No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Rapid7 and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Additionally, 100% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Read 65 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews
  • 12,807 Views
  • 7,940 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: July 2026).
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
July 2026
Download the complete report
Helped 909,563 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
65
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (9th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user245400 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user245400
Application Security Engineer at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product.
The ability to exploit injection capabilities It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC. The vulnerability mapping needs some work. I've been using it for one year alongside Rapid7. There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the…
Read full review
MH
Moti Huberman
Penetration Tester & Information Security Expert at a comms service provider with 11-50 employees
Dedicated browser and repeater have improved my proxy testing and manual vulnerability checks
I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something like this because otherwise, nowadays we have to do it manually. Perhaps they can automate it a bit more. Perhaps they could add some automation to things, to see what we do manually, which it has the tools to do manually, and perhaps enable with a click of a button to do things automatically. I'm not too sure which, but I'm sure they can from a product management point of view, do things that we need to do two, three, or four steps manually regarding specific testing. For instance, we want to check something specific if it's this or if it's that. Perhaps to define it once and have it more automatic, perhaps.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC."
"I find all the features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional most useful, particularly the AI enhancement for results and follow-up for retests."
"Unearthing these issues really helps me build confidence and relationships with clients on two counts."
"The most valuable features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional are its ease of use and its cost efficiency."
"This is one of the best tools that I'm using; I found this one much better."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution has a pretty simple setup."
"I find the attack model quite amazing, where I can write my scripts and load my scripts as well, which helps quite a bit. All the active scanning that it can do is also quite a lot helpful. It speeds up our vulnerability assessment and penetration testing. Right now, I am enjoying its in-browser, which also helps quite a bit. I'm always confused about setting up some proxy, but it really is the big solution we all want."
"Enables automation of different tasks such as authorization testing."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pros
 

Cons

"There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the available RAM."
"Sometimes the solution can run a little slow."
"The reporting needs to be improved; it is very bad."
"There needs to be better documentation provided. Currently, we need to buy books, or we need to review online some use cases from other professionals who have been using the solution to find out their experience. It is not easy to find out how to properly do a security assessment."
"Scanning APIs using PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional takes a lot of time."
"In general, there's not much to complain about but the stability of the tool is not good enough."
"The interface for the automatic scan can be improved because it is easy for technical users, but the business users have trouble with it."
"The solution lacks sufficient stability."
"There should be a heads up display like the one available in OWASP Zap."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Pricing is not very high. It was around $200."
"PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is an expensive solution."
"At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool."
"They should reduce the license cost a little bit. It is $400 per user, and it would be better if they could reduce the licensing fee."
"Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."
"The yearly cost is about $300."
"Burp Suite is affordable."
"We are using the community version, which is free."
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise35
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?
OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The cost of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is reasonable at approximately $500 per year per user.
See all answers
What needs improvement with PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
I'm hoping perhaps for something to make it easier, such as to define things where if a message or a response is such and such, automatically make a request that is such and such. Perhaps something...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

OpenText Core Application Security vs NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] Logo
OpenText Core Application Security vs NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL]
Compared 100% of the time
More NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] Competitors
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 18% of the time
Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
Software Risk Manager ASPM vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 6% of the time
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 6% of the time
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 5% of the time
SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
SonarQube vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 4% of the time
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
July 2026
NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] reportDownload NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
July 2026
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reportDownload PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report
 

Also Known As

NTOSpider
Burp
 

Overview

While today's malicious attackers pursue a variety of goals, they share a preferred channel of attack - the millions of custom web, mobile, and cloud applications companies deploy to serve their customers. NTOSpider dynamically scans these applications for vulnerabilities across all modern technologies, provides tools that speed remediation and monitors applications for changes.
Rapid7

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is a vital tool for cybersecurity experts, valued for features like Intruder and Repeater, and offering strong automation for effective vulnerability detection and web security.

PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional aids organizations in conducting comprehensive application security testing. With functions like scanning, proxy setup, and numerous plugins, it provides essential support for vulnerability assessments and penetration testing. Despite needing improvements in reporting, false positive reduction, and scanning speed, it remains adaptable for different security operations through its automation, extensive community support, and regular updates. Licensing and pricing flexibility are considerations, alongside API security enhancements and documentation improvements. Widely used for intercepting and scanning web applications pre-launch, it supports compliance testing while offering tools for request replaying, traffic manipulation, and brute forcing.

What are the key features of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
  • Intruder: Automates attacks to test web application vulnerabilities.
  • Repeater: Lets users send modified requests to observe responses.
  • Extender: Supports additional functionalities through plugins.
  • API Support: Offers capabilities for automated workflows and integrations.
  • Vulnerability Scanner: Efficiently detects application security flaws.
What benefits should users consider?
  • Affordable Pricing: Offers value through cost-effective plans.
  • Community Support: Access a robust network for troubleshooting and advice.
  • Automation Capabilities: Streamlines security testing processes.
  • Regular Updates: Continuous improvements and feature developments.

In industries like finance and healthcare, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is implemented to enhance application security frameworks. It provides critical insights for regulatory compliance and risk management. The tool's adaptability supports organizations in routinely identifying and addressing vulnerabilities, ensuring robust protection against potential threats and facilitating secure application launches.

PortSwigger
 

Sample Customers

University of Salzburg, Chr. Hansen, American Chemical Society, North American Retail Chain, Wiltshire Council, Redner's Markets, Acosta Sales & Marketing
Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
July 2026
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about SonarSource Sàrl, Checkmarx, Veracode and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: July 2026.
DOWNLOAD NOW
909,563 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.