Netdata vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Netdata and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Netdata is ranked #33 with an average rating of 9.0, while Splunk is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3. Netdata holds a 1.1% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 2.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Netdata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

Netdata

Read 2 Netdata reviews

2,580 Views
2,090 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk Observability Cloud

Read 85 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews

14,270 Views
5,565 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Netdata

Splunk Observability Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Splunk Observability Cloud and Netdata compete in the observability and monitoring space. Splunk is favored for its advanced features and analytics, while Netdata is noted for cost-effectiveness and simplicity.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics, machine learning capabilities, and real-time monitoring, suitable for large-scale operations needing detailed insights. Netdata provides lightweight architecture, real-time health monitoring, and easy setup, ideal for smaller to mid-size infrastructures. Splunk focuses on extensive analytical tools, whereas Netdata emphasizes simplicity and efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk provides comprehensive deployment models with extensive customer service and documentation, fitting organizations needing tailored solutions. Netdata offers simple deployment with community-driven support, emphasizing straightforward access and community backing.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk involves higher setup costs, offering high ROI through powerful features, appealing to enterprises aiming for long-term gains. Netdata's low setup cost and fast time-to-value through simplified solutions provide attractive ROI for budget-friendly businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: May 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

May 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,099 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Netdata

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

33rd

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

21st

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (16th)

Splunk Observability Cloud

Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring

7th

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th), Network Monitoring Software (7th), Container Management (5th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Netdata is 1.1%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 2.1%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Infrastructure Monitoring Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Splunk Observability Cloud	2.1%
Netdata	1.1%
Other	96.8%

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

Featured Reviews

YeshwanthKumar Sundar

Site Reliability Engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees

Real-time monitoring has improved incident detection and simplifies per-second troubleshooting

The key area for improvement is data retention and historical analysis. Netdata is excellent for real-time monitoring, but for long-term storage and deep historical insights, it usually needs to be integrated with other tools. Improving built-in long-term retention would make it more complete. Another area I see is data aggregation, where it correlates multiple nodes; while it provides great per-node visibility, having more advanced centralized views and correlations across systems would help in larger-scale environments. Customization of alerts and anomaly detection could also be enhanced. One area needing improvement is access control and security features. Stronger RBAC and user management would help control who can view data. Another area would be customization of dashboards, alerting integrations, and improving enterprise-level scalability features.

Read full review

Taiwo Ige

IT Operations Engineer at ABC Supply Co. Inc.

Alerting improves incident response across teams and enables faster awareness before customer impact

Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved in terms of integrations with more technical add-ons, such as Zoom. Although they have one with Zoom, it's not available in the cloud, so having that feature would be beneficial. Essentially, Splunk should continue expanding to create easier ways to ingest logs from different products. The out-of-the-box customizable dashboards in Splunk Observability Cloud are very effective in showcasing IT performance to business leaders. However, there are aspects that could be improved, such as linking dashboards to one another. While IT leaders may not drill down, it's crucial to create levels of dashboards for technical users to find root causes, making it effective for stakeholders.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Netdata has positively impacted my organization by improving downtime and incident response workflows through real-time visibility into infrastructure and application performance."

"The biggest ROI I have seen is in incident detection, with improvements of forty to fifty percent, troubleshooting time by thirty to forty percent, and productivity gains of around twenty-five to thirty percent."

"I have definitely seen a return on investment with Splunk Observability Cloud, particularly through how fast it has grown and how comfortable other teams are in relying on its outputs for monitoring and observability."

"Splunk APM provides a holistic view of the application. Unlike other APMs, Splunk's service map is quite effective."

"The maintenance of Splunk Observability Cloud is very easy; it's manageable."

"The ability to create custom dashboards is one of the best features and that's typically why most people deploy Splunk."

"The alerts are the most valuable feature."

"This product is very stable."

"The initial setup was straightforward."

"It has been beneficial for our IT infrastructure."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pros

Cons

"The key area for improvement is data retention and historical analysis."

