No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

OpenText Migrate​ vs SnapLogic comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Migrate​
Ranking in Migration Tools
2nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (6th)
SnapLogic
Ranking in Migration Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Customer Data Integration (4th), Data Integration (5th), Business-to-Business Middleware (6th), Process Automation (4th), API Management (8th), Cloud Data Integration (3rd), Data Preparation Tools (6th), AI Development Platforms (15th), Data Migration Appliances (4th), Low-Code Development Platforms (15th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (1st), AI Governance (5th), AI Orchestration Frameworks (4th), Agentic Automation (8th), AI Agent Builders (11th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Migration Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Migrate​ is 8.6%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SnapLogic is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Migration Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
OpenText Migrate​8.6%
SnapLogic0.5%
Other90.9%
Migration Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ludovik DOPIERALA - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager, Service Line at ARTEMYS INVEST
Migration projects have become faster and have saved significant time on complex workloads
OpenText Migrate is our primary tool. I know they have a lot of other products like DNS and tools from cybersecurity, but we don't use it at this time. On Demand Recovery, for recovery, we use another tool from OpenText. It's C2C. It's a product to back up the mailbox. I don't know what I can find at this time. So maybe yes, but the last time I used it was a few months ago. It does the job, so I don't have an opinion on this currently. They don't have a lot of marketing actions. We know this product because we are an OpenText partner for the C2C. But it's another division. It's another part of the company. So we don't have a lot of information. So, I think they can improve the communication for the end-user because a lot of customers do not know OpenText, and they don't know they can provide this type of tool. My overall rating for this product is 9.
AR
Integration Consultant at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
Low-code integrations have automated workflows and save time across enterprise applications
They can enhance the error handling and debugging part. Troubleshooting complex pipeline failures can be time-consuming. We are spending a lot of time on error handling. More detailed error messages and root cause analysis tools can be added, which will definitely improve the developer experience. In the Ultra real-time integrations, we can monitor the last execution history of only 100 runs. That can be increased, which would be one of the platform improvements that can really be taken. However, they are doing very well because lots of ChatGPTs and AI assistants have been added in the last two years, which makes a very good effect. SnapLogic is the only platform that provides this kind of visibility to the developers. Anyone, even if they have low experience and are starting their IT careers, can directly jump in and learn SnapLogic. The documentation is very easy to learn. Anyone, even a layman, can refer to that documentation and go through its Snap-pack to understand what configuration has to be done to use this Snap-pack. This makes SnapLogic definitely exceptional in the market. You won't find such comprehensive documentation in other iPaaS tools. The draggable packs truly demonstrate its power in usability. Governance and security are also well in place in SnapLogic, but there are areas for improvement. They can add more granular role and permission controls that provide greater flexibility for large enterprises. For example, if you have to provide access to 70 users in one shot, that can be improved. More improvements in policy enforcement capabilities are possible as well. SnapLogic can improve the data lineage part to achieve better end-to-end visibility into data movement. Also, during validation, we can only see up to 2,000 records currently. They can increase that from 2,000 to 20,000. They can put more visibility on costs and resource visibility, with better reporting on platform usage, processing consumption, and cost optimization opportunities.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"OpenText Migrate is a very good product because it is an older product and they have a lot of tools, and they have a lot of experience on the migration tools."
"Carbonite Migrate works well in Windows platform migrations and in the case of a VML platform. The migration is smooth in Windows environments."
"It is a good third-party migration tool because it can be used with clients who have heterogeneous environments."
"The solution is user-friendly."
"Carbonite Migrate is helpful on an infrastructure level."
"The solutions ability to connect "snaps" or components to the graphic user interface is very intuitive, prevents errors, and makes implementations easy."
"Despite having no prior experience in SnapLogic, we managed to build, test, and prepare it for release in just three hours, handling heavy data efficiently."
"Everything is very good; it's good for mapping for the company, we have a lot of use cases that we can apply to this solution, and they are very good at building out new aspects according to customer requirements."
"SnapLogic has positively impacted my organization because we have been able to cut down manual import into the CRM by over 50%, which means that the data quality is improving over time."
"We don't get failures, we don't get issues, and we don't get week on week issues with the processes; it just works."
"SnapLogic has positively impacted our organization by allowing us to remove a big risk and cost in removing a legacy integration platform, and we have built the foundations to gain significant efficiencies in our integrations."
"After migrating from Informatica to SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform (IIP), we have seen specific outcomes, including saving almost 2 million dollars from one of our migration projects."
"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."
 

Cons

"The pricing for the customer is always too expensive."
"We find it very difficult to use these tools in a multi-cloud environment"
"If we had to move 100 applications across a multi-cloud environment, then this solution would not work."
"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved. During RHEL migration with multiple data areas, you have to create a similar source environment at the destination. This can be challenging because you have to install it, create the VM, install over it, and mount it at the mount point. Only then can you do the migration."
"Carbonite failed when moving GIS data."
"Migration in RHEL and Linux environments can be improved."
"Regarding improvements for SnapLogic, I observe that networking and security technology continue to evolve, but SnapLogic lacks the transit gateway feature."
"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."
"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."
"Areas for improvement for SnapLogic include enhancing the documentation, especially by providing more complex examples in each Snappack, to cover various use cases that different team members may encounter."
"The solution isn't ideal for complex processing or logic. We use another solution for that."
"Regarding SnapLogic's AI capabilities, I believe its governance and security are good, but the actual pipeline design is not production-ready."
"Every tool has some advantages and there are some other things that need improvement."
"While new features are always welcome, I do not have anything else at the top of my mind currently."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing costs are really high."
"In terms of pricing, I think it's an expensive tool."
"They have pricing/usage tiers that are easy to move up or down."
"SnapLogic is not expensive. It's reasonably priced."
"When comparing it with solutions like Apigee or MuleSoft, it still offers better value."
"SnapLogic's price is high compared to the other tools available in the market."
"From the ROI perspective, the price is extremely high"
"The license model is based on consumption."
"I used the free trial."
"By scaling the solution incrementally the cost is controlled and more beneficial to the client."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Migration Tools solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
12%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Healthcare Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise18
Large Enterprise36
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Carbonite Migrate?
C2C is OpenText. It's Carbonite. It was a backup for the mailbox and Teams, OneDrive, SharePoint, or similar applications. We don't use it. The only tools that we use to encrypt data are th...
What is your primary use case for Carbonite Migrate?
I use this project because I work for an IT company in France and we perform a lot of migration work, and we often use OpenText Migrate. We perform a lot of migration of Microsoft Active Directory,...
What needs improvement with SnapLogic?
I feel SnapLogic can be improved, particularly on the user interface side. While it is good, I believe we can improve the GUI further. This improvement would help newcomers by making the interface ...
What is your primary use case for SnapLogic?
My main use case for SnapLogic is for different projects involving data migrations. We need to migrate data from our old SQL database to SnapLogic. I am mainly using it for this purpose and am curr...
What advice do you have for others considering SnapLogic?
SnapLogic is a powerful tool that is easy to use. It is more beneficial, more secure, and more stable compared to other tools I have used previously. I can recommend this to everyone. I have rated ...
 

Also Known As

No data available
DataFlow, SnapLogic Intelligent Integration Platform (IIP)
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Computrade Malaysia
Adobe, ADP, BlackBerry, Bonobos, Box, Capital One, Dannon, Eero, Endo, Gensler, HCL, HP, Grovo, HIS, iRobot, Leica, Merck, Sans, Target, Verizon, Vodafone, Yelp, Yahoo!
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Migrate​ vs. SnapLogic and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.