OpenText ALM / Quality Center vs Tricentis LiveCompare comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0, while Tricentis is ranked #35. OpenText holds a 5.4% mindshare in ALM, compared to Tricentis’s 0.1% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Read 207 OpenText ALM / Quality Center reviews

5,489 Views
2,029 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Tricentis LiveCompare

Read 1 Tricentis LiveCompare review

71 Views
29 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Tricentis LiveCompare

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 27, 2025

OpenText ALM / Quality Center and Tricentis LiveCompare are both competitors in the field of software testing and quality management. The analysis indicates that Tricentis LiveCompare stands out due to its innovative features and efficient data handling capabilities, making it a preferred choice for organizations seeking advanced testing functionalities.

Features: OpenText ALM / Quality Center provides comprehensive test management, strong traceability, and integration with other enterprise systems. Tricentis LiveCompare focuses on automation, real-time analytics, and predictive insights, offering streamlined release processes and enhanced decision-making capabilities for agile teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM / Quality Center has a well-established deployment model with comprehensive support. Tricentis LiveCompare has a flexible and faster deployment strategy with agile support services, adding to its appeal for those prioritizing rapid implementation and continuous support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM / Quality Center requires significant initial investment justified by its feature set. Tricentis LiveCompare offers competitive pricing and quick ROI through efficient automation and analytics, making it cost-effective for organizations seeking maximum value.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

207

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (1st)

Tricentis LiveCompare

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

35th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

SAP Service Providers (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText ALM / Quality Center is 5.4%, up from 5.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis LiveCompare is 0.1%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

Huong Vuong

Sap Fico Consultant at Avient Corporation

Effective testing and good data management with seamless Excel integration

There are cases where the system does not meet our reporting requirements. For example, only the first user can click 'run' during testing, and subsequent users have to click 'continue manual run', which can create reporting errors. Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.

Read full review

it_user713811

Product Manager at Ness Technologies | נס טכנולוגיות

Accurately identifies what will be affected in production after a change or upgrade

The LiveCompare apps that my customers and I have benefitted from the most are analyses and reports on the following: * Upgrades – LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality accurately identifies what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade. * Migration to SAP Hana – LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time. * SAP License management optimization. * Custom code analytics – Includes usage monitoring, quality and performance monitoring, Java analysis, and ABAP code quality. * Testing - LiveCompare optimizes the entire testing phase in upgrade projects.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Easily integrates with Oracle e-Business Suite."

"The tools could be useful if we were utilizing them more effectively"

"Having used the tool before, I like the use of parameters, being able to do exports and reports of the data for monitoring of executions, and the defect management as well. I feel satisfaction in that area."

"It is stable and reliable."

"Ability to customize modules, particularly Defect Tracking module on company specific needs"

"OpenText ALM Quality Center is highly customizable."

"As a stand-alone test management tool, it's a good tool."

"You can plan ahead with all the requirements and the test lab set it up as a library, then go do multiple testing times, recording the default that's in the system."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pros

"LiveCompare's Impact Analysis functionality identifies accurately what will be affected in production as the result of a change or an upgrade. It can also pinpoint accurately the scope of testing needed in anticipation of an upgrade."

"LiveCompare's unique reporting and advanced analytics streamline the entire migration process to SAP Hana, while minimizing costs, risk, and time."

Cons

"The session timeout time needs to be longer in my opinion."

"We are looking for more automation capabilities."

"We would like to have support for agile development."

"Only Internet Explorer is supported. That is a big problem. They don't support Chrome and Firefox and so on."

"I would like to be able to search easier, not just do SQL queries, being able to do free keyword searches on the data. That's valuable."

"Client-side ActiveX with patch upgrades"

"Certain applications within this solution are not really compatible with certain applications like ERP. The problem is when we're trying to use these applications or devices, the solution itself doesn't scale."

"Recently, I faced some issues while using the product on Mac-based machines, as I was unable to upload test cases."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center cons

"From my experience with the product, I would suggest adding a feature that would allow a customer who is reviewing the LiveCompare results to be able to connect remotely with one of IntelliCorp's experts (aside from their support) in order to assist the customer to better understand the results."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing fee is a little expensive."

"It has several limitations in adapting its agility easily."

"Sure, HP UFT is not free. But consider what you get for that cost: A stable product that is easy to use; the kitchen sink of technology stack support; decades of code (which in many cases actually is free); a version that is a stepping stone to an easier Selenium design; and a support base that is more that just the kindness of strangers."

"The pricing is expensive nowadays."

"I don't know the exact numbers, but I know it is pricey. When we talked to the sales reps we work with from our company, they say, "Well, Micro Focus will never lose on price." So, they are willing to do a lot of negotiating if it is required."

"We pay around $30,000 for thirty users, translating to approximately $6,000 to $10,000 per user, which is high."

"It's a perpetual license."

"For pricing, I recommend to buy a bundled package. Check the HPE site for more details."

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center pricing and cost advice

"IntelliCorp is flexible in terms of licensing and the pricing structure. They are open to discussing a customer's specific requirements."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

63%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The most valuable feature is the ST Add-In. It's a Microsoft add-in that makes it much easier to upload test cases into Quality Center.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

The on-premises setup tends to be on the expensive side. It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus ALM Quality Center?

We work with Jira now, and there are some very good workflows. There could be more configurable workflows regarding test case creation approval. I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the mar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

OpenText ALM Octane vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 19% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 19% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText ALM / Quality Center

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText ALM / Quality Center Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText ALM / Quality Center

May 2025

Download OpenText ALM / Quality Center product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download Tricentis LiveCompare product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Quality Center, HPE ALM, Quality Center, Quality Center, Micro Focus ALM

No data available

Overview

OpenText ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass for software quality management. It helps you govern application lifecycle management activities and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes.

OpenText

Tricentis LiveCompare is a comprehensive tool that facilitates automated impact analysis and risk assessment for SAP updates, ensuring seamless integration and minimal disruption.

Designed for SAP environments, Tricentis LiveCompare provides targeted insights for risk-based testing, allowing users to identify critical areas impacted by changes. It enhances efficiency by streamlining test efforts, ensuring updates are implemented without unforeseen issues.

What are the key features of Tricentis LiveCompare?

Impact Analysis: Identifies areas affected by changes in SAP systems.
Automated Testing: Streamlines testing processes, reducing manual effort.
Risk Assessment: Prioritizes test cases based on risk, enhancing focus.

What benefits and ROI can be anticipated?

Reduced Downtime: Minimizes business disruption during updates.
Cost Efficiency: Lowers testing costs with optimized test strategies.
Improved Agility: Enables faster adaptation to SAP updates.

Tricentis LiveCompare is implemented in industries like finance and manufacturing, where SAP systems are integral. It aids in efficiently managing system upgrades and ensuring compliance with industry standards.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Airbus Defense and Space, Vodafone, JTI, Xellia, and Banco de Creìdito e Inversiones (Bci)

Coca-Cola, eBay, BP, British American Tobacco, Surrey Country Council, AES, P66, MUD, Bentley Motors, Coats, Hershey, Kimberly Clark

Buyer's Guide

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

May 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, Microsoft, OpenText and others in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.