We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and Oracle GoldenGate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"When we talk about the APIs, there are multiple policies one can apply on APIs, like rate limiting policies, OWASP policies, and OWASP security policies, that can be easily configured in Mule Anypoint Platform."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"With Oracle GoldenGate, you can easily sync the tables and put them into the ODS database."
"It allows us to migrate from one system to another, from one server to another, with no downtime, no outage. We can get the data synchronized with multiple databases and then switch the connectivity across to the new servers."
"Data migration is the most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate."
"Ease of installation, maintenance and powerful outputs and supporting Big Data and Cloud environment as well as OGGCS (Oracle Golden Gate Cloud Service)."
"The CDC feature is interesting."
"The product's microservice architecture is scalable."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It doesn't take too much time or effort to implement the solution."
"You can use Oracle GoldenGate as a DR for your system."
"It has different types of subscriptions. For platinum or lower subscriptions, there are not too many things that can be done. We don't see many features. They should release a basic version that has logging and monitoring features. These features should come with Mule Anypoint Platform for free instead of making customers pay separately for these features. Its dashboard can be improved to have a lot of charts so that it is easy to visualize information. The utilization part can be improved. The dashboard is good currently, but it can be better. Other solutions like Elastic have a good dashboard, and they allow you to administer the product from the UI. Currently, for RTF, there is a different dashboard or utility. It would be good to include the same utility in the cloud solution. It would be good if there is a centralized repository that includes the links to the information about various troubleshooting issues. The documentation is there currently, and it is good, but the troubleshooting information is too scattered. We have to go to different links to find troubleshooting information. This kind of centralized repository would be helpful for new customers who are implementing this solution. It will be helpful to see different kinds of issues that can occur."
"The initial setup should be made easy and the documentation should have some guidance."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"It would be better if we had a clearer view of the solution's future releases."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"We would like an entire DevOps in place in this particular solution."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"GoldenGate is expensive. It's costly because this solution is unique in our market. The GoldenGate Cloud Service is cheaper than the on-premise solution."
"A clean and user-friendly graphical interface based on common design principles would be beneficial."
"I find the user interface to be difficult for non-technical people."
"The product lacks some features and it's expensive."
"I would like to see the interface more graphical and easier to use."
"There are a lot of bugs in the solution."
"Lacks the ability to become a full-scale ETL tool."
"It would be better for Oracle Golden Gate Studio GUI to include other licensed products (i.e. Veridata or others)."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Integration with 39 reviews while Oracle GoldenGate is ranked 6th in Data Integration with 47 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while Oracle GoldenGate is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle GoldenGate writes "Performs real-time replication without data loss, but we cannot do much automation". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas Oracle GoldenGate is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Qlik Replicate, Quest SharePlex, Azure Data Factory and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI). See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. Oracle GoldenGate report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
