Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) vs Mend.io comparison

Continuous Dynamic (formerl...

Read 34 Mend.io reviews

9,027 Views
3,972 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) and Mend.io based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Veracode, Checkmarx, OpenText and others in Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).

To learn more, read our detailed Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Continuous Dynamic (formerl...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) (12th)

Mend.io

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (7th), Static Code Analysis (6th), Software Supply Chain Security (4th)

Mindshare comparison

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) and Mend.io aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) is designed for Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) and holds a mindshare of 4.3%, up 2.6% compared to last year.
Mend.io, on the other hand, focuses on Software Composition Analysis (SCA), holds 4.7% mindshare, down 7.6% since last year.

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)	4.3%
Veracode	14.8%
Checkmarx One	14.4%
Other	66.5%

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Mend.io	4.7%
Snyk	11.1%
Black Duck SCA	9.2%
Other	75.0%

Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

Featured Reviews

it_user245412

Executive Vice President, Operations at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

The product and customer service is extremely efficient but I would like to see more research and code examples.

* The continuous online scanning capabilities and reporting features. * The SaaS product features accessible from a browser make managing our online systems easy. * The ability to review security items quickly along with being able to retest vulnerabilities on our schedule make the Sentinel product an invaluable tool for our company’s product security requirements.

Read full review

meetharoon

CEO at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

Centralized security monitoring has reduced false positives and improves dependency governance

The only area for improvement I would say is that the false positives are nearly zero; everything is mostly like 99 to 99.99% or we can say 100% accurate. There were a few areas for improvement just from the last time I saw; I think the user experience had a little problem. We wanted to have certain reports based on our kind of scenario, but the tool did not allow us to create custom reports. We had asked for some facility and some ability for us to create some custom reports. That would be awesome if they allow us to create custom reports the way we wanted. There is one small area which I don't know whether we should call a tool limitation or a wish list; if I use a library and I don't use all the capabilities of the library but only a portion of it and that portion is not vulnerable, but there is a component which is outdated, that is a problem, even though I don't use that component. Mend.io will discover there is a problem in the whole library; that is correct. That's a valid discovery, but in my case, for example, if I don't use that particular portion, then it actually is not making sense for me, but that's not a limitation of Mend.io; I think that's a general problem with any tool in the market because no tool in the market will actually know what portion of the code I'm actually using from that particular library if it is vulnerable or not.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The SaaS product features accessible from a browser make managing our online systems easy."

"Its ease of use and good results are the most valuable."

"What is very nice is that the product is very easy to set up. When you want to implement Mend.io, it just takes a few minutes to create your organization, create your products, and scan them. It's really convenient to have Mend scanning your products in less than one hour."

"The features I find most valuable in Mend.io are the ease of use; it is very easy to access and integrate."

"I am quite happy with WhiteSource; it is very good and provides many things, including extensive reports involving vulnerabilities."

"The solution boasts a broad range of features and covers much of what an ideal SCA tool should."

"The home dashboard itself gives a very good analysis for Mend.io; this is not just for SCA, it is for SAST and container as well, and it gives entire analytics of how many vulnerabilities were found, how much was updated, and how much was fixed over the last three, six, and nine months."

"The dashboard view and the management view are most valuable."

"WhiteSource helped reduce our mean time to resolution since the adoption of the product."

More Mend.io pros

Cons

"I would like to see more research and code examples for the vulnerabilities identified to better assist us with our remediation process."

"WhiteSource needs improvement in the scanning of the containers and images with distinguishing the layers."

"The pricing model needs some changes."

"The UI can be slow once in a while, and we're not sure if it's because of the amount of data we have, or it is just a slow product, but it would be nice if it could be improved."

"WhiteSource is working on a UI refresh. That's probably been one of the pain points for us as it feels like a really old application."

"On the reporting side, they could make some improvements. They are making the reports better and better, but sometimes it takes a lot of time to generate a report for our entire organization."

"We have been looking at how we could improve the automation to human involvement ratio from 60:40 to 70:30, or even potentially 80:20, as there is room for improvement here. We are discussing this internally and with Mend; they are very accommodating to us. We think they openly receive our feedback and do their best to implement our thoughts into the roadmap."

"Up until now, we were convinced that the return of investment was not really the case."

"The only thing that I don't find support for on Mend Prioritize is C++, which they'll be working on since the product is under development."

More Mend.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The version that we are using, WhiteSource Bolt, is a free integration with Azure DevOps."

