Midigator vs ThreatMetrix comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Midigator, an Equifax Company Logo
24 views|9 comparisons
ThreatMetrix Logo
3,143 views|1,890 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Midigator and ThreatMetrix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention.
To learn more, read our detailed Fraud Detection and Prevention Report (Updated: February 2024).
757,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I am not aware of the price. I have always come in after it has been negotiated. The clients do get a return on their investment. It mitigated a massive DDoS, and it definitely detects fraudulent activities on banking platforms. They have definitely got their ROI back because there is continued investment in ThreatMetrix over time."
  • More ThreatMetrix Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
    757,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The pricing could be lower. We are a young company. Maybe for big enterprises, price doesn't matter. However, for young companies, price-wise, it's not that good. It's a bit pricey. You also have to… more »
    Top Answer:The solution needs upscaling in terms of interface. It could be intuitive.
    Average Words per Review
    Average Words per Review
    Learn More

    Midigator provides a comprehensive, multi-layer approach to resolving disputes and preventing chargebacks.
    Refund transaction disputes to avoid chargebacks, prevent threshold breaches, and keep merchant accounts in good standing.
    Identify the underlying reason for transaction disputes and solve issues at their source. Trade temporary solutions for long-term prevention.

    ThreatMetrix Digital Identity Network constantly identifies fraudsters from trusted customers by analyzing more than 850 transactions each second of every day. It defends against data breach and credential testing from bots designed to mimic human behavior and evade detection by web application firewalls and integrates fraud and risk data across the enterprise with behavioral information on more than 1.4 billion digital identities for smarter, faster and better risk decisioning.
    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Trip Advisor, Stone Hub, TD Bank, Rabobank, GoPro
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    Financial Services Firm43%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise78%
    Buyer's Guide
    Fraud Detection and Prevention
    February 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: February 2024.
    757,260 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Midigator is ranked 57th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while ThreatMetrix is ranked 2nd in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 2 reviews. Midigator is rated 0.0, while ThreatMetrix is rated 8.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatMetrix writes "Fast with good profiling and offers good rules". Midigator is most compared with , whereas ThreatMetrix is most compared with BioCatch, FICO Falcon Platform, Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub, iovation FraudForce and IBM Trusteer.

    See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.

    We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.