OpenText Software Delivery Management vs PTC Integrity comparison

OpenText and PTC are both solutions in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category. OpenText is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while PTC is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.5. OpenText holds a 6.0% mindshare in ALM, compared to PTC’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 68% of PTC users who would recommend it.

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Read 41 OpenText Software Delivery Management reviews

3,879 Views
3,685 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

PTC Integrity

Read 13 PTC Integrity reviews

1,882 Views
1,863 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

OpenText Software Delivery ...

PTC Integrity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 19, 2025

PTC Integrity and OpenText Software Delivery Management are competing products in the software development space, with OpenText seemingly having the upper hand due to its advanced features despite higher costs.

Features: PTC Integrity provides strong version control, change management, and requirements traceability. OpenText Software Delivery Management offers a comprehensive suite for end-to-end lifecycle management, tool integration, and platform compatibility, catering to diverse development needs.

Room for Improvement: PTC Integrity could enhance its traceability functions and simplify its user interface. It also lacks some advanced lifecycle management features. OpenText, being more costly, would benefit from offering more competitive pricing, improving its learning curve for new users, and streamlining its setup process.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PTC Integrity provides an on-premise model with solid support, suitable for those preferring infrastructure control. OpenText offers flexible cloud options with a focus on comprehensive customer service, making it ideal for dynamic environments, although it may require more complex initial deployment.

Pricing and ROI: PTC Integrity presents a cost-effective solution with a quicker ROI through efficient integration. Despite OpenText's higher initial cost, its extensive features and adaptability provide a significant long-term ROI for companies seeking comprehensive solutions aligned with evolving business needs.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,170 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Software Delivery ...

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

7th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Agile Planning Tools (7th)

PTC Integrity

Ranking in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites category, the mindshare of OpenText Software Delivery Management is 6.0%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PTC Integrity is 4.4%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites

Featured Reviews

GeorgNauerz

Managing Partner at Georg Nauerz Consulting

A stable tool for sprint planning, test management, quality management, and automated testing

I think the area of release management in the tool is an area of concern where improvements are required. In general, the connection between releases and scrum teams needs improvement, as it could be optimized owing to its linkages, making it very uncomfortable as soon as you have strong teams or scrum teams that work with different items over several releases. In future product releases, the solution needs to focus a bit more on the metric part. The product's dashboard is a metric for productivity and process control.

Read full review

Neha Wanjari

Technical Lead at KPIT Technologies

Helps to create tasks, change requests and documentation

I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn. The tool has a dashboard that details our projects and products, including the number of tasks, change requests, and their statuses (incomplete or complete). Having all this data within the solution makes collaborating easy for our project team. Unlike using multiple tools, having everything we need in one software platform is convenient. I rate the tool's user experience and interface a nine point five out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services."

"The way testing is closely tied into the product Backlog has made it more intuitive, or easier to manage the relationship between building out an application and testing it. In other tools, that is more segregated. The way it's designed in Octane, people have said it makes more sense to them, and that it's easier for them to understand their data and to maintain and test their solutions."

"Current version of the solution is fairly stable."

"We are seeing some real improvements in the way we do things. We are becoming more agile in the way we do it because of that and in a way that stories are managed. Stories are given lifecycles as opposed to just being entities within a tool."

"The dashboards and metric reporting are valuable features."

"The user experience is a lot better than any tool that I have used before. Overall, it is great. It has a smooth interface, which is very user-friendly. It makes it easier to work together and have more transparency and customization, which is very good."

"The integration points are very good. Octane gives us a window not only into our manual testing, but also our automation testing and our performance testing. We can see all results from all three streams of testing in one place."

"The most valuable feature of Micro Focus ALM Octane is the reports. We are able to do customization."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pros

"The most valuable feature is traceability starting from the requirements until the end of a project."

"I personally like PTC Integrity because it provides everything within the software. You can store and access your data and perform various tasks. Compared to other products, I find it user-friendly, which can sometimes feel complex. I think PTC Integrity is user-friendly, making it nice to use. The tool is easier to learn."

