We performed a comparison between ManageEngine IT Asset Management and Qualys VMDR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Asset Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The technical support is great."
"In my opinion, it is the MDM; patch management and deployment are the valuable features."
"The auto-discovery feature has helped us a lot."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"Vulnerability management is the most valuable one and it’s a must in every organization."
"The integrations for this solution are very good. I use a different product for virtual patching of vulnerabilities and Qualys integrates well with that product."
"I like Qualys because it is a very complete product, more so than Tenable."
"Technical support is fantastic."
"The most valuable feature is the certificate management."
"The most valuable features are vulnerability detection and the scanning capability to enable identification of vulnerabilities across our network."
"It is a stable solution."
"The engineering area needs improvement."
"The asset management tool is costly."
"The assets that can be discovered are pretty easy to manage, but there should be a better way to manage non-discoverable assets. Our development team works on bots and tests particular hardware. They have got different varieties of hardware. They want a feature for managing these assets within a warehouse kind of environment. For example, our IT has received 100 items, and they have assigned these items as a bulk unit to a project manager. The project manager further wants to distribute these items within his or her team. Instead of maintaining a separate Excel sheet, the project manager should be able to reallocate these items from within the tool so that we have hierarchical entities for the same unit."
"Qualys VMDR is basically susceptible to false positives, and false negatives."
"The solution is a bit expensive if you do not have access to discounts."
"We are moving away from Qualys to Defender ATP because I find that Defender ATP is much better at prioritizing the vulnerabilities that I should be looking at."
"Qualys VM could improve by having more skilled support personnel."
"It's quite complex on the way it is set up, so it takes a fair bit of time in order to get your head around it in order to deploy it. Once you've deployed it, then you're never confident on the versions of the browsers and the SSL certificates, etc. You have to always go back into Qualys and check."
"Improve the API speed."
"When tested on Zero day, there were errors."
"It would be nice to have an all-in-one solution that was automated and could handle the scanning and reports as well as the patching and updating."
More ManageEngine IT Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine IT Asset Management is ranked 11th in IT Asset Management with 3 reviews while Qualys VMDR is ranked 4th in IT Asset Management with 77 reviews. ManageEngine IT Asset Management is rated 9.4, while Qualys VMDR is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine IT Asset Management writes "Stable and scalable solution ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Qualys VMDR writes "Good visibility but expensive and needs better support". ManageEngine IT Asset Management is most compared with Lansweeper, Freshservice, Axonius, ServiceNow and Device42, whereas Qualys VMDR is most compared with Tenable Nessus, Tenable Security Center, Rapid7 InsightVM, Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management and Tenable Vulnerability Management. See our ManageEngine IT Asset Management vs. Qualys VMDR report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
