge
Compared 36% of the time
SCOM vs OpenText Operations Bridge Logo
SCOM vs OpenText Operations Bridge
Compared 29% of the time
BMC Helix Monitor vs OpenText Operations Bridge Logo
BMC Helix Monitor vs OpenText Operations Bridge
Compared 21% of the time
Zabbix vs OpenText Operations Bridge Logo
Zabbix vs OpenText Operations Bridge
Compared 14% of the time
More OpenText Operations Bridge Competitors
CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Logo
CA Automation Point vs OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
Compared 100% of the time
More OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Operations Bridge
April 2025
OpenText Operations Bridge reportDownload OpenText Operations Bridge product report
Buyer's Guide
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence
April 2025
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence reportDownload OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Operations Bridge, Operations Bridge Manager, Micro Focus Operations Analytics
CA OPS MVS Event Management and Automation, CA OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation, Unicenter CA-OPS/MVS Event Management and Automation
 

Overview

OpenText Operations Bridge – SaaS is enterprise event and performance management software. With automated discovery, monitoring, and remediation, it fast-tracks your move to full-stack AIOps across multicloud and on- premises environments.
OpenText
z/OS, its subsystems, databases, middleware, applications, and software generate thousands of event messages daily. IT professionals need a tool to filter, prioritize, and respond quickly to these events before they impact availability and threaten business processing and associated service level agreements. CA OPS/MVS EMA automates processes, enabling you to resolve problems as they arise. It also automates more routine tasks, simplifying IT management and operations.
Broadcom
 

Sample Customers

GE Money Bank, Bank AlJazira, Tech Mahindra
Tieto
Buyer's Guide
OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText Operations Bridge
April 2025
Free Report: OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText Operations Bridge
Find out what your peers are saying about OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText Operations Bridge and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our OPS/MVS Automation Intelligence vs. OpenText Operations Bridge report.
See our list of best Event Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Event Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.