"In terms of pricing, I have one issue with Splunk Observability Cloud; in a large-scale organization, it does not have features such as cost optimization or budgeting for observability spend."

"Splunk Observability Cloud has not yet completely improved our operational performance for our company's resilience as we are just starting out, however, it will help us ultimately to reduce incident time."

"The licensing model is expensive. We need to monitor the amount of data ingested because the cost is based on the data collected."

"When we have too many detectors in place for one particular app, such as when I have created 50+ detectors through my account, the entire page becomes a bit loaded when creating the 51st detector, feeling heavy and taking time to load."

"The security could be better."

"We still use Splunk Enterprise licensing. A lot of the newer features go into Splunk Cloud before Enterprise. We're not looking to switch our licensing over, so we're falling behind on the newer features."

"There are always areas for potential improvement to enhance its functionality and user experience."

"There is not a lot of support for the tool's on-premises version, especially since everything is on the cloud."

More Splunk Observability Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is based on several factors, including the scale of deployment."

"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"I am not in that circle, but we are currently licensing based on our queries. That is working out for us. Previously, it was by volume of data, and now, we can store as much data as we want."

"This is an expensive solution."

"It appears to be expensive compared to competitors."

"Splunk's infrastructure monitoring costs can be high because our billing is based on data volume measured in terabytes, rather than the number of devices being monitored."

"Licensing cost is the biggest argument I get from those divesting from Splunk. There are those within our organization who say we are going to go to other tools since Splunk is too expensive."

"Splunk APM is expensive."

More Splunk Observability Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Transportation Company

65%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	55

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Netdata?

As I am going with the subscription-based model in the SaaS, the pricing and setup cost are very nice, and the setup is very easy since I am running the server inside GCP.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Netdata?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Netdata?

I have been using Netdata for the past one and a half years, mainly for real-time monitoring and quick visibility into system performance. During this time, I have used it to monitor CPU, memory, d...

See all answers

What do you like most about SignalFx?

The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SignalFx?

Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SignalFx?

The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds ipMonitor vs Netdata

Compared 10% of the time

Zabbix vs Netdata

Compared 9% of the time

LogicMonitor vs Netdata

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Netdata

Compared 8% of the time

Checkmk vs Netdata

Compared 7% of the time

More Netdata Competitors

Avantra vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Kentik vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Grafana vs Splunk Observability Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Server Monitoring

April 2026

Download Netdata product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk Observability Cloud

May 2026

Download Splunk Observability Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring

Overview

Netdata offers real-time performance monitoring and troubleshooting across infrastructures. It provides deep insights and metrics visualization, ensuring seamless operation and efficiency for IT systems.

Netdata is widely regarded in IT environments for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities utilizing a highly adaptive data collection approach. It supports a large array of metrics enabling users to maintain peak performance. Users can visualize data with clarity, allowing for quick identification of issues and efficient resource management. Netdata employs an open-source approach, ensuring flexibility and community-driven enhancements.

What are Netdata's key features?

Real-time Monitoring: Provides immediate insights into system performance.
Scalability: Handles complex environments, monitoring thousands of nodes.
Extensive Integrations: Compatible with multiple data sources and platforms.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors visualizations to specific needs.
Low Resource Usage: Minimizes system impact while monitoring.

What benefits can be expected from Netdata reviews?

Accelerated Issue Resolution: Quickly identifies anomalies and reduces downtime.
Enhanced System Performance: Continuous monitoring boosts efficiency.
Cost-Effectiveness: Open-source model lowers overheads while providing robust features.
Community Support: Benefits from a wide array of contributions and shared expertise.
Increased Scalability: Grows alongside your infrastructure needs without redundancy.

Netdata finds application in industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology where uptime and performance are critical. Its flexible architecture adapts easily to these sectors, ensuring reliable monitoring for cloud operations and on-premise systems alike.

Netdata

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?

Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.

Why consider this for ROI?

Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara

Buyer's Guide

IT Infrastructure Monitoring

May 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: May 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,099 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors and best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.