Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

The compared OpenText and Parasoft solutions aren't in the same category. OpenText is ranked #2 in DAST , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 17.9% mindshare in the category. Parasoft is ranked #18 in FT , with an average rating of 9.0, and holds a 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.
OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Read 22 OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reviews
  • 3,330 Views
  • 866 Comparison Views
83% willing to recommend
Parasoft SOAtest
Read 32 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
  • 1,955 Views
  • 489 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing and Parasoft SOAtest based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about HCLSoftware , OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 867,349 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Dynamic Applicatio...
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (2nd), DevSecOps (8th)
Parasoft SOAtest
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
32
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), Functional Testing Tools (18th), API Testing Tools (9th), Test Automation Tools (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 17.9%, down 22.0% compared to last year.
Parasoft SOAtest, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 0.9% mindshare, up 0.7% since last year.
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing17.9%
HCL AppScan14.3%
Checkmarx One13.5%
Other54.3%
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Parasoft SOAtest0.9%
Tricentis Tosca18.5%
BrowserStack10.2%
Other70.4%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Navin N - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective scanning of diverse file extensions with fast reporting and issue resolution
We develop software packages for clients, and these clients are mostly in the BFSI sector. The packages need to be scanned, and we engage Fortify WebInspect for this.  Customers typically perform their own application pen tests, but in some cases, we have engagements where customers want us to scan…
Read full review
Nghiêm Phương - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality and security improvements drive user satisfaction
We have many customers, but with Parasoft SOAtest, we just focus on .NET, Java, and PHP protocols and message formats. For deployment, it runs on-premise with Parasoft SOAtest. The transition from manual testing can be challenging, and it's the first time they're using automation testing with Parasoft SOAtest. For the tool itself, Parasoft SOAtest, I would rate it as great with an overall rating of 10 out of 10.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to use."
"The transaction recorder within WebInspect is easy to use, which is valuable for our team."
"When we are integrating it with SSC, we're able to scan and trace and see all of the vulnerabilities. Comparison is easy in SSC."
"The feature that has been most influential in identifying vulnerabilities is its ability to crawl the website, understand the structure, and analyze the network packets sent and received."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to make our customers more secure."
"The accuracy of its scans is great."
"Good at scanning and finding vulnerabilities."
"There are lots of small settings and tools, like an HTTP editor, that are very useful."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing pros
"The solution is scalable."
"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."
"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."
"Generating new messages, based on the existing .EDN and .XML messages, is a crucial part or the testing project that I’m currently in."
"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."
"We have seen a return on investment."
"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."
"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."
More Parasoft SOAtest pros
 

Cons

"Lately, we've seen more false negatives."
"The initial setup was complex."
"Fortify WebInspect's shortcoming stems from the fact that it is a very expensive product in Korea, which makes it difficult for its potential customers to introduce the product in their IT environment."
"Not sufficiently compatible with some of our systems."
"A localized version, for example, in Korean would be a big improvement to this solution."
"The main area for improvement in Fortify WebInspect is the price, as it is too high compared to the market rate."
"Fortify WebInspect could improve user-friendliness. Additionally, it is very bulky to use."
"It took us between eight and ten hours to scan an entire site, which is somewhat slow and something that I think can be improved."
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing cons
"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."
"The performance could be a bit better."
"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."
"In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices."
"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."
"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."
"UI testing should be more in-depth."
"Reporting facilities can be better."
More Parasoft SOAtest cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It’s a fair price for the solution."
"The price is okay."
"The pricing is not clear and while it is not high, it is difficult to understand."
"Our licensing is such that you can only run one scan at a time, which is inconvenient."
"This solution is very expensive."
"Its price is almost similar to the price of AppScan. Both of them are very costly. Its price could be reduced because it can be very costly for unlimited IT scans, etc. I'm not sure, but it can go up to $40,000 to $50,000 or more than that."
"Fortify WebInspect is a very expensive product."
"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."
"The price is around $5,000 USD."
"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."
"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."
"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."
"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."
"They do have a confusing licensing structure."
"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Government
15%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
10%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise15
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise22
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortify WebInspect?
While I am not directly involved with licensing, I can share that our project's license for 1-9 applications costs between $15,000 to $19,000. In comparison, Burp Suite costs approximately $500 to ...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Fortify WebInspect?
WebInspect works efficiently with Java-based or .NET based applications. However, it struggles with Salesforce applications, where it requires approximately 20-24 hours to crawl and audit but produ...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Fortify WebInspect?
I am currently working with several tools. For Fortify, I use SCA and WebInspect. Apart from that, I use Burp Suite from PortSwigger. For API testing, I use Postman with Burp Suite or WebInspect fo...
See all answers
What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?
Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 17% of the time
OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
OWASP Zap vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 11% of the time
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Veracode vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
Qualys Web Application Scanning vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Logo
PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise Edition vs OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
Compared 8% of the time
More OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing Competitors
Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 20% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 19% of the time
Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 11% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 10% of the time
Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 7% of the time
More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing
August 2025
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing reportDownload OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing product report
Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest
August 2025
Parasoft SOAtest reportDownload Parasoft SOAtest product report
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus WebInspect, WebInspect
SOAtest
 

Overview

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing offers robust scalability, ease of use, and high accuracy in scanning, making it a valuable tool for enterprises.

This security testing platform is known for its centralized dashboard, guided scans, and comprehensive reporting. It integrates seamlessly with tools like Fortify code scanner and supports extensive vulnerability detection and analysis, enhancing efficiency in security management. Despite its strengths, users suggest improvements in cloud integration, cost-effectiveness, and installation processes. Faster scans, reduced false positives, and improved mobile testing features are also desired.

What are the key features of OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing?
  • Scalability: Easily adapts to changing enterprise needs.
  • Ease of Use: User-friendly interface with guided scans.
  • Comprehensive Reporting: Detailed vulnerability analysis and reporting.
  • Integration Capabilities: Works with Fortify code scanner and user authentication scanning.
  • Wide Vulnerability Detection: Identifies extensive security vulnerabilities.
What benefits should users expect from reviews?
  • Efficient Vulnerability Management: Streamlines security management in development environments.
  • Detailed Analysis: Provides in-depth insights into security issues.
  • Quick Setup: Easy to deploy within existing systems.
  • Enterprise Preference: Supports enterprise environments efficiently.

In industries like BFSI, OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing is employed for performance network application testing, dynamic and static application security testing, and code checks. Security and QA teams use it in development processes to ensure application security prior to release, proving integral in both enterprise and testing environments.

OpenText

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft
 

Sample Customers

Aaron's
Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
Buyer's Guide
Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)
August 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about HCLSoftware , OpenText, Rapid7 and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST). Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
867,349 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.