No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Red Hat Data Grid comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 25, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB
Ranking in NoSQL Databases
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
115
Ranking in other categories
Database as a Service (DBaaS) (3rd), Managed NoSQL Databases (1st), Vector Databases (1st)
Red Hat Data Grid
Ranking in NoSQL Databases
21st
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is 5.6%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Data Grid is 2.2%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
NoSQL Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB5.6%
Red Hat Data Grid2.2%
Other92.2%
NoSQL Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Aman-Narang - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Manager at Infosys
Real-time messaging has transformed customer updates and now powers responsive AI experiences
The primary benefits of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB include horizontal scalability. The main advantage is that it handles data growth without requiring database redesign when traffic increases. Low latency access is another key benefit, as read and write operations are very fast, which is extremely helpful for real-time applications. Flexibility is also valuable because Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB uses JSON schema format, which contrasts with traditional table schemas that require time-consuming changes. In modernization scenarios where client requirements change rapidly, Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB offers more flexible schema design. High availability is another important feature, as it is well-suited for business-critical systems. My overall experience using Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB with other Azure services shows that it is more flexible compared to SQL Database and more readable because of its JSON format, making it easy to understand. It is more interactive because viewing the Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB schema clearly shows what is happening in the application and what will be achieved. In contrast, SQL requires writing many queries to obtain details, making Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB more suitable and flexible. My team's experience developing with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB SDKs and APIs has been very comfortable and easy to implement. We are currently migrating .NET applications to Python-based AI solutions using Copilot, where we performed reverse engineering and are moving to forward engineering. We use APIs to connect with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB and manage database containers and items, performing CRUD operations such as create, delete, and read operations, and querying JSON. We are using REST APIs with Python-based solutions, with a service layer and Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB integration.
Use Red Hat Data Grid?
Leave a review
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
919,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Legal Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
33%
Computer Software Company
13%
Government
7%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business36
Midsize Enterprise24
Large Enterprise60
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?
I have knowledge about the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspect of Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?
Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB could improve cost and performance management to be more straightforward, particularly for teams managing workloads with variable traffic. More detailed and proactive reco...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB?
My main use case for Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB is to support application workloads that require a highly scalable, low latency NoSQL database. I primarily use it to store and manage semi-structured...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Microsoft Azure DocumentDB, MS Azure Cosmos DB
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

TomTom, KPMG Australia, Bosch, ASOS, Mercedes Benz, NBA, Zero Friction, Nederlandse Spoorwegen, Kinectify
TTTECH, Thai bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, MongoDB, Redis and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: October 2026.
919,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.