Mist AI and Cloud vs Omada Access Points comparison

Juniper and TP-Link are both solutions in the Wireless LAN category. Juniper is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.5, while TP-Link is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. Juniper holds a 1.5% mindshare in Wireless LAN, compared to TP-Link’s 4.0% mindshare. Additionally, 77% of Juniper users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TP-Link users who would recommend it.

Mist AI and Cloud

Read 25 Mist AI and Cloud reviews

2,750 Views
2,255 Comparison Views

77% willing to recommend

Omada Access Points

Read 15 Omada Access Points reviews

3,091 Views
3,060 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Mist AI and Cloud

Omada Access Points

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 31, 2024

Omada Access Points and Mist AI and Cloud compete in the network management space. Omada Access Points lead in pricing and support, whereas Mist AI and Cloud are preferred for their advanced features.

Features: Omada Access Points deliver cost-effective and reliable wireless performance, centralized management, and compatibility with existing network infrastructure. Mist AI and Cloud offer AI-driven insights, customizable dashboards, and automated troubleshooting, enhancing network efficiency with intelligent management options.

Room for Improvement: Omada Access Points could enhance their AI capabilities, improve automated troubleshooting, and offer more advanced insight features. Mist AI and Cloud could work on reducing the high initial setup costs, expand their basic support services, and simplify initial deployment steps for users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Omada Access Points ensure straightforward setup and dependable support, facilitating integration into current systems. Mist AI and Cloud provide an innovative cloud deployment model with proactive support, minimizing manual configuration through advanced AI automation.

Pricing and ROI: Omada Access Points provide a budget-friendly option with lower initial costs, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. Mist AI and Cloud, while more expensive upfront, promise a higher ROI through operational cost reductions due to their advanced AI functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Mist AI and Cloud vs. Omada Access Points Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Mist AI and Cloud vs. Omada Access Points

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,889 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Mist AI and Cloud

Ranking in Wireless LAN

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Omada Access Points

Ranking in Wireless LAN

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Mist AI and Cloud is 1.5%, down from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Omada Access Points is 4.0%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Wireless LAN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Omada Access Points	4.0%
Mist AI and Cloud	1.5%
Other	94.5%

Wireless LAN

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Junaid Khatib

Technical Lead at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Has improved troubleshooting efficiency with AI-driven insights but requires a simpler user interface

Mist AI and Cloud has integrated artificial intelligence and introduced a Marvis tool, making troubleshooting much easier compared to Cisco, Extreme, or any other vendor. The Marvis tool includes Marvis Action and Marvis Mini. In Marvis Mini, you can enter the MAC address, site name, or device name to get complete details of any issues the device is facing. If you enter the MAC address of a device, it will show the types of issues such as roaming, authentication, or IP address problems. This eliminates the need to manually search for errors on the controller. The troubleshooting has been significantly simplified through Marvis Mini, which is integrated with AI. Additionally, Marvis Action helps with alerting and monitoring, showing how many devices are down and what kinds of connectivity, DHCP, or authentication issues exist, providing alerts without the need to manually monitor all devices. Mist AI and Cloud is very effective at managing user experience through its AI capabilities. It helps reduce downtime by providing alerts that allow us to work directly on issues without waiting for system failures.

Read full review

reviewer1253430

Development & Innovation Expert at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

They have good specs, and the price is lower than competing solutions

Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development. They could also enhance the reporting capabilities. At the same time, Omada's reporting has improved considerably in the latest version. That was an issue for us, but now it seems okay. More carrier-grade integrations should be available on Omada access points in the future. They could also add a hot spot and maybe a mobile upload solution. I still have issues from time to time when switching access points. I'm still connected to the SSID, but my signal drops when I switch from 5 Ghz to 2.4 Ghz. I'm not switched to the other access point that is closer to me. I should have been switched automatically to the other access point. Occasionally, the handoff doesn't work. I have tried this with WiFi 6, and it worked fine, so I think they may have resolved this issue in the latest versions.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"If you compare wired versus wireless, it's convenient. You don't need to have one place for connectivity. You can move around and it's easier. Sometimes it's a hassle to work with wires, which is why wireless is so convenient."

