New Relic vs Statseeker comparison

New Relic and Techniche are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. New Relic is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2, while Techniche is ranked #75. New Relic holds a 1.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Techniche’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Techniche users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 176 New Relic reviews

24,526 Views
7,113 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Statseeker

Read 38 Statseeker reviews

2,722 Views
2,613 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

New Relic

Statseeker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Statseeker and New Relic are competing products in network monitoring and application performance. New Relic appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features, making it worth its higher price.

Features: Statseeker offers comprehensive network monitoring with real-time data, rapid polling intervals, and detailed reporting capabilities. It focuses on network insights. New Relic provides full-stack observability, advanced analytics, and precise application performance metrics, emphasizing application performance and end-to-end observability.

Room for Improvement: Statseeker could enhance its application performance features, offer better integration capabilities, and improve its user interface for more intuitive use. New Relic might improve its pricing model to be more cost-effective, simplify its feature set for basic users, and enhance network insights to match its application monitoring strength.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Statseeker's deployment is straightforward, focusing on network infrastructure with reliable customer service. New Relic offers quick cloud-based setup and robust customer service, making application-focused implementations streamlined.

Pricing and ROI: Statseeker's setup cost is moderate and provides effective ROI for basic network monitoring needs. New Relic has a higher setup cost, justified by its extensive features and comprehensive analytics, delivering substantial ROI for those needing extensive application performance management.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. Statseeker Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. Statseeker

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

176

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (4th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), AIOps (4th)

Statseeker

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

75th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of New Relic is 1.5%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Statseeker is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	1.5%
Statseeker	0.5%
Other	98.0%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

John Elhariry

Team Leader at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

We can set up a dashboard to monitor the status of an entire site, which provides more insight into any issues across devices

One engineer is enough for the solution's maintenance. There has been a significant improvement in Statseeker in the last few versions. It includes a wallet map and features we plan to implement when deploying the latest or penultimate versions across all our sites. This will significantly assist in identifying sites surpassing thresholds or KPIs, making issue detection much more accessible. The threshold feature is handy for identifying delays and major outages. This graphical map enables us to quickly assess the scope of nationwide problems, allowing for swift action and efficient reporting to management and service providers. This tool facilitates monitoring by visualizing all network elements with their respective coordinates, highlighting any downtimes or issues through color-coded green for operational, orange for approaching thresholds, yellow for minor alarms, and red for critical issues. The tool is a monitoring tool that helps in identifying problems. It is necessary to have someone trained to set up the dashboards because they might require some programming or specific configuration skills. Once it's configured, it works well. It's not as straightforward as other tools where you plug in the device, and everything works. With Statseeker, you still need to put in some effort to set up your dashboard properly. It requires someone with good training and proficiency in setting up these dashboards. They can benefit the technical and operations teams, providing useful insights into the network and the executive management team to receive reports on the overall network health. Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is quite good."

"New Relic has been in the business for a while, it offers a wide selection to attach a monitoring mobile app, server, and cloud, and if you want to go with just one product, it fits all your needs."

"We have done the New Relic integration with Serverless AWS, which has helped us with monitoring, and keeping our monitoring from our on-premise part with the cloud part."

"It is easier to create new dashboards in the New Relic interface, and it is also easier to query if when I want to monitor a different parameter or time duration on my dashboard."

"The most valuable feature for us is the ability to see what is going on with the apps on our web server."

"It enables us to fine-tune our application quicker."

"To receive all the metrics for each system regarding its application, the user in the interface for all the dashboards can type the hostname and can see all the tools in that host, it is a very powerful view."

"Breadth of features, user experience, and constant development of the platform, as well as the value it’s adding to our business."

More New Relic pros

"The graphics and trends are the most valuable for us."

"Just recently, we were having some issues with a certain site, and it was only Statseeker that showed us what the problem was."

"We are now able to easily track where problems are with bandwidth and port errors, rather than having to do a lot of diagnostics."

"This solution will help to find problem endpoints sooner, or other issues such as throughput and network congestion."

"This solution provides us with a quicker response in troubleshooting."

"Statseeker reduces the complexity of your network monitoring."

"We haven't encountered any issues with stability."

"This is a very cheap solution in order for us to accomplish what we needed to do in terms of providing visibility into the network."

More Statseeker pros

Cons

"The licensing cost is a little high and it should be brought down."

"I would like better alerting."

"The solution should include more detailed reports for SQL database requests."

"The only limitation we experience is with Insights query limit of 1,000 transactions."

"There may be issues with scalability with individual users sending events up to the cloud."

"It gives you amazing statistics, but doesn’t give you enough information about what to do with the statistics."

"The pricing could be improved as it is quite high relative to what is offered."

"The mobile application monitoring has been pretty difficult to set up and also quite expensive."

More New Relic cons

"I would like to see NetFlow improved, with better reporting capabilities that are similar to Scrutinizer."

"I don't know that the solution has had much of an impact on the complexity of our network monitoring."

"I would like to see a friendlier user interface in the administration tool."

"I do not feel that this solution is very scalable."

"There is a little bit of room to improve in the alerting section to give some more options there. It's all I can think of right now off the top of my head."

"If it had more detailed NetFlow information then it would be far better."