"The solution is flexible in terms of customization. You can bend and reformat it in many ways. You can also customize the APIs and public functions."

"The most valuable feature of PTC Integrity is its integration with our existing PTC tools, especially for drawing release activities."

"It's a good tool to manage software versions, update the status, and manage tasks."

"We have been using it because it gives certain abilities in the automotive industry, such as auditing or keeping track of information."

"The tool is quite structured and has a good command set."

"PTC Integrity has good stability."

More PTC Integrity pros

Cons

"There's a trend in our requests to have the ability to export data, en masse, out of Octane. There are capabilities within Octane to export data, but there are specifics around test suites and requirements and relations, as well as certain attributes, that we would like to be able to export easily out of Octane and into a database or Excel."

"Updating items, sorting, bulk updates—these things could have a bit more flexibility, but it's still possible to do them."

"The elements in filtering need to be improved, meaning the number of filters I can use in widgets or in the grid views in parallel. There's a limitation which bothers a lot of our users. Filtering in text, or having a complex filter is limited. In a given field, for example, I can use a filter only once. I cannot say, 'Include the values 1, 2, and 3, and exclude value 17.' This is not possible but we have requested it often."

"The biggest problem with ALM Octane is that it's very complex, so it's difficult to use and scale."

"There is an opportunity for them to do a little more with the dashboarding. We still feel that HPE Quality Center/HPE ALM reporting is very powerful. We talked with R&D, and there are some things on their roadmap, but at the same time, their strategy is to connect Octane with visualization tools such as Power BI."

"Promoting it more could help a lot of projects."

"There is room for improvement in OpenText ALM Octane's flexibility. While it aims to be as flexible as possible for a large enterprise application, sometimes there are limitations that may not meet specific organizational needs."

"The Requirements Module could be better, to build up a better requirements process. There's a huge improvement from ALM.NET to Octane, but it's still not really facilitating all the needs of the product owners, to set up their requirements in Octane."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management cons

"It's not easy to plan on this solution and it's not user-friendly. The interface should be more like a web interface. It's not easy to use."

"The web version does not have all the functionalities of the non-web version. Administration and adding/removing fields, etc. cannot be done on the web version. People want solutions that are compatible with Android. I also want to have a version by which I can bulk edit all the fields."

"The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to."

"To be honest, the third controller system is kind of old. There are lots of transactional changes that have not been implemented in PTC. If you have a larger project, for example, whenever you give bits and need to change 10,000 files you can just commit them. But here the work style is a little more file based, so you'll have to take care of almost all the files individually. It's not a single commit like you do here, but rather you have to allocate time for each component or file that you want to check in or commit. That's a very big issue."

"We are unhappy because everything that we needed required customization and this is not a plug-and-play type of solution at all."

"It's not so customizable. Compared to other tools, defining user stories is a slightly more cumbersome process as an ALM engineer."

"I would like to see better integration from the architectural side."

"For complex businesses, the internal templates could have more flexibility and compatibility."

More PTC Integrity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"For what it does, it's very reasonably priced. I like the licensing model as well, because it's very flexible. You can scale licenses up and down for short periods of time."

"The cost of this product is very high."

"If you compare the price with the functionality, it is pretty much the same as other solutions. If you compare it to Jira, for instance, it has a lot more functionality. You don't need any plug-ins, but it's also more expensive. Once you start adding your different plug-ins to Jira, you'll probably end up with the same amount or more. There is also a yearly support cost, which is usually 25% of the initial cost of the license."

"Pricing is the weakest point. It is expensive, but the tool has plenty of features. The main problem we have is that the pricing is very high compared to some other solutions."

"In my opinion, it's good value for the price that you pay."

"The tool's price is extremely high."

"Microsoft is a big challenge for Micro Focus when it comes to pricing because they are much cheaper. But it definitely depends on the complexity of the environment. If it has multiple technologies, at that point, looking at other options and Microsoft would be a feasible approach."