"It is fairly priced."

"We always negotiate for the best price possible, and as far as I know, Mend has done an excellent job with their pricing. Our management is happy with the pricing, which has led to renewals."

"As we were using an SaaS-based service, the solution must be scalable, although my understanding is that this is based on the licensing model one is using."

"Pricing and licensing are comparable to other tools. When we started, it was less than our existing solution. I can't go into specifics, but it isn't cheap."

"Mend is costly but not overly expensive. The license was quite expensive this year, but we managed to negotiate the price down to the same as last year. At the same time, it's a good value. We're getting what we're paying for and still not using all the features. We could probably get more out of the tool and make it more valuable. At the moment, we don't have the capacity to do that."

"WhiteSource is much more affordable than Veracode."

"Over the last two years, they have tried to add more and more features to their license packages, but the price is a little bit high, comparatively."

More Mend.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Healthcare Company

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	21

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How does WhiteSource compare with SonarQube?

Red Hat Ceph does well in simplifying storage integration by replacing the need for numerous storage solutions. This solution allows for multiple copies of replicated and coded pools to be kept, ea...

See all answers

How does WhiteSource compare with Black Duck?

We researched Black Duck but ultimately chose WhiteSource when looking for an application security tool. WhiteSource is a software solution that enables agile open source security and license compl...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mend.io?

Mend.io SCA offers a competitive pricing structure that is relatively affordable compared to similar solutions in the market. This makes it an attractive option for organizations looking to enhance...

See all answers

Comparisons

Checkmarx One vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 11% of the time

Veracode vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 10% of the time

Fortinet FortiAppSec Cloud vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security vs Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic)

Compared 4% of the time

More Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) Competitors

SonarQube vs Mend.io

Compared 7% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs Mend.io

Compared 6% of the time

Sonatype Lifecycle vs Mend.io

Compared 5% of the time

Veracode vs Mend.io

Compared 5% of the time

Snyk vs Mend.io

Compared 5% of the time

More Mend.io Competitors

Product Reports

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

Download Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) product report

Continuous Dynamic (formerly WhiteHat Dynamic) report

Download Mend.io product report

Also Known As

Sentinel Dynamic, WhiteHat Security Application Security Testing, Synopsys WhiteHat Dynamic

WhiteSource, Mend SCA, Mend.io Supply Chain Defender, Mend SAST

Overview

Continuous Dynamic^™ is a powerful dynamic application security testing (DAST) solution that rapidly and accurately finds vulnerabilities in websites and applications. With this DAST solution, you can perform scans and testing at the scale and speed modern enterprises need to identify security risks across your entire application portfolio.

Black Duck

Mend.io integrates seamlessly into development environments, providing open-source dependency scanning, CVE detection, and license management to enhance security and efficiency during code development.

Mend.io delivers comprehensive open-source vulnerability detection and remediation, seamlessly integrating with CI/CD workflows. It equips organizations with tools for software composition analysis and license risk detection, efficiently identifying vulnerabilities and managing policies. Mend.io supports a wide array of programming languages and deployment environments while integrating with developer tools like GitHub, Jenkins, and Azure DevOps to enhance security feedback and decision-making. Its ease of use and rapid setup boost efficiency in managing open-source dependencies and reducing vulnerabilities.

What are Mend.io's Key Features?

Open-source dependency scanning: Efficiently scans and identifies vulnerabilities in third-party libraries.
CVE detection: Detects and alerts on potential security risks with granularity.
License management: Manages open-source licenses to ensure compliance and reduce legal risks.
Integration: Works seamlessly with Visual Studio, Azure DevOps, and more.
Fix suggestions: Provides actionable solutions to identified vulnerabilities.
Automated policy management: Enhances security by automating policy adherence.

What Advantages Should be Considered in User Feedback?

Development efficiency: Streamlines workflows to improve code security and quality.
Rapid setup: Minimal time investment required, allowing immediate integration into existing processes.
Extensive language support: Accommodates multiple programming environments, enhancing flexibility.
Robust integration options: Compatible with top development tools, bolstering productivity.

Mend.io empowers industries such as finance, healthcare, and e-commerce by integrating robust open-source security measures within their development cycles, enhancing their ability to address vulnerabilities swiftly and maintain compliance amidst rigorous regulatory standards.

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Microsoft, Autodesk, NCR, Target, IBM, vodafone, Siemens, GE digital, KPMG, LivePerson, Jack Henry and Associates

Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)