We performed a comparison between NetCrunch and Wazuh based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Reporting on NetCrunch is pretty good. It's very similar to SolarWinds. It's just a different interface. The majority of everything there was beneficial."
"It has efficient SCA capabilities."
"My company implemented Wazuh because it was relatively inexpensive. They could quickly get their hands on it to check a box for some audit and compliance."
"The product’s interface is intuitive."
"Wazuh is free and easy to use. It is also adjustable, and we can use it on the cloud and on-premises."
"Its cost-effectiveness is the most valuable aspect."
"Wazuh automatically scans the host for CIS benchmarks for the latest updates and vulnerabilities and gives a host score. It provides a percentage of perceived risk due to of non patches or any missing patches on that work."
"Wazuh's best features are syscheck, its ability to immediately resolve vulnerabilities, and that it's open source."
"The deployment is easy and they provide very good documentation."
"I didn't care for the role-based, permission-based options, which were not the best."
"Wazuh needs more security and features, particularly visualization features and a health monitor."
"The implementation is very complex."
"They could include flexibility and customization capabilities by modifying for customers based on partner agreements."
"Alerts should be specific rather than repeatedly triggered by integrating multiple factors. This issue needs improvement to create a more efficient alert system."
"We would like to see more improvements on the cloud."
"It would be great if there could be customization for the decoder portion."
"Wazuh should come up with more in-built rules and integrations for the cloud."
"The tool doesn't detect anomalies or new environments."
Earn 20 points
NetCrunch is ranked 76th in Log Management while Wazuh is ranked 2nd in Log Management with 38 reviews. NetCrunch is rated 8.0, while Wazuh is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of NetCrunch writes "A network monitoring platform with a useful reporting feature, but permission-based options could be better". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wazuh writes "It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services". NetCrunch is most compared with Zabbix, PRTG Network Monitor and Fortinet FortiSIEM, whereas Wazuh is most compared with Elastic Security, Security Onion, Splunk Enterprise Security, AlienVault OSSIM and Graylog. See our NetCrunch vs. Wazuh report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.