OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs pCloudy comparison

OpenText and pCloudy are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.7, while pCloudy is ranked #12. OpenText holds a 5.6% mindshare in MTT, compared to pCloudy’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of pCloudy users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

1,143 Views
514 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

pCloudy

Read 2 pCloudy reviews

282 Views
282 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

pCloudy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web and pCloudy are competing in the mobile and web testing solutions category. OpenText has the edge in customer satisfaction for pricing and support, while pCloudy leads with feature richness.

Features: OpenText provides robust testing tools, a focus on integration capabilities, and suitability for complex environments. pCloudy has AI-driven testing, wide real device coverage, and advanced functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers straightforward deployment with solid technical support and seamless integration. pCloudy is notable for cloud-based deployment, quick setup, scalability, and commendable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText involves higher upfront costs due to its toolset and support, offering long-term savings for complex needs. pCloudy presents competitive pricing with flexible plans for faster ROI and cost-effective scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

pCloudy

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 5.6%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of pCloudy is 1.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	5.6%
pCloudy	1.8%
Other	92.6%

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Rabindra Maharana

Business Consultant at Tech Mahindra Limited

Helps applications to be compatible with other devices

The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The ease of use and being able to enroll more people into developing test scripts using their AI function, which they call AI but is OCR recognition, is significant."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs."

"The product is very good on the UI level."

Cons

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"The connectivity is always a challenge for us."

"The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a six-point five out of ten. It is neither too low nor high. The product has different packages like gold, silver, and platinum. The number of users is determined on the basis of the package. My company has subscribed for the product's annual plan."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Non Profit

10%

Performing Arts

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 13% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Appium vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

HeadSpin vs pCloudy

Compared 100% of the time

More pCloudy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

January 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

January 2026

Download pCloudy product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

pCloudy is the next-gen mobile app testing platform powered by emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics. You can perform manual as well as automation testing on more than 5000 device-browser combination hosted on cloud. It provides hosts of other services like bot testing, in-field user experience testing.

pCloudy

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Philips, Capgemini, Honeywell, Jio, Northwell Health, Swiggy

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. pCloudy report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.