NetScaler vs SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager comparison

"Helped us a lot with load balancing."

"Load Balancing and SSL offloading are key features."

"The most valuable feature of Citrix ADC is its ease of use."

"The flexibility in configuration options is impressive."

"Most of the functions are user-friendly and great."

"The solution is very stable. We don't have any downtime or issues of that nature."

"Manageability and visibility are good."

"Provides resiliency for applications that reside on servers, as well as connectivity to remote applications."

"The scanning features have proven to be highly valuable, particularly due to the comprehensive information they provide."

"Its main functionality is highly beneficial as it centralizes the management of configuration items across the network."

"It is a stable solution."

"It's perfect for network configuration management. It's easy to use."

"The tool is useful for security purposes."

"It allows us to manage backups in big companies. It is also useful in managing the configuration changes."

"We push all our configurations to the servers with ease and the logs capture almost all the transactions needed for an internal audit."

"This solution has helped our organization by allowing us to store all the device configurations for the various network devices in NCM and making it easy for us to retrieve and look them over."

"The setup was not simple."

"We had some bugs in the previous firmware. These were not big issues, but more testing on the firmware would be key to happier customers."

"We face challenges with the solution's firmware upgrades frequently."

"Getting to use some of the advanced tools, even with the assistance of Citrix support, can be challenging."

"The interface needs to be improved because the competition is coming up with ones that are more eye-catching, straightforward, and sophisticated."

"The WAF component needs to be simplified so that it is easier to use."

"An area for improvement would be the difficulty in finding information about standard licensing costs over the internet. They should provide some reference prices on the net to be quickly referred to."

"It can be difficult to setup."

"I'd like to see additional features like support for devices that don't use CLI for configuration backups, expanded inventory support for other vendors beyond Cisco, and compatibility with newer SD WAN devices. These enhancements would further improve the product's versatility and utility for users. we hope for future enhancements, especially in supporting security devices that lack CLI backup options."

"When it comes to the way of managing the network devices, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager should provide the simplest way that devices can relate to the server. For example, when we want to get the devices on board, we go by SSH to make the SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager create the connectivity with the device. After that, we pull the configuration. It would be helpful if they could combine both so that everything will be done in one step."

"On NCM, reporting could be a bit better. It's completely become just one report. When I try to create a custom report, the solution just commits old server data."

"The only thing that requires some experience, and training doesn't fix, is how to set up your custom policy-based reports to check compliance."

"We want to be able to store it in a data warehouse format and integrate it with Google single sign-on."

"Its look and feel can be improved. They can also put in more effort into building the THWACK community and use the information about various customer issues and requests to build the new releases."

"For each device, when you open the network performance monitor, it will give you all of the information about the device, but many of the natural configuration management features are not on that page."

"Further improvements in automation are needed. Currently, there are limitations in performing tasks without logging into routers directly, and we expect more comprehensive device control."

"Citrix NetScaler's pricing is slightly above average but not overly expensive. I would consider F5 BIG IP to be the most expensive, Citrix NetScaler to be the second most expensive, and then Kemp Load Balancer to be the third."

"It is very pricey, but we get it. If you need the best, money shouldn't be a problem."

"The license for Citrix NetScaler is on an annual basis and it is reasonably priced."

"The client pays for the Citrix NetScaler license annually."

"When compared to other solutions, the cost is high."

"The solution is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"This product is more expensive than some of the competitors."

"We get value for money. Its price is fair. I don't think it is overpriced."

"In Africa, the cost is a major factor in decision-making for many companies. As a result, some companies may choose cheaper solutions, even if they are open-source, over more expensive ones, such as SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager. However, as an engineer, I believe that the functionalities and services offered by SolarWinds justify the cost. Nonetheless, many companies in Africa may still view the prices as unaffordable."

"There is a license needed to use SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager."

"We have to pay additionally for its support and maintenance."

"Pricing is reasonable and competitive."

"I have a yearly subscription."

"There is a license for the use of this solution and it is priced well, there is a lot of value for the money."

"Additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee are inevitable."

"You have a base license for 50 devices, and then you can add more licenses as you go."