IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

MySQL vs NuoDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
Read 55 MySQL reviews.
12,409 views|10,615 comparisons
NuoDB Logo
400 views|343 comparisons
Featured Review
Buyer's Guide
Relational Databases
June 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2022.
609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I am using the Community Edition, which is available free of charge."
  • "This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
  • "It's an open-source database management system that can be used free of charge."
  • "Microsoft licensing for SQL Server is probably ten times more expensive. I used to work for the government, and I remember when we were looking into upgrading to the enterprise version of SQL Server 2019, the licensing was going to cost 350,000. To get the equivalent in the cloud, it was going to be about four grand to get the same processing power and everything else. With MySQL, it was going to be about 300 for the same licensing. Cost-wise, for sure, there is a huge difference. Would you prefer to pay 300 a month or 3,000 to have the same amount of data resources? You might lose a few options that you need, but it isn't worth the price difference."
  • "This product has a good price point."
  • "There is a licensing cost because we are going for a proprietary product. There are some other versions for which there is no licensing cost."
  • "It has a community version."
  • "It is open-source."
  • More MySQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The easy access to the data and the ability to sort the data with multiple methods are very valuable features.
    Top Answer:Sometimes, I get lost in the toggles and buttons, and a better visual design would be nice. The layout is not user-friendly or efficient. I would like to be able to sort the data easily without having… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    12,409
    Comparisons
    10,615
    Reviews
    55
    Average Words per Review
    505
    Rating
    7.9
    26th
    Views
    400
    Comparisons
    343
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Firebird SQL logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    PostgreSQL logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    MariaDB logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Oracle Database logo
    Compared 34% of the time.
    SQL Server logo
    Compared 23% of the time.
    CockroachDB logo
    Compared 19% of the time.
    SingleStore logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Oracle Multitenant logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview

    Until its recent acquisition by Oracle, MySQL was possibly the most renowned open source database enterprise package that could be accessed completely for free. With the merger, the server increased both its features and its price tag, but there is still a free version available to the general community to contribute ideas and suggestions.

    MySQL is a fast and relatively inexpensive database management system. It can easily integrate with a wide variety of programming languages, and it is considered to be a very reliable option. One of the most prominent features that customers seem to enjoy is the easy scalability of this system.

    NuoDB is a distributed database that can be deployed in any datacenter, in any cloud, anywhere, without the compromises inherent in other NewSQL solutions. Distributed SQL Database
    Offer
    Learn more about MySQL
    Learn more about NuoDB
    Sample Customers
    Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.
    Forbes, UAE Exchange, GadgetKeeper
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    University9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Comms Service Provider29%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company35%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Wholesaler/Distributor7%
    Financial Services Firm7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business49%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise66%
    Buyer's Guide
    Relational Databases
    June 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Teradata and others in Relational Databases. Updated: June 2022.
    609,272 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MySQL is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 55 reviews while NuoDB is ranked 26th in Relational Databases. MySQL is rated 8.0, while NuoDB is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of MySQL writes "Good beginner base but it should have better support for backups". On the other hand, MySQL is most compared with Firebird SQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle Database, MariaDB and SQL Server, whereas NuoDB is most compared with Oracle Database, SQL Server, CockroachDB, SingleStore and Oracle Multitenant.

    See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

    We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.