We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and MuleSoft Composer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Customers can make use of Runtime Fabric, an RTF environment."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"Whenever we need some support in our local language, we get it easily. They also have an office in Germany and if a person is unable to contact them by phone, they can go to the office in person."
"Overall, it is a pretty good product. It is also very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The most valuable features of the Mule Anypoint Platform are the Flex Gateway, API management, easy-to-use, and connectors. Additionally, they are coming out with improvements to the solution when required."
"The solution's market place for different kinds of integration platforms is the most valuable feature."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The advantage of using MuleSoft as part as the Salesforce ecosystem is that anything new they build is guaranteed to work with the new features that are coming from the other side."
"The product is easy to use. You don't need programming skills to use it."
"The prebuilt connectors have saved our customers a lot of time and money."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"The pricing can be a little bit less."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required, especially when compared to other tools, like Dell Boomi or Oracle."
"There is not much information on the internet...The transforming message is an area in the solution that needs to be improved."
"The stability could be better."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"This solution could be improved by offering more integrations with other platforms."
"The technical support team's response time must be improved."
"MuleSoft Composer needs to improve its interface and scalability."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 39 reviews while MuleSoft Composer is ranked 9th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 3 reviews. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while MuleSoft Composer is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MuleSoft Composer writes "The prebuilt connectors save a lot of time and money, but the customer support and price must be improved". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration, Azure Data Factory and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas MuleSoft Composer is most compared with Workato, Celigo Integration Platform, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Zapier and Jitterbit Harmony . See our Mule Anypoint Platform vs. MuleSoft Composer report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.