OpenText AppWorks vs QualiWare X comparison

OpenText and QualiWare are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.7, while QualiWare is ranked #39 with an average rating of 6.0. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to QualiWare’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of QualiWare users who would recommend it.

OpenText AppWorks

Read 10 OpenText AppWorks reviews

343 Views
217 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

QualiWare X

Read 3 QualiWare X reviews

118 Views
66 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

OpenText AppWorks

QualiWare X

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

QualiWare X and OpenText AppWorks are competing in enterprise management solutions, with QualiWare X showing strengths in flexibility and user satisfaction, while OpenText AppWorks leads in advanced features.

Features: QualiWare X offers comprehensive modeling, extensive customization, and high adaptability, making it appealing for businesses focusing on flexibility. OpenText AppWorks has strong integration capabilities, notable automation features, and operational efficiency, which are advantageous for organizations needing seamless workflows.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: QualiWare X provides straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, aiding quick workflow integration. OpenText AppWorks requires more configuration and support to perform optimally, which may be necessary for complex infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: QualiWare X presents competitive pricing and favorable ROI for budget-conscious organizations prioritizing adaptability. OpenText AppWorks has higher upfront costs, justified by its advanced features, offering long-term ROI for businesses requiring comprehensive integration and automation.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText AppWorks vs. QualiWare X Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks vs. QualiWare X

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 850,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText AppWorks

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

QualiWare X

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

39th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText AppWorks is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QualiWare X is 0.1%, down from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) are the BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modules. There is the standard BPM ( /products/informatica-intelligent-data-management-cloud-idmc-reviews ) modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP ( /categories/erp ) system.

Read full review

Gavin Bérubé

Enterprise Architect at a comms service provider with 5,001-10,000 employees

Works as a reference for architecture but not very intuitive

We use the solution as a reference for architecture so that we can connect business data applications. The tool helps us to know how these applications should be built. We use it mainly as reference material. I like the solution's traceability. The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenText AppWorks, especially those incorporating low-code functionalities, have had a significant positive impact. In some cases, we've observed a remarkable reduction in development time, ranging from 50 to 75 percent. The MTP model and life cycle have facilitated rapid development cycles."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"We really appreciate the process automation and how can you create human tasks as one of your processes."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

More OpenText AppWorks pros

"I like the solution's traceability."

Cons

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"OpenText needs improvements in its integration model to align with newer integration types."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"The integration could improve."

More OpenText AppWorks cons

"The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"The price is on the higher side."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

"I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Retailer

Government

35%

Computer Software Company

15%

Media Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText AppWorks?

We've automated several processes, including purchase requisition to purchase orders, RFQ processes, vendor onboarding, project budgeting, and business case creation. The recent versions of OpenTex...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

See all answers

What do you like most about QualiWare X?

I like the solution's traceability.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QualiWare X?

I would rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten since it's pretty expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with QualiWare X?

The solution is not easy and intuitive to use. I would also like the software to have a reference metamodel that can guide the modeling.

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 24% of the time

Appian vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 18% of the time

ServiceNow Now Platform vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 14% of the time

OutSystems vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 12% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText AppWorks

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText AppWorks Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs QualiWare X

Compared 100% of the time

More QualiWare X Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks

April 2025

Download OpenText AppWorks product report

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

March 2025

Download QualiWare X product report

Overview

OpenText Appworks. AppWorks is OpenText's Enterprise Application Development and Management platform. It allows you to quickly and easily build purpose-specific apps for the enterprise using the web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3 and JavaScript. These apps can connect to the OpenText EIM Suite using RESTful API.

OpenText

QualiWare enables positive change by providing tools and methods that ensure coherency, consensus and consistency, and we support the agile and innovative company in handling complex knowledge, maintained by multiple persons with different backgrounds, in a continuous process.

QualiWare

Sample Customers

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

Emiliambiente, OLI, Galletti, Hiref, Bugatti, Argelli, Culligan Italiana, Sal, Stefal Cablaggi, BrainBee Automotive, Varvel, Campagnola, Favini, G.F., Gruppo ROLD

Buyer's Guide

OpenText AppWorks vs. QualiWare X

April 2025

Free Report: OpenText AppWorks vs. QualiWare X

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText AppWorks vs. QualiWare X and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText AppWorks vs. QualiWare X report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.