OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise comparison

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is 0.6%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise	0.6%
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection	1.7%
Other	93.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2584380

vCIO At Grove Networks Inc. at a computer software company with 11-50 employees

Improving threat detection is critical for enhanced protection

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the contract we have with our clients as a cost-effective option for antivirus protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is cost-effective for rolling it out to all of our clients,…

Read full review

reviewer2162541

IT Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Provides stable and resource-efficient protection but lacks clear modern security features

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is highly compatible and rarely causes disruptions in production. It operates transparently and is easy to maintain. The automated response feature helps to mitigate breaches effectively. When comparing with ThreatDown agent, I have noticed that ThreatDown detects behaviors more readily and flags suspicious user activities more clearly. While Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise remains effective, ThreatDown's user interface is more manageable and provides a clearer system overview. The management interface is crucial for maintaining Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise effectively. A significant advantage of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is its lightweight resource usage. It consumes less memory, CPU, and IO compared to alternatives such as ThreatDown and Bitdefender.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability of the solution is very good. We have about 100 users on it right now, and we use it twice a week."

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome."

"On a scale from one to ten, I would rate Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks a nine."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"The scalability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very good."

"The solution helps find bugs, and it is safe to use to prevent attacks by hackers."

"Palo Alto is the core of the security infrastructure in the environment."

"The information the dashboard provides is very clear."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable aspect of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is that I have never gotten malware with it."

"To date, I haven't had any malware in my system."

"Its ease of installation is valuable. It has been a low-resource tool and the continuous updates in the past have made it attractive from the standpoint of the trust level on the protection."

"The ability to generate profiles specific to both business groups and organizations has made managing nearly 1000 endpoints very simple."

"I like that Webroot is very lightweight. It didn't bog down the machine, and more importantly, it had heuristics artificial intelligence to some degree. It wasn't like full-blown artificial intelligence, but something where you have one endpoint recognizing issues because it maintains a cloud database. If one client recognizes a threat, it would add it to the database, and almost immediately, every agent in the world would also know about that threat. That was very appealing to us. However, now it's becoming commonplace, whereas ventures like Symantec and McAfee were based more on the traditional model of definition and updates, and we were always falling behind. Webroot also has pretty good technical support."

"The initial setup is not complex at all. It's very straightforward."

"The Webroot cloud console is very powerful."

"Webroot's tech support is pretty good; they've given me some pointers."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pros

"The primary feature of the solution is antivirus scanning with IPS. It blocks viruses and uses a signature database, ensuring robust protection when configured correctly to meet our requirements."

"The tool is a secure and stable workstation for checking antivirus. The alerting feature helps us see alerts and is easy to control. The main benefit we derive from using Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is stability."

"The most valuable feature of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is the application. Additionally, they are adding features frequently."

"The overall solution is good, particularly the detection engine. It performs well in identifying malware and conducting regular network scans. The product is easy to use."

"We use the solution for detection."

"Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is highly compatible and rarely causes disruptions in production; it operates transparently and is easy to maintain."

"This was a great product at the very beginning and it has only gotten better as they've added capabilities, so I'm a very big fan."

"Simple and very scalable solution that provides endpoint security and malware protection."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pros

Cons

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a strong tool, but it is true that digesting information sometimes makes the tool go a little bit slower."

"It would be better if they could educate the customers more. Some sort of seminars and roadshows will help educate the customers and show what the product can do. The price could be better. It would also help if they had a team for deployment and support."

"It'll help if customization was easier."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"The main issue I could point out is the offline agents and the way that it is missing."

"Cortex XDR could improve its sales support team, including better commission structures and referral programs."

"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."

"I would like to see some additional features related to email protection included."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I think the one bad point about this product is that we did not find a way for Webroot to generate reports or schedule automatic reports to be sent to clients."

"An updated UI would be nice, but is not hardly used."

"I did notice that my OS slowed down, but I don't know if that's due to Webroot."

"It would be great if there was a feature which would allow you to scan an individual file on an endpoint user's computer."

"Webroot used to be really good when they first came out, but now they've completely fallen behind, sadly."

"One of the biggest pain points is that it's not really ransomware-oriented. They will be able to catch some, but that's where Sentinel One is a better player compared to Webroot."

"The only complaint I have with Webroot is its inability to prevent UoD phishing and its inability to check against bots or block anti-attacks. Plus the URL server is in zero-definition."

"Its detection capability for certain attacks should be improved. It should have better and wider detection for certain malware attacks. It could also have some sort of RMN."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection cons

"Needs to be more user-friendly; lacks a simple way to search data."

"I have contacted support and the speed of resolution could be faster."

"Symantec is selling Endpoint Detection Response as a different solution. If it was incorporated in this solution it would be a good thing."

"The platform could be improved for beginners as it wasn't intuitive to manage initially."

"The tool needs to improve its dashboard."

"The solution's browser protection in Chrome needs to be improved, as it's the most troublesome aspect of the tool. I have two devices where the browser protection failed, an issue that has yet to be fixed for two months. When updates occur, the client restarts, and the browser protection for Chrome malfunctions. Broadcom needs to improve their ability to hijack a browser session to filter web traffic because that's important, as well as site blocking. This element is missing in the product; most companies have firewalls with web content filtering to prevent employees from accessing specific sites."

"The solution could improve its speed, threat coverage, and the tool's functionality."

"An area for improvement for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise would be its firewall features, in particular, this solution needs to provide more control over the firewall."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The return on investment is from the user side because we have seen the performance of it increase the delivery time of the product if we are using too many web-based and on-premise applications. In indirect ways, we saw the return of investment in terms of performance and user satisfaction increase."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"I am using the Community edition."

"Cortex XDR's pricing is ok."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"Webroot is less expensive than SentinelOne."

