NetApp FAS Series vs Veritas NetBackup comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

NetApp FAS Series
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
100
Ranking in other categories
Deduplication Software (5th), NAS (2nd), Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) (1st)
Veritas NetBackup
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
112
Ranking in other categories
Backup and Recovery (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Deduplication Software category, the mindshare of NetApp FAS Series is 2.0%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Veritas NetBackup is 2.9%, down from 6.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Deduplication Software
Unique Categories:
NAS
17.6%
Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)
19.6%
Backup and Recovery
3.7%
 

Featured Reviews

TW
Aug 10, 2023
Offers fast data transfer between NetApp systems and highly scalable, accommodating clusters with significant storage capacity
The SnapMirror is a good tool because, as long as you're going NetApp to NetApp, it's ultimately the fastest way to move data. We replicate everything to another site for disaster recovery. We like the SnapMirror technology or Snapshot technology that allows us to recover directly off the NAS rather than backing it up to a secondary device. Just the ease of management, and it's very highly scalable. We've got one cluster that has about one and a quarter petabytes of data, and then we replicate that to an off-site. So altogether, we've got over three petabytes of data. And if it wasn't compressed and deduped like it is, we probably have more like eight or nine petabytes of data. So it does a really good job with that. AFF is obviously the faster model because our AFFs are all flash, and they're a lot faster.
JT
Oct 23, 2023
Great backup capabilities with good customizations and lots of implementation options
I was involved in the deployment. The process was rather complex. You do need some skill to implement it. It took one year to really migrate to the new product. You need to set up all your cabling and firewall ports and make sure that your solution is available for the infrastructure you want to backup and restore. Technically, you need to involve other people that you want to have file-level backups or database backups. You need to know what to back up and what you don't need to back up. You need to do some test backups and test restores to make sure that everything is available. We had four people managing the implementation and we have two people now handling maintenance.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is stable."
"Using the built-in Snapshots and SnapMirror technology, we were able to have better working data protection locally and off-site."
"The initial setup was so straightforward. It was well-documented."
"The input and output per second performance are satisfactory."
"Can use both SAN and NAS at the same time."
"The most important features are SnapVault, Snapshots, and SnapMirror."
"The product is user-friendly and helps to evaluate the performance of each node. It ensures that if one node encounters an issue, the system can immediately redistribute the workload without interruptions. This setup provides uninterrupted operation for our systems."
"It has a very good implementation of the Active Directory services, so implementation into a Windows network is easy."
"The solution is easy to scale."
"We can easily expand the ability of the solution."
"I have found the Media Server Deduplication tool, deployment policies, and agentless features to be the most valuable features."
"Veritas NetBackup Automatic Image Replication and CloudCatalyst features allow me to replicate deduped backup images from one site to a remote site, as well as duplicating deduped images to the Cloud (i.e. AWS S3, etc.)"
"The tool's most valuable feature is backups."
"I like NetBackup's accelerator feature. You can take a full backup with incremental speed and integrate it with block tracking."
"The troubleshooting is very good."
"Backup and recovery software with great stability, and can support large-scale environments."
 

Cons

"For long term partnership in Myanmar, the local warehouse should be built in Myanmar that's something I'd like to see. We have some issues with supply so there is sometimes a delay in getting the hardware."
"Cluster mode needs to be more ubiquitous."
"As I see it, there could be more interfaces, more cache, etc."
"Its operating system is very cumbersome. However, after you set it up, it runs pretty smoothly. Its file system is not very dynamic. It is very static."
"The solution’s pricing is expensive."
"NetApp is costly when compared to Dell."
"Technical support needs to be improved, as there are no longer partners in our country."
"It lacks automatic tiering, When you use data, some of it goes cold. It is not hot data, so the system should automatically move that data to the SATA, while the hot data is kept on tier-one, the SaaS or SSD drives."
"Technical support only gets back to us the following morning."
"The security and performance could improve with Veritas NetBackup. The security could be improved by protecting the data from attackers."
"You cannot tell what your costs are going to be by using the dashboard, which is something that should be improved."
"I would advise not to use this tool. I think between the licensing issues and the older solution mentality it is not a great solution."
"The deployment time is longer than it is with other products."
"The restoration method and the compression ratio need improvement."
"There could be granular control over metadata components, specifically in the context of JSON data for the product."
"We would like the Java console to be updated."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The scalability is pretty good, but it's too expensive."
"It’s difficult for us to get money, so make sure you get everything in order, because there’s no going back and saying “oh, I missed this or that”, so make sure you plan well and well in advance."
"I don't recall the price, but in general, pricing can always be better."
"There are products available in market with comparatively lower costs."
"The licensing cost is on yearly basis."
"The price of the NetApp FAS Series is reasonable and it provides value for the money with the feature sets. NetApp FAS Series are competing with Huawei storage which has an office and does aggressive marketing with a discount. However, we found that if our customers do a technology refresh they are happy with the performance of the NetApp FAS Series."
"It is a moderately low-priced platform."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being expensive. We pay a one-time purchase price."
"The software and license are very expensive."
"The solution is expensive compared to other alternatives."
"Veritas NetBackup's price could be a problem for small businesses."
"The solution is expensive."
"Smaller virtualized environments will want to stick to a traditional licensing model if possible. It will likely be cheaper, but it is a pain to manage all the individual licenses for each client."
"It is very expensive. The licensing cost for this solution is on a yearly basis. It is approximately 50k. We will continue using it at least for the next year, but we are currently doing an analysis to switch to some other solution."
"So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional."
"The licensing fees are expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Deduplication Software solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
60%
Computer Software Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
4%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which SAN product would you choose: IBM FlashSystem (FS9500) vs PureFlash Array/X NVMe vs PureFlash Array/XL NVMe?
Have you considered a NetApp FAS Storage for your NAS needs? I am sure it fits very well.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp FAS Series?
The pricing depends on the disks we choose. We got quite a good price compared to Huawei Dorado because we compared the prices between NetApp SSD and Dorado, and the price was quite similar.
What is the best next generation backup tool?
Assuming you have an onprem ecosystem which runs the VMware, physical systems on Win, Linux and Unix and run both traditional DB's and nosql DB's like mongo, then Netbackup (NBU) will be the right ...
What do you like most about Veritas NetBackup?
The most valuable feature of cloud integration is the ability to send data outside of your location. This can be achieved by integrating cloud tier options or other object storage solutions.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Children's Hospital Central California, Plex Systems, PDF PNI Digital Media, Denver Broncos, PDF KSM Legal, Clayton Companies, Virginia Community College
Beta Offshore
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp and others in Deduplication Software. Updated: June 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.