We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and SoftExpert BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"It has helped us a lot, especially during the initial phase of a project where most of the things are done on paper."
"It saves time as tasks are automated."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"The integration capabilities have been very useful."
"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"A complete project management suite in one integrated package."
"The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"I think it was lacking a little bit in its multiple in-house processes and other processes. So there is a little bit of a gap in collaboration."
"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"Currently, a notable challenge lies in the alignment of user experiences across the eight or nine applications within the suite. Transitioning between applications can be somewhat cumbersome due to varying user interfaces. However, the provider is actively addressing this concern by consistently rolling out updates every four to five months, aimed at harmonizing and streamlining the interfaces. This ongoing effort is expected to enhance the user experience over time. In terms of functionality and features, the platform stands out, offering flexibility with the option for both on-premises and cloud deployment. This flexibility extends to the RPA tool, providing clients with choices tailored to their preferences. An advantage lies in the shared security and data infrastructure across the toolset, facilitating smooth data transfer between applications. This contrasts with experiences with Oracle, where data transfer may involve complexities such as the need for intermediary file formats like TXL or SCZ."
"The cost of the solution is high and has room for improvement."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"We would like to design parallel workflows and long-running workflows, along with new features for connecting to cloud-based systems."
"The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve."
"It could do more to use all the data it collects to intelligently manage the user experience."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SoftExpert BPM is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while SoftExpert BPM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoftExpert BPM writes "Quick deployment, high availability, and easy to use". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas SoftExpert BPM is most compared with . See our Nintex Process Platform vs. SoftExpert BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
