"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator has a built-in advanced pattern, which is very useful because it can detect any pattern."
"The general endpoint protection is valuable, and it is easy to manage."
"The security is a key feature and the console is very user friendly."
"Technical support is very helpful."
"The valuable feature of the McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is the management of the policies."
"The most valuable features of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator are the easy-to-use console, and lots of reports, such as customized reports and inventory reports. Additionally, overall the centralized management is very good where you can see the compliance levels and inventory."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is its general purpose of protecting our endpoints from infections, malicious files, and all those kinds of things. The fact that there are organized policies and policy inheritance. The general management."
"You can close your data protection gaps with Zscaler. You can quickly find all the classified, sensitive data across the cloud."
"It's one of the easier products on the market as far as set-ups and deployments. Even across their whole product suite, they've made it pretty simple."
"As a cloud-based service, it is very easily implemented."
"I would like to see McAfee reduce the amount of manual work required."
"The impact of the agent on the endpoint's performance - the resources it takes. Additionally, the difficulties we experience with inheriting and breaking inheritance on the organization's structure breakdown for policy inheritance and then for rules inheritance. We are actually struggling with this."
"Sometimes agents hang. We have to reinstall the agents."
"The solution could improve the EDR component in many areas, such as the zero-day and persistent threats. The implementation is also complex for this feature."
"There should be more insights and completeness into the cyber kill chain, similar to CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. It just seems a little outdated in being 100% signature-based without all of the insights and protections that come with CrowdStrike and SentinelOne. Overall, they've got some catching up to do if they plan to compete in the comprehensive EDR space."
"As for improvements, I think that putting everything on a cloud and one console would be a great idea and would be useful for customers."
"McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator support has been helpful. However, sometimes when I raise the case they take a while to answer. For example, the last time I used them it took them two weeks to reply back by email. No one has contacted me back since. They should improve their service."
"Lacks a single plug-in for multiple uses."
"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."
"In the next release, I would like to see RE2 Regex supported."
"There aren't really any missing features that I have witnessed."
McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is ranked 5th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 8 reviews while Zscaler Cloud DLP is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 3 reviews. McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is rated 7.6, while Zscaler Cloud DLP is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator writes "Improves endpoint security well but takes a lot of resources to do so". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler Cloud DLP writes "Stable with good pricing and very good for monitoring sensitive data". McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator is most compared with McAfee MVISION ePO, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Exabeam Fusion SIEM, whereas Zscaler Cloud DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Endpoint Protector and Code42 Next-Gen DLP.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
