IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • MOVEit vs. RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]

MOVEit vs RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo
Control-M
Read 36 Control-M reviews.
31,067 views|12,851 comparisons
Progress Software Logo
MOVEit
Read 1 MOVEit review.
2,243 views|1,712 comparisons
RepliWeb Logo
RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]
views| comparisons
Featured Review
Zahidullah Williams
In real-time, I can monitor jobs, failures, or anything that might be stuck
Our SAP jobs are fairly critical, because there are a lot of collections from a financial aspect coming through on a daily basis. From that regard,... Read more →
Use MOVEit?
Use RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]?
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
May 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: May 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
607,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
  • "This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."
  • "The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
  • "You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."
  • "Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
  • "BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
  • "You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."
  • "There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    607,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
    What is the biggest difference between Oracle DAC Scheduler and Control-M?
    Top Answer:Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:As soon as you have an issue, a ticket is created and the tech support is quite responsive.
    Read all 36 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Ipswitch File Transfer, Ipswitch Managed File Transfer
    Learn More
    BMC
    Progress Software
    RepliWeb
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility
    Ipswitch Managed File Transfer is an automated file transfer system to manage, view, and control all file transfer services. You will always know where your files are with predictable and secure delivery, extensive reporting, and easy integration with existing systems.
    Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.
    Offer
    Learn more about Control-M
    Learn More
    Learn more about MOVEit
    Learn More
    Learn more about RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    Cambridgeshire County Council, Capita Document & Information Services, Enterasys, City of Guelph, Hermes
    Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Retailer9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company32%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Insurance Company8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise79%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    May 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: May 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    607,127 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    MOVEit is ranked 12th in Managed File Transfer (MFT) with 1 review while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is ranked unranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT). MOVEit is rated 6.0, while RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of MOVEit writes "It satisfies our requirements but they don't do new improvements as per the market". On the other hand, MOVEit is most compared with AWS Transfer for SFTP, IBM Sterling File Gateway, BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer, HelpSystems GoAnywhere MFT and Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct, whereas RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with Kiteworks, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, Cornerstone MFT and Safe-T Secure Application Access.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.