OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs pCloudy comparison

OpenText and pCloudy are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7, while pCloudy is ranked #13. OpenText holds a 5.6% mindshare in MTT, compared to pCloudy’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of pCloudy users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,471 Views
559 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

pCloudy

Read 2 pCloudy reviews

282 Views
282 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

pCloudy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and pCloudy are competing products within the software testing space. OpenText has an upper hand in integration with enterprise tools, while pCloudy is favored for its device support and efficiency.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web provides extensive integration capabilities, detailed reporting features, and comprehensive test coverage, enhancing traceability. pCloudy offers a cloud-based infrastructure, supports a wide range of devices, and enables quick test execution, helping teams maintain continuous testing.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText provides a deployment model integrating well into existing enterprise structures with responsive technical assistance. pCloudy has a straightforward deployment process and excellent support, ideal for fast-paced environments needing rapid, scalable solutions.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing Lab's setup cost is justified by its robust testing capabilities, promising high long-term ROI. pCloudy offers competitive pricing with attractive returns through cost-effective testing solutions, focused on speed and scalability. pCloudy’s affordability aligns with both small-scale and fast-growing organizations seeking immediate ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

pCloudy

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 5.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of pCloudy is 2.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	5.6%
pCloudy	2.4%
Other	92.0%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Rabindra Maharana

Business Consultant at Tech Mahindra Limited

Helps applications to be compatible with other devices

The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"The solution provides a controlled device farm with the right devices (selected based on analytics), that are readily available (can be reserved), have the right app and can be used for manual or automated tests."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The product is easy to use."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The product is also very good on the UI level where they can see the logs and discover any problem at the app level, so that the development team can fix that."

"The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs."

"The product is very good on the UI level."

Cons

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need."

"The connectivity is always a challenge. We have to maintain a certain bandwidth at our end to connect the tool and that can be a problem."

"The connectivity is always a challenge for us."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a six-point five out of ten. It is neither too low nor high. The product has different packages like gold, silver, and platinum. The number of users is determined on the basis of the package. My company has subscribed for the product's annual plan."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Non Profit

Construction Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Perfecto vs pCloudy

Compared 36% of the time

HeadSpin vs pCloudy

Compared 22% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs pCloudy

Compared 21% of the time

AWS Device Farm vs pCloudy

Compared 21% of the time

More pCloudy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

March 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2026

Download pCloudy product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

pCloudy is the next-gen mobile app testing platform powered by emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics. You can perform manual as well as automation testing on more than 5000 device-browser combination hosted on cloud. It provides hosts of other services like bot testing, in-field user experience testing.

pCloudy

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Philips, Capgemini, Honeywell, Jio, Northwell Health, Swiggy

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy

March 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.