"The senior management of my company handles the purchases of the solution. However, the price per developer was a major reason we switched from Jira. Apart from the complexity and the support, the price was a major reason that a team of 20 people unanimously decided that we would prefer to go with Micro Focus ALM Octane rather than Jira. The senior management had seen some benefit in it and they preferred it over Jira because the per developer cost was less and the support was superior."

More OpenText Software Delivery Management pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

Manufacturing Company

26%

Computer Software Company

17%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Is Jira better or would you go with Micro Focus ALM Octane?

Hi Netanya, Basically , it all depends on the use cases for your environment and the business needs. Hope the below data may be relevant to you for identifying your needs and deciding on the approp...

See all answers

What do you like most about Micro Focus ALM Octane?

The platform's most valuable feature is pipeline integration or continuous integration services.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus ALM Octane?

OpenText ALM Octane is an expensive product. However, it offsets costs by saving time and money, thus creating a balance between expenses and benefits. Our organization with over 1500 users sees sa...

See all answers

What do you like most about PTC Integrity?

I have found that previously, the OEM sector was managing everything, possibly manually. However, with the introduction of the product, it has become much easier for customers to handle their produ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PTC Integrity?

PTC Integrity is expensive, but it is cheaper compared to IBM Rational. The comparative affordability in pricing is an advantage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PTC Integrity?

The user-friendliness of PTC Integrity can be improved. The interface is not intuitive for first-time users and takes time to get accustomed to. A more straightforward and intuitive interface would...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jira vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Application Quality Management vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 8% of the time

Rally Software vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 4% of the time

TFS vs OpenText Software Delivery Management

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Software Delivery Management Competitors

Codebeamer vs PTC Integrity

Compared 59% of the time

Polarion ALM vs PTC Integrity

Compared 13% of the time

Jira vs PTC Integrity

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) vs PTC Integrity

Compared 7% of the time

Rally Software vs PTC Integrity

Compared 4% of the time

More PTC Integrity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management

June 2025

OpenText Software Delivery Management report

Download OpenText Software Delivery Management product report

Buyer's Guide

PTC Integrity

June 2025

Download PTC Integrity product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus ALM Octane, Micro Focus Octane

MKS

Overview

OpenText Software Delivery Management provides application lifecycle management with Agile and Waterfall support. It features intuitive interfaces, CI/CD integration, automated testing, and robust reporting, improving project management efficiency and usability.

Designed to enhance teams' productivity and streamline processes, OpenText Software Delivery Management integrates seamlessly with Agile methodologies. Its comprehensive backlog and requirements management, user stories, and test management make it a complete tool for managing the development lifecycle. The platform aligns with DevOps, providing traceability and extensive customization options. Traceability from requirements to deployments is enhanced, making it easier for teams to track progress. It offers integration with popular tools like Jenkins and JIRA, ensuring a unified approach to continuous delivery and testing management.

What key features does OpenText Software Delivery Management include?

Versatile across browsers with consistent performance.
Seamless CI/CD integration for smooth development processes.
Intuitive interface aiding in efficiency and ease of use.
Comprehensive backlog management ensures organized prioritization.
Automated testing aligns with Agile and DevOps principles.

What benefits can users expect when evaluating OpenText Software Delivery Management?

Enhanced traceability from inception to delivery.
Improved project management efficiency through streamlined processes.
Robust reporting capabilities offering detailed insights.
Increased flexibility in customization enabling tailored experiences.
Predictive analytics for better decision-making.

OpenText Software Delivery Management is implemented across technology-focused industries, supporting Agile processes like requirements management and defect tracking. Organizations use it to standardize development workflows and optimize continuous delivery integration, choosing it for its ability to support both Agile and Waterfall methodologies within application lifecycle management.

OpenText

The PTC Integrity Software Suite provides a comprehensive set of Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) and Systems Engineering capabilities that enable cross-discipline collaboration, improve time-to-market, streamline compliance, and reduce product risk. Simplify the complexity involved in developing today's complex engineered and smart, connected products.

PTC

Sample Customers

Orange, Airbus, Haufe Group, Kellogg's, Claro, Bon Secours, World Wide Technology

TRW Automotive

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Software Delivery Management vs. PTC Integrity report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.