Nolio Release Automation vs Spinnaker comparison

Broadcom and Spinnaker are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while Spinnaker is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.3. Broadcom holds a 1.1% mindshare in RA, compared to Spinnaker’s 1.7% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Spinnaker users who would recommend it.

Nolio Release Automation

Read 51 Nolio Release Automation reviews

565 Views
525 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Spinnaker

Read 4 Spinnaker reviews

366 Views
366 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Nolio Release Automation

Spinnaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Nolio Release Automation and Spinnaker compete in the continuous delivery and release management space. Nolio has the upper hand in pricing and support, focusing on cost-effectiveness and customer care, while Spinnaker outperforms in feature richness with advanced deployment capabilities, justifying a higher investment.

Features: Nolio Release Automation offers seamless integration capabilities, comprehensive environment support, and value-driven service. It integrates with diverse deployment scenarios and allows precise monitoring of deployments. Spinnaker provides advanced continuous delivery pipelines, scalability across cloud providers, and intuitive interfaces for Kubernetes integration, enabling flexible multi-cloud deployments.

Room for Improvement: Nolio could enhance its scalability and expand community resources. Its dashboard features could be made more user-friendly, and further reducing the learning curve would benefit new users. Spinnaker should simplify initial setups, broaden support channels beyond community resources, and minimize complexity in pipeline configurations to improve usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nolio supports straightforward deployments with robust customer support, facilitating easy setups. Spinnaker's model is feature-rich but requires a steeper learning curve, with community-driven support guiding users through its extensive capabilities.

Pricing and ROI: Nolio presents lower initial setup costs, maximizing budget efficiency with a quick ROI through valuable service and support emphasis. Spinnaker, with potentially higher upfront costs, offers significant long-term ROI by leveraging its extensive features and cloud adaptability, fitting those seeking feature-rich growth potential.

To learn more, read our detailed Nolio Release Automation vs. Spinnaker Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation vs. Spinnaker

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nolio Release Automation

Ranking in Release Automation

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Spinnaker

Ranking in Release Automation

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of Nolio Release Automation is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spinnaker is 1.7%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh B N

DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital

Real-time monitoring and seamless integration enhance deployment efficiency

The main disadvantage I see is the limited awareness of Nolio Release Automation in other organizations. It is a very nice tool, but its market presence is limited. I heard from the organization that the licensing cost was somewhat expensive. Perhaps focusing on marketing efforts would be beneficial. It is a really nice tool, and I am unsure why many organizations are not using Nolio Release Automation. It is one of the greatest tools for continuous deployment, yet its popularity remains limited. Some organizations are not aware of its existence. This might be an area worth researching and potentially developing new marketing strategies.

Read full review

Anurag Bandyopadhyay

Product Development Engineer at Razorpay

Useful to create custom pipelines

Regarding areas for improvement, one significant issue is the lack of maker-checker flows to ensure that newly created pipelines are accurate and tested. We currently use an in-house abstraction over Spinnaker to verify pipeline specs, environment variables, etc. It would be beneficial if Spinnaker could offer this functionality within their product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The CA Application Insight feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"The graphical view of when you're writing flow is the most valuable feature."

"One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames."

"The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback."

"Spinnaker is used for automating a variety of deployment tasks, infrastructure, provisioning tasks, and all kinds of things."

"There is a good community around the product that makes troubleshooting possible."

"The tool's most valuable feature is its intuitive interface for converting existing Kubernetes specs into working pipelines. It's easy for anyone to deploy anything on any environment when they need to test or deploy for a specific merchant or use case. Instead of going into the specs and changing different variables, they can do it through the UI, which is very useful."

Cons

"In version 6.6, we faced numerous performance issues. This might be because it is a six-year-old version, and we are supporting nearly 1,500 applications and 15,000 to 16,000 agents."

"It could use better integration with development tools."

"The configuration of the solution is a bit difficult to maneuver. They should work to make it easier."

"A concern with CA Release Automation is that Automic was acquired by CA recently. We're a bit concerned that CA strategy is going with Automic, that CA Release Automation is dead. They are not investing in it too much... They do say, that in the next two or three years we don't need to worry. They will still provide support for CA Release Automation. But we're not sure how CA Release Automation will evolve."

"In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters."

"When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning."

"Regarding areas for improvement, one significant issue is the lack of maker-checker flows to ensure that newly created pipelines are accurate and tested. We currently use an in-house abstraction over Spinnaker to verify pipeline specs, environment variables, etc. It would be beneficial if Spinnaker could offer this functionality within their product."

"Every time it goes to run a pipeline, it just generates a lot of data, and its database is not exactly tuned out of the box, meaning it is not tuned for high scalability."

"Spinnaker's configuration setup is too complicated and should be made easy."

"Log-wise, we need to understand why something has failed so that we can understand and try to fix it the moment the issue is reported. The solution could use more robust monitoring."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."

"Spinnaker is a free-to-use, open-source solution."

"Spinnaker is an open-source product. The tool is completely free for users."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

63%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nolio Release Automation?

One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nolio Release Automation?

Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools. The pricing could be cheaper. In our organization, we've been using it f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nolio Release Automation?

When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning. There's also not many instructional materials and videos on pl...

See all answers

What do you like most about Spinnaker?

The most valuable feature of Spinnaker is the rollback.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Spinnaker?

The solution is open-source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Spinnaker?

See all answers

Comparisons

GitLab vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 100% of the time

More Nolio Release Automation Competitors

Octopus Deploy vs Spinnaker

Compared 37% of the time

GitLab vs Spinnaker

Compared 25% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs Spinnaker

Compared 22% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Spinnaker

Compared 16% of the time

More Spinnaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation

August 2025

Download Nolio Release Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

July 2025

Download Spinnaker product report

Also Known As

CA Release Automation

No data available

Overview

CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.

Broadcom

Spinnaker provides application management and deployment to help you release software changes with high velocity and confidence. Spinnaker is an open-source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform that combines a powerful and flexible pipeline management system with integrations to the major cloud providers. If you are looking to standardize your release processes and improve quality, Spinnaker is for you.

Spinnaker

Sample Customers

CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation vs. Spinnaker

July 2025

Free Report: Nolio Release Automation vs. Spinnaker

Find out what your peers are saying about Nolio Release Automation vs. Spinnaker and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nolio Release Automation vs. Spinnaker report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.