We performed a comparison between OpenText Network Operations Management and PRTG Network Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can detect non-compliant devices and automate remediation actions to cover the gap in the configuration standards."
"When it comes to customization, Micro Focus is more mature than its competitors."
"The up-to-date graphs and the history are very good."
"The product is simple and easy to implement."
"The installation is not that complex."
"It is a user-friendly solution."
"Nice product with an easy interface to use and a large variety of sensors."
"My opinion is that this solution is not very expensive."
"It is easy when it comes to dependencies of devices, so if your router goes down, the three or four switches behind it will automatically be paused so that you don't get multiple alerts."
"The solution provides us response times to issues."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"It may need a more customizable UI."
"Micro Focus Network Management doesn't support end-to-end monitoring of cloud infrastructure. Micro Focus might have different cloud solutions for cloud automation and hybrid cloud management. There are a lot of products that also support automation. That is different, but it should monitor the cloud from an IT operations management perspective."
"I would like to see more updates available in this solution."
"PRTG would be improved if it required less memory to run."
"Maybe in the future there will be room for improvement, but currently, there is nothing pressing that I can think of"
"PRTG Network Monitor is okay to use, but you'll need some time to analyze the data. If it can automatically locate or identify the problem area, it would be more helpful to users."
"Performance-wise, PRTG Network Monitor still needs improvement because a large number of SNMPv3 queries reduces tool performance."
"This solution is a good product so far, but I haven't been using it long enough to know how it could be improved."
"We're using more cloud services now. It would be useful to be able to get information back from these cloud services in detail, and display any issues within PRTG for the rest of our systems."
"Can be slow in the way it polls the different engines."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More OpenText Network Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Network Operations Management is ranked 45th in Network Monitoring Software with 2 reviews while PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 5th in Network Monitoring Software with 96 reviews. OpenText Network Operations Management is rated 9.0, while PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText Network Operations Management writes "Good integration capabilities, good reliability, and is user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". OpenText Network Operations Management is most compared with , whereas PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Zabbix, Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM and ManageEngine OpManager. See our OpenText Network Operations Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.