OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs OpenText MBPM comparison

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText MBPM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked #27 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText MBPM is ranked #38. OpenText 360 for SharePoint holds a 0.5% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText MBPM’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText 360 for SharePoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText MBPM users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 16 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

556 Views
495 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText MBPM

Read 2 OpenText MBPM reviews

425 Views
349 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

OpenText MBPM

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and OpenText MBPM enhance business processes and collaboration. OpenText MBPM has the upper hand due to its comprehensive process management capabilities, despite SharePoint's significant integration benefits.

Features: OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides seamless integration with Microsoft environments, enabling efficient content collaboration, document management, and easy access to shared resources. OpenText MBPM offers advanced workflow automation, extensive process optimization tools, and powerful business process management capabilities, making it ideal for comprehensive process automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 for SharePoint features an easy deployment model directly within the Microsoft ecosystem, with responsive customer support. OpenText MBPM involves a more complex setup process but includes robust support options that ensure smooth implementation and continuous operation.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 for SharePoint offers cost-effectiveness, especially for organizations using SharePoint, with substantial ROI through improved productivity and collaboration. OpenText MBPM, while having a higher initial cost, provides significant ROI due to its comprehensive automation capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,484 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText MBPM

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

38th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.5%, down from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText MBPM is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Krishnan S

Head - Financial Reporting and Taxation at TVS Capital Funds

Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive

OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Read full review

Jaideep MS

Practice Director at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation

I think the solution's support could do a better job. I rate the support somewhere around four and five out of ten. There is a hoard of people that they get in touch with while contacting them. So we've done some work with them in the past. I mean, we've been a support partner for a while. But apart from that, in terms of understanding the issues for a particular technology, I think there is a lack of people at their end. So they don't really have many people with them. And by the time we could get hold of the right person, especially for production issues, it's a little too late.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

"We have manual processes, so the workflow enables us to automate a number of these processes."

"The benefits that OpenText 360 for SharePoint has brought to my company include improved turnaround time."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."

Cons

"Sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently."

"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."

"In the future, I would like to see new features in SharePoint for improved project tracking processes."

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."

"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"It has a reasonable price."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cost-efficient, and ten is expensive, I rate the pricing somewhere between nine and ten since it is a costly solution."

"There is an annual license to use OpenText MBPM."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 56% of the time

BIC Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 44% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Appian vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 28% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 28% of the time

IBM Case Foundation vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 23% of the time

IBM BPM vs OpenText MBPM

Compared 21% of the time

More OpenText MBPM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

August 2025

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

July 2025

Download OpenText MBPM product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Metastorm BPM

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

OpenText

OpenText's MBPM (formerly Metastorm BPM) delivers the insight, power and agility you need to make your vision for business improvement a reality.

OpenText

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Kommunales Rechenzentrum Minden-Ravensburg/Lippe (KRZ), Hawksford Group, Gauteng Provincial Government Department of Economic Development, Deutsche Post DHL, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, London Underground, Great Clips, Fiat, Rompetrol, Gaston Memorial Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Bachmann, Alliance Healthcare

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,484 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. OpenText MBPM report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.