"This product provides some good functionality. However, the reporting is right to left, which is less than ideal, the cost is significantly high, and the NetFlow capabilities are lacking."

"It would be very nice to have the Cisco ACI option included in the regular license."

More Statseeker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price was one of the reasons we chose this solution."

"Comparatively, the pricing is expensive."

"There is a picture which goes to your browser and it monitors requests from other users. However, it's impossible to use now because the price is very high. The feature is very nice, but I tried it during the trial period, and the current price makes it impossible to use."

"The new licensing model is great, as we pay for what we use (in computational units). However, the pricing is expensive compared to other tools."

"The pricing and licensing are good if you have an account manager and a partner manager who are looking to help out."

"The price of New Relic could improve. It is expensive."

"The pricing is fine."

"The detection piece of it brings us a big return on investment."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"Up until we actually talked to Statseeker, and Statseeker came and gave us an enterprise licensing model for multiple accounts, I would have said the pricing was not good value. The fact they've come to the party now and given us a very good discount, I would say it's probably about right, the pricing they're giving us now. But the retail pricing, if I went out and, as a separate company, and asked for pricing for one account, I probably would say their retail pricing is not competitive. The fact that they've given us a discount now because we have multiple servers across multiple accounts, I would say that pricing is about right, but not their retail pricing. It's too expensive."

"This tool would probably be priced well if it had deeper NetFlow capabilities, but for our use case, in particular, we're only recovering ports after ninety days and looking at circuit congestion, it's pretty pricey."

"It would definitely be a yearly licensing cost, but I don't know what it is."

"We paid $5,000 to $10,000 a year in maintenance."

"Compared to other solutions such as Zabbix and AKiPS, this solution is very well priced."

"We have permanent licenses so there's really no cost, other than ongoing maintenance. When I think about it, that's running us about $20,000 a year."

"One thing that needs improvement is how it's licensed. I understand historically the company licensed it off a same charge for everyone. I understand the company needs to make money, but how they introduced the tiered licensing model, and then multiple layers of licensing was a bit of an issue. So, on the whole, coming up with a licensing model that isn't confusing and complicated and is easy to understand would be one way to improve the product. They have told me lately that they're changing how they license stuff, but they haven't made that - as I understand it - in their marketing material public knowledge as of yet. I would say that at the moment it's a bit convoluted. It's confusing. Some of their basic licensing model is a bit of a ripoff. If you go over five or ten support calls in the basic licensing model they start charging you for support calls. I think that's a bit rich."

"Pricing is reasonable but licensing should unlimited."

More Statseeker pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

15%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	52
Large Enterprise	79

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

I find New Relic to be somewhat expensive. Our team shares logins, contrasting with other applications where individual team accounts are standard. Pricing is a primary concern since New Relic can ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for New Relic Insights?

As an Application Monitoring Engineer, my primary responsibilities include ensuring the uptime of services, managing infrastructure, and monitoring transactions. I use New Relic to set up incidents...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs Statseeker

Compared 16% of the time

Nagios XI vs Statseeker

Compared 9% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Statseeker

Compared 8% of the time

Pico Corvil Analytics vs Statseeker

Compared 6% of the time

Zabbix vs Statseeker

Compared 5% of the time

More Statseeker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

August 2026

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

Statseeker

July 2026

Download Statseeker product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

No data available

Overview

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

New Relic

Statseeker provides comprehensive network monitoring with features such as interface statistics, bandwidth utilization, and robust alerts for outages and temperature issues.

Statseeker offers extensive network visibility, including Traffic Analyzer, historical data access, and a user-friendly dashboard. Its fast data retrieval and detailed reports improve internal communication and monitoring. The platform's scalability, reliability, and low maintenance make it an efficient choice for network monitoring. Areas for improvement include interface design, NetFlow features, and integration with systems like Dynatrace and Cisco ONS. Reporting could be more intuitive, and enhancements in alerting options, documentation, and configuration management are needed.

What are the key features of Statseeker?

Interface Statistics: Provides detailed data on network interfaces and bandwidth utilization.
Traffic Analyzer: Offers precise traffic analysis tools for better network management.
Historical Data Access: Allows users to retrieve past network performance metrics quickly.
User-Friendly Dashboard: Simplifies navigation and access to critical information.
Scalability: Supports network growth without significant changes to existing setup.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Enhanced Network Visibility: Facilitates in-depth understanding of network performance.
Reliable Alerts: Ensures timely identification of issues with responsive ping alerts.
Ease of Maintenance: Reduces the resources required for ongoing management.
Improved Communication: Utilizes reports for effective internal communication.
Data-Driven Decision Making: Empowers users with real-time and historical statistics.

In industries, Statseeker is implemented for tasks like monitoring up/down status, capacity management, and traffic analysis. Users leverage it to generate reports, manage congestion, and track device performance across network layers. Its ability to provide real-time statistics supports evidence-based decisions for upgrades and improves insight into network availability and device utilization.

Techniche

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

With active deployments in over 22 countries and many Fortune 100 firms, Statseeker monitors millions of interfaces in real-time. Some example customers include: FedEx, Optus, Verizon, California State University, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monash University, Texas A&M University.

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. Statseeker

August 2026

Free Report: New Relic vs. Statseeker

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. Statseeker and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. Statseeker report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.