OpenText Data Protector vs Quest NetVault Plus comparison

OpenText and Quest Software are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0, while Quest Software is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to Quest Software’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Quest Software users who would recommend it.

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

1,381 Views
837 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Quest NetVault Plus

Read 12 Quest NetVault Plus reviews

1,315 Views
840 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Quest NetVault Plus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and Quest NetVault Plus compete in the data protection category. OpenText Data Protector seems to have the upper hand, excelling in feature set and integration capabilities, although Quest NetVault Plus performs strongly in terms of ease of deployment and user satisfaction.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers extensive integrations with SAP, Oracle, Exchange, SQL Server, VMware, and Unix, along with strong disaster recovery and deduplication capabilities. Its integration with HP's StoreOnce enhances its instant recovery feature. Quest NetVault Plus provides effective snapshot backups, high stability, and a user-friendly interface that can be accessed from any networked device.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector could improve its user interface, reporting, and documentation. Licensing complexity and slow technical support response times are noted as drawbacks. Quest NetVault Plus needs improvements in command-line functionality, scheduling options, and MongoDB integration. Some users also report issues with hardware compatibility and technical support service levels.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector provides deployment flexibility across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, though it is reportedly complex. Customer service experience varies, with some facing delays. Quest NetVault Plus supports both on-premises and private cloud deployments, receiving positive feedback for its stability and simpler licensing model, leading to higher customer satisfaction.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is recognized for its extensive feature set, which comes at a high cost, but users find it justified for larger organizations. The expensive licensing model is a common concern. Quest NetVault Plus offers more flexible licensing, which may limit costs to necessary components. Despite this, both solutions are perceived as valuable due to their effective backup solutions, with ROI linked to reduced data loss risks and improved recovery operations.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 853,118 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Quest NetVault Plus

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

42nd

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (24th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Quest NetVault Plus is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Jeroen Vranckaerts

System Engineer - Server & Storage, DBA at Audi Brussels

Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.

Read full review

Isa Safii

Senior System Engineer at PT. Virtus Technology Indonesia

Comprehensive data protection and reliable backup capabilities enable smooth disaster recovery operations

The features of Quest NetVault Plus ( /products/quest-netvault-plus-reviews ) that are most valuable include the ability to pick up and restore to tape servers and external hard disks. It allows us to pick up from devices and then restore to the same devices or external server storage. Additionally, the application supports scanning files for malware before backup operations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup process for the solution is easy."

"It is a traditional backup model. If you talk about file server and the official Windows database, it's a stable product."

"The normal file system backup is easy to manage, and our success rate is quite high."

"This solution is quite stable because we have only three users."

"The initial setup was relatively easy."

"The installation was simple and provided an easy way to install even on Unix servers. It has excellent features like deduplication."

"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."

"OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

"Quest NetVault Plus has a high level of stability."

"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."

"Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great."

"Quest NetVault Plus is quite effective for managing backups across multiple systems because we don't need to log in to the backup server to manage it; it's web-based, so from any system in the network, you can log in and manage everything."

"The user interface is good."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes."

"If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails."

"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."

More Quest NetVault Plus pros

Cons

"The GUI could be updated. The GUI hasn't changed since version 6. It's on version 10 now. The reporting could also be better. Also, while Data Protector is excellent for backing up physical hardware, it needs more features for backing up VM images because many environments use hypervisor."

"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."

"We have a lot of requests for the Micro Focus team, particularly in terms of the Japanese data pattern, as it's not as good now. The Japanese data pattern accuracy of the Micro Focus Data Protector needs to be improved because there are a lot of false negatives and false positives. We are currently testing this and our product team has been communicating with the Micro Focus team."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"The interface has been the same for many years and needs to be updated"

"We face challenges with its stability."

"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."

"Micro Focus Data Protector must improve its overall evolution record. They need to focus on hardware based instant recovery, client recovery, and cloud ability. Now there is no cloud ability."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement."

"The stability of the solution is poor."

"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."

"Improvements should come, particularly in compatibility, backup performance, or better troubleshooting."

"Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from malware."

"The interface can be improved. It should be more clear what features are available and make them easy to find."

"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."

"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."

More Quest NetVault Plus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."

"It is more affordable compared to other vendors."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"We have many competitors who are pricing better, and we believe that our pricing is higher."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

"When we purchased four licenses, we were given a very good price. However, it is still on the high side when compared to some other vendors."

"The price of our 12-month contract is approximately $1,500 AUD ($1,100 USD)."

"The tool is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

Computer Software Company

15%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?

I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest NetVault ?

NetVault is a great cloud-ready enterprise backup software for hybrid data centers. Here are some of the things I really like about the solution: It is easy to use right out of the box and scales ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Quest NetVault?

If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest NetVault?

Improvements could be made in the deduplication and data management capabilities. There is also a need for better security measures, as security is critical to ensure backups are safe and free from...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 62% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 13% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Tivoli CDP for Files vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 41% of the time

Quest Rapid Recovery vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 13% of the time

Veritas NetBackup vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 13% of the time

vRanger vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 10% of the time

Arcserve UDP vs Quest NetVault Plus

Compared 8% of the time

More Quest NetVault Plus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

May 2025

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Quest NetVault Plus

May 2025

Download Quest NetVault Plus product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

NetVault Backup, Quest NetVault, Quest NetVault Backup, BakBone

Overview

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Quest NetVault Plus is used by organizations for efficient backup in environments such as retail machines, VMware, and virtual servers, including Hyper-V. It supports hybrid environments with Nutanix Xi.

Quest NetVault Plus is designed for backing up databases, applications, and security logs in hybrid environments. It includes a universal backup system with deduplication and allows data path mapping. Users install a client agent on PCs and a server agent for recovery tasks. Commonly used in industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus offers a web interface for network-wide access, dashboards for visualization, and reliable stability and reporting features. While appreciated for its backup management and efficient search capabilities, users desire improvements in its web interface and compatibility.

What are the key features of Quest NetVault Plus?

Efficient Search: Quickly locate tables and databases in backups.
Time-Saving Restoration: Speeds up recovery tasks.
Streamlined Management: Manage backups across different locations easily.
User-Friendly Interface: Offers network-wide access via an intuitive web interface.
Comprehensive Dashboard: Provides clear visibility of backup processes.

What benefits should organizations expect from Quest NetVault Plus?

Stability and Reporting: Reliable backup operations with built-in reporting tools.
Media Utilization: Optimize backup media usage for cost efficiency.
Capacity Planning: Plan for storage needs with detailed reports.
Communication: Stay informed with email notifications on backup status.

In industries like pharma, Quest NetVault Plus is implemented by configuring agents on clients and servers for effective backup and recovery. Its adaptability in hybrid setups with Nutanix Xi enhances server backup management, while its dashboard and reporting capabilities assist in monitoring and optimizing backup workflows across sectors.

Quest Software

Sample Customers

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

intel, Mars, MERK, Microsoft, Uber, Visa

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

853,118 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Data Protector vs. Quest NetVault Plus report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.