We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure API Management and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of use of the solution is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure API Management is monitoring. When compared with Apigee, I prefer Microsoft Azure API Management."
"Azure API Management is an API gateway that can be used for different purposes, for example, to monetize APIs."
"Easy to integrate API management platform. It is a stable and scalable solution."
"The tool helps to manage APIs."
"Without a doubt, it has a very robust, strong marketplace where we can directly integrate with existing APIs and begin working on those."
"The Azure Active Directory Synchronization is quite good."
"The initial setup is not that complex, but there are certain challenges."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"Microsoft Azure API Management should have the ability to allow multitenancy."
"Sometimes when immediate support is required, it isn't available."
"One of the most important improvements for us would be if it supported the HTTP/3 version and new protocol over a quick connection."
"The licensing fees should be cheaper."
"Microsoft Azure API Management needs to improve stability."
"They should improve the inbuilt policies that they have and that should properly create a deployment architecture as well."
"When you start with Azure API management, you also need to onboard the Azure console and the Azure cloud environment, which comes with a price."
"Microsoft Azure API Management is lagging behind Apigee and should also have a better CICD process."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
More Microsoft Azure API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 67 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 7.8, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Efficiently manages and monetizes API ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Gateway Enterprise and Axway AMPLIFY API Management, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps and Amazon API Gateway. See our Microsoft Azure API Management vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.