"Mist AI and Cloud has integrated artificial intelligence and introduced a Marvis tool, making troubleshooting much easier compared to Cisco, Extreme, or any other vendor."

"Mist AI and Cloud is the best solution I have seen in the industry, especially from the artificial intelligence perspective, as it helps businesses."

"Has an extremely good feature set."

"Mist AI and Cloud is ideal as we move towards the AI world."

"Regarding features, the solution seems to be very intuitive."

"The triangulation feature can be used to determine where a person is in relation to the access point."

"AI-driven automation helps implement the solution quickly."

More Mist AI and Cloud pros

"We use Omada Access Points for the network and Wi-Fi."

"This product is easy to use."

"When this solution is set up, it is solid. It offers fast deployment."

"Omada is easy to manage, has cloud management features, and is easy to set up."

"The pricing is reasonable."

"The most valuable feature of TP-Link Auranet EAP is its high performance."

"The solution has been dependable and has kept up with modern technology."

"The performance and availability of Omada Access Points have met our business needs, particularly in improving network control and facilitating direct access for developers to branch services."

More Omada Access Points pros

Cons

"Mist AI and Cloud should be marketed more and focus on making partners in the industry."

"The user experience should be improved. It's not user-friendly."

"The inter-functionality with other vendors was a negative for us."

"The solution lacks documentation."

"Currently, the solution lacks the ability to configure with other solutions from other vendors."

"The support needs improvement. Since the merger or integration between Mist AI and Cloud and HP, it has affected service quality negatively."

"The area for improvement is that Juniper is not as market dominant as Cisco, so they should focus on making their GUI more user-friendly, as it is currently a bit complex and users may not fully understand the available features."

"Juniper should integrate all their dashboards instead of having separate dashboards...Since it lacks the integration of dashboards, Juniper needs to improve it."

More Mist AI and Cloud cons

"The solution takes a long time to switch to another connection, which should be improved."

"Aruba has better scaling capabilities."

"There is room for wider improvements and additional features to enhance managing capabilities."

"We have some issues with stability. It is not so fast. That is the main problem."

"Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover."

"It is less affordable for smaller businesses."

"Omada could add some API integrations that would help with our automated solution. We're trying to integrate, and we're having some issues because some of the calls are not there. The API still needs some development."

"The price of the solution is an area requiring improvement since I want the solution to be made available at a cheaper price than its current market price."

More Omada Access Points cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is not cheap, but it's a reliable solution and very easy for management."

"The solution's price is too high for the end-users. My customers pay 1,000 USD towards the licensing cost of the solution every year."

"The price is about the same compared to other vendors. There is an add-on license, but it's up to you if you want to buy it or not."

"The solution is expensive in Brazil."

"The price of this product is approximately the same as competing products in the market."

"Depending on the features, I think it's quite reasonably priced, especially considering the facilities of the product."

"The custom licensing is a little bit expensive and I would rate it 7.5 out of 10."

"The annual cost is a significant issue for us, and it notably contributes to the overall price. We have a customer with nearly fifty-eight access points in a multifunctional building, and while the setup was relatively simple, the yearly licensing cost is substantial. For the specific features we utilize, the licensing amounts to about forty thousand euros annually. This is not a trivial expense and significantly impacts the overall cost, making it quite high."

More Mist AI and Cloud pricing and cost advice

"The price of the solution is not a lot for five people to use it."

"TP-Link is a good price. They have a good price. But technology-wise, it has to be better."

"The price is affordable, and we haven't had any additional costs due to having a limited number of users."

"TP-Link provides solutions that are more cost-effective than other well-known brands."

