OpenText Functional Testing vs TestProject [EOL] comparison

OpenText and Tricentis are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Additionally, 87% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 71% of Tricentis users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing

Read 98 OpenText Functional Testing reviews

7,852 Views
6,046 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

TestProject [EOL]

Read 6 TestProject [EOL] reviews

71% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing

TestProject [EOL]

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

OpenText Functional Testing and TestProject [EOL] compete in the software testing category, with OpenText having an upper hand due to its comprehensive functionality and support across multiple platforms.

Features: OpenText Functional Testing offers GUI, database, and API testing capabilities, robust automation frameworks, and extensive product compatibility. TestProject [EOL] provides simple record-and-play functionality, ease of use for web and mobile testing, and a scriptless approach appealing to users with limited coding knowledge.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Functional Testing users highlight its high memory consumption, slow execution speed, and the complex price model. TestProject [EOL] needs better integration support, clearer reporting, and faced challenges with the transition from free to commercial offerings.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing offers on-premises and private cloud deployment with varying customer service experiences, while TestProject [EOL] is appreciated for its quick deployment and helpful customer service, often not requiring assistance.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Functional Testing requires significant investment with expensive licenses but offers justified ROI through enhanced productivity. TestProject [EOL] initially offered free usage, which later included licensing costs, providing ROI through its ease of use and open-source framework.

To learn more, read our detailed Test Automation Tools Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,259 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (2nd), Regression Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (4th)

TestProject [EOL]

Average Rating

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Automation becomes feasible with diverse application support and faster development

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Ashu Singh

Senior quality analyst at Lalli

An easy-to-use tool that saves time and functions within a limited budget

The solution's reporting system should be clearer and easier to understand for a layperson. I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it. For a layperson, the solution should be easy to use. Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product. The product's current price should be lowered to attract potential customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Hidden among the kitchen sink of features is a new Data Generation tool called the Test Combinations Generator."

"The best feature of UFT by far is its compatibility with a large variety of products, tools and technologies. It is currently a challenge to find a single tool on the market besides UFT that will successfully automate tests for so many projects and environments."

"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."

"Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge."

"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."

"It's easy to use for beginners and non-technical people."

"Record and Replay to ease onboarding of new users."

"I like the fact that you can record and play the record of your step scripts, and UFT One creates the steps for you in the code base. After that, you can alter the code, and it's more of a natural language code."

More OpenText Functional Testing pros

"Since implementing this solution, our code management has been reduced by 40% to 60%."

"The script-less part of it was good for novice users."

"The ease of web and mobile functional testing is pretty easy on TestProject."

"The automation and AI are very good."

"Ability to carry out automatic testing without having coding knowledge."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

Cons

"There is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to friction-free continuous testing across the software life cycle, as a local installation is required to run UFT."

"Sometimes UFT can take a while to open and sometimes will run slower than expected."

"Scripting has become more complex from a maintenance standpoint to support additional browsers."

"There could be improvements in report export features similar to SmartBear."

"We have had some issues with stability, where it crashes sometimes."

"Previously, the product was a script-based solution. Presently, the tool offers non-script, no-code, or low-code functionalities, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Technical support could be improved."

"The artificial intelligence functionality is applicable only on the web, and it should be expanded to cover non-web applications as well."

More OpenText Functional Testing cons

"I and some other experts may be able to understand the solution's reporting system, but a layperson won't understand it."

"Difficult trying to configure on more than one browser."

"In an upcoming release, there should be a SaaS offering available."

"We'd like to see a direct cloud from TestProject instead of some other third party."

"The support is a weak point since they discontinued the tool."

"TestProject needs better support for integration with other products to provide a better overall solution for test planning and test data management."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It took about five years to break even. UFT is costly."

"It's an expensive solution."

"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

"The price is reasonable."

"HPE recently extended the demo license period from 30 days to 60 days which was a very wise and popular decision to give potential customers more time to install it and try it for free. Even if your company has a salesperson come in and demo UFT, I would highly encourage at least one of your developers or automation engineers to download and install it to explore for themselves the functionality and features included during the demo trial period."

"The solution is priced reasonably for what features it is providing. However, it might be expensive for some."

"The licensing and pricing model is confusing."

"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."

More OpenText Functional Testing pricing and cost advice

"Price-wise, TestProject is an expensive product...With TestProject, there is a need to pay a certain amount towards its licensing costs."

"The solution is free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	71

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?

We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT One?

My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT One?

Reducing the levels of support is something they could continue to improve. They tend to have an entry-level person that may not be as familiar with the product that fields the calls, which creates...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Test Cloud vs OpenText Functional Testing

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

December 2025

Download OpenText Functional Testing product report

Buyer's Guide

TestProject [EOL]

December 2025

Download TestProject [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText

TestProject is a free end-to-end test automation platform for web, mobile, and API testing that’s supported by the #1 test automation community.

Tricentis

Sample Customers

Sage, JetBlue, Haufe.Group, Independent Health, Molina Healthcare, Cox Automotive, andTMNA Services

IBM, Wix, Flir, Payoneer

Buyer's Guide

Test Automation Tools

December 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,259 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.