McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention vs Symantec Endpoint Security comparison

"The administrative capabilities and the interface make this product accessible and easy to use."

"The interface showcases threat incidents very well."

"The solution has good stability and endpoint."

"It can scale."

"The product provides us with an excellent, dependable solution to recommend to clients for their security needs."

"Everything in this DLP is great. It"

"The solution is stable."

"The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly."

"Customer service and support are very good, rating ten out of ten."

"The scheduled scans and the active protection were the most valuable because it allowed me to have the systems protected in real-time and also be able to schedule scans so that as new definitions would update, machines could be scanned to make sure that everything was in tip-top shape and there was nothing lurking in the background."

"The pricing is pretty good."

"One of the features is the ability to frequently get virus signature updates."

"Symantec is very user-friendly, the interface and functions are very simple for everyone to understand. Additionally, it's a very robust system."

"One of the most valuable features is its antivirus database, which is current and updated daily. Another valuable feature is its capacity to be managed by a single server. The solution is managed by a secure server, so all the endpoints are managed from a central point."

"The administrator's console is very good and easy to manage with it. Deploying patches, definition updates and report is simple."

"The features I find the most valuable are the protection, the encryption, and the DLP."

"The solution needs an easier integration in heterogeneous and dynamic environments."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention needs to improve the resources it uses for CPU and RAM."

"The interface can be improved, it's too cluttered."

"I would like the solution to improve the AI features for anti-virus detection. I also want the software to include a tool for malware detection."

"The solution needs to be a one-stop protection shop. And yet, the DLP isn't strong. Anyone can break it quite easily."

"The UI needs to be simplified."

"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."

"If the agent can be minimized so that it can work with in-memory concepts, that would be ideal. As of now, it is file-based, signature-based."

"Technical support could be more responsive."

"The whitelisting feature does not work as expected."

"We are not satisfied with the technical support."

"Nowadays, threats are changing, and they are moving more towards script control and zero-day attacks. So, we would like to have more control similar to an EDR solution. Symantec Endpoint Protection has certainly come a long way as a traditional antivirus, but because the threats are changing, we would like to have more EDR features so that we have a detailed view of the source from where the infection entered the environment and whether it has tried to connect any other endpoint. It should provide such a detailed view for investigation. It should protect against zero-day threats, etc. These are the key enhancements that can make it a complete solution for any enterprise. Currently, we have seen organizations going for two solutions: antivirus and EDR. With both these capabilities, it would be a complete package."

"This solution needs better compatibility with services and applications."

"They need to develop a multi-language interface."

"Maybe Symantec Endpoint Security could amend their pricing structure, but they always offer a good product."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is expensive."

"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is an expensive solution."

"I'm paying the license for McAfee Total Protection yearly. It could be cheaper, but it's fine."

"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."

"There is an annual license to use this solution."

"If the client purchases the entire suite of McAfee Endpoint, the license is included."

"It's not a cheap option."

"The price is high for this type of product."

"It is normal. If you are an educational institute, they give you a very good discount. If you are coming from the banking side, they may or may not give you a discount. I'm working with seven companies, and normally, they get a 65% to 70% discount on everything."

"Its price is fair."

"It provides a good solution at a good price."

"The pricing is good, very moderate, and the licensing is also good. It gives you more room to install a lot of endpoints and it even gives you the opportunity to install it on your mobile phone without any extra cost."

"Its price should be reasonable."

"Pricing and licensing for our country is very good. It's not that expensive and the endpoint security is very good. It's not as cheap as some others, but they are not as good."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"The pricing is pretty much at the market standard... Symantec is not that cheap and it's not that expensive compared to CrowdStrike. I would put them in the 'middle block.'"