"The cost is about 500 Brazilian real per access point, with no additional recurring costs."

"There is no need to pay for the licensing costs since my company is in South Africa. Omada Access Points can be termed as a medium-priced product."

"We don't have to pay for the license because the solution has no subscription cost."

"On a scale of one to ten for pricing, with one being cheap and ten being expensive, I would rate Omada Access Points at a one for its cost-effectiveness."

More Omada Access Points pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Mist AI and Cloud?

AI-driven automation helps implement the solution quickly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mist AI and Cloud?

My rating for pricing is five, where ten represents a low price and one represents a high price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Mist AI and Cloud?

The area for improvement is that Juniper is not as market dominant as Cisco, so they should focus on making their GUI more user-friendly, as it is currently a bit complex and users may not fully un...

See all answers

What do you like most about TP-Link Auranet EAP?

We don't have any issues 90 percent of the time. It works fine in most situations. It has been a success story for delivering WiFi services in Romania. Our customers are happy, and I've been satisf...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Omada Access Points?

Omada needs improvement in the distance it can cover. I am looking for an access point that can cover long distances.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Omada Access Points?

I am trying to design a wireless network with Omada equipment. I have deployed Omada in office areas, and now I want to deploy it in a hotel. The company size where I usually deploy is medium-sized...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Wireless vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

ExtremeCloud IQ vs Mist AI and Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

More Mist AI and Cloud Competitors

Ruckus Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 17% of the time

Aruba Instant vs Omada Access Points

Compared 11% of the time

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 9% of the time

Ubiquiti WLAN vs Omada Access Points

Compared 8% of the time

Aruba Wireless vs Omada Access Points

Compared 7% of the time

More Omada Access Points Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Mist AI and Cloud

December 2025

Download Mist AI and Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

Omada Access Points

December 2025

Download Omada Access Points product report

Also Known As

Mist Access Points

TP-Link Auranet EAP, TP-Link EAP, Auranet EAP, Auranet

Overview

Mist AI uses a combination of artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data science techniques to optimize user experiences and simplify operations across the wireless access, wired access, and SD-WAN domains.

Data is ingested from numerous sources, including Juniper Mist Access Points, Switches, Session Smart Routers, and Firewalls for end-to-end insight into user experiences. These devices work in concert with Mist AI to optimize user experiences from client-to-cloud, including automated event correlation, root cause identification, Self-Driving Network™ operations, network assurance, proactive anomaly detection, and more.

Juniper also leverages Mist AI for next-generation customer support. It is the foundational element behind Marvis, the industry’s first AI-driven Virtual Network Assistant, which provides extensive insight and guidance to IT staff via a natural language conversational interface.

With Mist AI, operators save time and money with faster problem resolution and fewer onsite visits. Users benefit from a network infrastructure that is more predictable, reliable, and measurable.

Juniper

Omada access points provide a business-class wireless network solution that’s flexible, manageable, secure, and easy-to-deploy. The free EAP Controller software allows users to manage hundreds of EAPs at multiple sites, all from a single location. The ability to control, adjust and visualize the entire network from any connected PC makes centralized business Wi-Fi management more efficient than ever before. Omada EAPs also feature captive portal and advanced RF management functions, which make them ideal for demanding, high-traffic environments such as campuses, hotels, malls and offices.

TP-Link

Sample Customers

Dartmouth, Hitachi, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Nebraska Furniture Mart, NTT, Okta

Reflections Resort,Sim Lim Square, Hotel Mary Colombia, Peru WISP, Chase Grammer School

Buyer's Guide

Mist AI and Cloud vs. Omada Access Points

December 2025

Free Report: Mist AI and Cloud vs. Omada Access Points

Find out what your peers are saying about Mist AI and Cloud vs. Omada Access Points and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,889 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Mist AI and Cloud vs. Omada Access Points report.

See our list of best Wireless LAN vendors.

We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.