"Get a trial, then a multi-year license."

"We evaluate other options using multiple choices, best value, management and functionality."

"The solution is pretty cheap, actually. At our level, which is at 2,500 endpoints, we're paying 87 cents an agent per month."

"I can't recall the exact pricing, but I believe there is a monthly fee of $20-30 per user."

"I think the price is fairly reasonable. I was really prepared to pay more, but the price is fine."

"Its cost is not much per month. Our price is a couple of bucks a user."

"We are on an annual subscription for the use of Webroot Business Endpoint Protection."

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection pricing and cost advice

"It's not the cheapest, but it's reasonably priced, around a five on a scale from one to ten. It's suitable for small, medium, and enterprise businesses and offers competitive pricing. There are no additional costs; it's a renewable purchase, either annually or as needed."

"I rate Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise's pricing a two out of ten."

"I rate the tool's pricing a six out of ten."

"The product is neither cheap nor expensive, meaning it is an average-priced solution."

"The price of Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is expensive. When compared to other solutions they should reduce the price."

"The license for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise is paid, but there is a trial for 60 days."

"If you have a variety of different endpoints, including heavily protected endpoints and some endpoints that are in the field, Symantec allows you to apply different licensing so you don't have to put everything under Endpoint Complete."

"I would rate it a seven, indicating a satisfactory and moderate level. Despite being somewhat on the expensive side, it aligns with our long-standing relationship with Symantec, and we find it acceptable."

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Construction Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	53

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is probably on the cheaper side, so I would rate their pricing a one or a two ou...

What needs improvement with Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

Webroot Business Endpoint Protection needs to improve its ability to detect threats. It does not do what it's adverti...

What is your primary use case for Webroot Business Endpoint Protection?

We use Webroot Business Endpoint Protection as a NextGen antivirus solution for our clients. It's included in the con...

What needs improvement with Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

I have not experienced integrated threat intelligence benefits with Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. Many custo...

What is your primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

The primary use case for Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise for my clients is basic antivirus protection.

What advice do you have for others considering Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise?

Several of my customers continue to use Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise. As a system consultant, I recommend an...

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comparisons

Compared 11% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 42% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 5% of the time

Huntress Managed EDR vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Malwarebytes Teams vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 4% of the time

Cynet vs OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Compared 2% of the time

More OpenText Core Endpoint Protection Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security Complete vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 21% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 15% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

WatchGuard EPDR vs Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

More Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection

Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection product report

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection report

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise

Download Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise product report

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Webroot SecureAnywhere Business Endpoint Protection

No data available

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection offers cloud-managed endpoint security with AI integration, providing real-time protection and lightweight performance. It ensures low system impact, seamless cloud integration, and cost-effective security solutions for various devices.

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection is a comprehensive endpoint security platform utilized by managed-service providers for antivirus and firewall functionality across servers, workstations, and mobile devices. It employs AI for robust threat detection, integrating with cloud applications for real-time updates. Multi-layered security features include malware protection, network defense, and DNS protection. Although connectivity and threat reporting need improvement, this platform extensively supports remote device management and integrates efficiently with Active Directory policies.

What are the key features of OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Cloud Management: Centralized admin console for easy oversight
AI Integration: Enhanced threat detection capabilities
Lightweight Performance: Minimal impact on system resources
Real-time Threat Database: Constant updates for effective protection
Web Control Interface: Monitors and controls web traffic

What benefits are associated with OpenText Core Endpoint Protection?

Ease of Setup and Maintenance: Facilitates quick deployment and upkeep
Seamless Cloud Integration: Simplifies scalability and operation
Cost-Effectiveness: Affordable pricing with comprehensive features
Mobile Security Capabilities: Supports remote device management

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection finds application in industries requiring stringent data protection and peace of mind over device security. Managed-service providers implement this for comprehensive antivirus and firewall features, safeguarding multi-device networks. It is particularly useful for DNS protection and integrating with Active Directory policies, enabling secure yet flexible operations across sectors.

OpenText

Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise delivers robust security features like firewall management, anti-malware, intrusion prevention, and real-time AI-based analysis. Its flexibility and resource efficiency, alongside cloud integration, make it a reliable choice for endpoint security.

Offering comprehensive features for proactive protection, Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise provides automatic remediation, policy configuration, and system monitoring through an efficient management interface. It ensures antivirus and endpoint protection against malware, viruses, and network threats in cloud or on-premises environments. Users benefit from its functionality in access control, EDR, threat detection, and network monitoring. However, there is room for improvement in user-friendliness, threat intelligence, and AI-based detection capabilities to address sophisticated threats. Enhanced browser protection, support, and pricing, along with better integration of cloud security and robust firewall controls, are sought after refinements.

What are Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise’s key features?

Firewall Management: Comprehensive firewall configurations to protect against network threats.
Anti-Malware: Effective detection and prevention against malware threats.
Intrusion Prevention: Real-time monitoring and threat detection to stop intrusions.
AI-Based Analysis: Advanced real-time analysis for proactive threat management.
Policy Flexibility: Users can customize and implement varied security policies seamlessly.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

User-Friendly Interface: Ease of use and streamlined management across devices.
Cost-Effectiveness: Competitive pricing offering high value for comprehensive protection.
Cloud Integration: Efficient cloud-based deployment and management options.
Resource Efficiency: Low impact on system resources allowing better performance.
Automatic Remediation: Seamless automatic handling of detected threats.

Various industries utilize Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise to secure endpoints with extensive device and network threat prevention. The solution is often deployed to safeguard financial data, healthcare records, and sensitive information in critical infrastructures, ensuring compliance with strict regulatory standards.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Mytech Partners

Information Not Available

OpenText Core Endpoint Protection vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Enterprise